Acquisition experience over performance: Directorship prestige following M&As

IF 2.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jcae.2024.100438
Martin Bugeja, Samir Ghannam, Davina Jeganathan, Yaowen Shan
{"title":"Acquisition experience over performance: Directorship prestige following M&As","authors":"Martin Bugeja,&nbsp;Samir Ghannam,&nbsp;Davina Jeganathan,&nbsp;Yaowen Shan","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2024.100438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Corporate governance research documents that outside directors are not penalised in the director labour market for engaging in value-destroying acquisitions (M&amp;A) as they obtain additional directorships regardless of M&amp;A performance. This result is puzzling as it suggests that the director labour market does not provide sufficient ex post settling-up incentives for outside directors to mitigate agency concerns in the M&amp;A context. We further investigate this issue by examining the prestige of directorships received by independent directors after engaging in an M&amp;A. Using US data, we find that acquiring firm directors are awarded more prestigious directorships, regardless of whether the acquisition resulted in value destruction or value creation. Overall, our findings reinforce the notion that, in the director labour market, acquisition experience holds more value than acquisition ability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"20 3","pages":"Article 100438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566924000389/pdfft?md5=f60f1846acea6c276b078f3b9aac3319&pid=1-s2.0-S1815566924000389-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566924000389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corporate governance research documents that outside directors are not penalised in the director labour market for engaging in value-destroying acquisitions (M&A) as they obtain additional directorships regardless of M&A performance. This result is puzzling as it suggests that the director labour market does not provide sufficient ex post settling-up incentives for outside directors to mitigate agency concerns in the M&A context. We further investigate this issue by examining the prestige of directorships received by independent directors after engaging in an M&A. Using US data, we find that acquiring firm directors are awarded more prestigious directorships, regardless of whether the acquisition resulted in value destruction or value creation. Overall, our findings reinforce the notion that, in the director labour market, acquisition experience holds more value than acquisition ability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收购经验重于业绩:并购后的董事声望
公司治理研究表明,在董事劳动力市场上,外部董事不会因参与破坏价值的并购(M&A)而受到惩罚,因为无论并购业绩如何,他们都能获得额外的董事职位。这一结果令人费解,因为它表明董事劳动力市场没有为外部董事提供足够的事后安置激励,以减轻并购背景下的代理担忧。我们通过研究独立董事在参与并购后获得的董事职位的声望来进一步研究这个问题。利用美国的数据,我们发现无论并购导致的是价值破坏还是价值创造,并购公司的董事都会获得更有声望的董事职位。总体而言,我们的研究结果强化了这样一种观点,即在董事劳动力市场上,收购经验比收购能力更有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Expanded auditor’s reports and voluntary disclosure Long-term tax strategy and corporate acquisition payment structure: An analysis based on the book-tax tradeoff theory Dividend signalling and investor protection: An international comparison MD&A tone and stock returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1