Machine learning-based short-term solar power forecasting: a comparison between regression and classification approaches using extensive Australian dataset

H. I. Aouidad, A. Bouhelal
{"title":"Machine learning-based short-term solar power forecasting: a comparison between regression and classification approaches using extensive Australian dataset","authors":"H. I. Aouidad, A. Bouhelal","doi":"10.1186/s40807-024-00115-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solar energy production is an intermittent process that is affected by weather and climate conditions. This can lead to unstable and fluctuating electricity generation, which can cause financial losses and damage to the power grid. To better control power production, it is important to predict solar energy production. Big data and machine learning algorithms have yielded excellent results in this regard. This study compares the performance of two different machine learning approaches to solar energy production prediction: regression and classification. The regression approach predicts the actual power output, while the classification approach predicts whether the power output will be above or below a certain threshold. The study found that the random forest regressor algorithm performed the best in terms of accuracy, with mean absolute errors and root mean square errors of 0.046 and 0.11, respectively. However, it did not predict peak power values effectively, which can lead to higher errors. The long short-term memory algorithm performed better in classifying peak power values. The study concluded that classification models may be better at generalizing than regression models. This proposed approach is valuable for interpreting model performance and improving prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":93049,"journal":{"name":"Renewables: wind, water, and solar","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewables: wind, water, and solar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-024-00115-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solar energy production is an intermittent process that is affected by weather and climate conditions. This can lead to unstable and fluctuating electricity generation, which can cause financial losses and damage to the power grid. To better control power production, it is important to predict solar energy production. Big data and machine learning algorithms have yielded excellent results in this regard. This study compares the performance of two different machine learning approaches to solar energy production prediction: regression and classification. The regression approach predicts the actual power output, while the classification approach predicts whether the power output will be above or below a certain threshold. The study found that the random forest regressor algorithm performed the best in terms of accuracy, with mean absolute errors and root mean square errors of 0.046 and 0.11, respectively. However, it did not predict peak power values effectively, which can lead to higher errors. The long short-term memory algorithm performed better in classifying peak power values. The study concluded that classification models may be better at generalizing than regression models. This proposed approach is valuable for interpreting model performance and improving prediction accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的短期太阳能发电预测:利用大量澳大利亚数据集比较回归和分类方法
太阳能生产是一个受天气和气候条件影响的间歇性过程。这会导致发电量的不稳定和波动,从而造成经济损失和电网损坏。为了更好地控制电力生产,预测太阳能生产非常重要。大数据和机器学习算法在这方面取得了卓越的成果。本研究比较了两种不同的机器学习方法在预测太阳能产量方面的性能:回归法和分类法。回归法预测实际输出功率,而分类法预测输出功率是高于还是低于某个阈值。研究发现,随机森林回归算法的准确性最好,平均绝对误差和均方根误差分别为 0.046 和 0.11。不过,它不能有效预测峰值功率值,这可能会导致更高的误差。长短期记忆算法在峰值功率值的分类方面表现更好。研究认为,分类模型的归纳能力可能优于回归模型。这种建议的方法对于解释模型性能和提高预测准确性很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
A model fitting approach for the investigation of thermo-kinetic parameters of rice straw: a viable renewable energy resources in Bangladesh Vehicle-to-Grid: quantification of its contribution to security of supply through the F-Factor methodology Influence of post-thermal treatment on characteristics of polycrystalline hybrid halide perovskite nanoparticles thin film Photogalvanics of the platinum working electrode in the Allura Red d-Galactose-didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride-NaOH electrolyte Heat recovery analysis of a fixed plate energy recovery ventilator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1