Selective pruning and neuronal death generate heavy-tail network connectivity

Rodrigo Siqueira Kazu, Kleber Neves, Bruno Mota
{"title":"Selective pruning and neuronal death generate heavy-tail network connectivity","authors":"Rodrigo Siqueira Kazu, Kleber Neves, Bruno Mota","doi":"arxiv-2408.02625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the proliferative mechanisms generating neurons from progenitor cells to\nneuron migration and synaptic connection formation, several vicissitudes\nculminate in the mature brain. Both component loss and gain remain ubiquitous\nduring brain development. For example, rodent brains lose over half of their\ninitial neurons and synapses during healthy development. The role of\ndeleterious steps in network ontogeny remains unclear, yet it is unlikely these\ncostly processes are random. Like neurogenesis and synaptogenesis, synaptic\npruning and neuron death likely evolved to support complex, efficient\ncomputations. In order to incorporate both component loss and gain in\ndescribing neuronal networks, we propose an algorithm where a directed network\nevolves through the selective deletion of less-connected nodes (neurons) and\nedges (synapses). Resulting in networks that display scale-invariant degree\ndistributions, provided the network is predominantly feed-forward.\nScale-invariance offers several advantages in biological networks: scalability,\nresistance to random deletions, and strong connectivity with parsimonious\nwiring. Whilst our algorithm is not intended to be a realistic model of\nneuronal network formation, our results suggest selective deletion is an\nadaptive mechanism contributing to more stable and efficient networks. This\nprocess aligns with observed decreasing pruning rates in animal studies,\nresulting in higher synapse preservation. Our overall findings have broader\nimplications for network science. Scale-invariance in degree distributions was\ndemonstrated in growing preferential attachment networks and observed\nempirically. Our preferential detachment algorithm offers an alternative\nmechanism for generating such networks, suggesting that both mechanisms may be\npart of a broader class of algorithms resulting in scale-free networks.","PeriodicalId":501044,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.02625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From the proliferative mechanisms generating neurons from progenitor cells to neuron migration and synaptic connection formation, several vicissitudes culminate in the mature brain. Both component loss and gain remain ubiquitous during brain development. For example, rodent brains lose over half of their initial neurons and synapses during healthy development. The role of deleterious steps in network ontogeny remains unclear, yet it is unlikely these costly processes are random. Like neurogenesis and synaptogenesis, synaptic pruning and neuron death likely evolved to support complex, efficient computations. In order to incorporate both component loss and gain in describing neuronal networks, we propose an algorithm where a directed network evolves through the selective deletion of less-connected nodes (neurons) and edges (synapses). Resulting in networks that display scale-invariant degree distributions, provided the network is predominantly feed-forward. Scale-invariance offers several advantages in biological networks: scalability, resistance to random deletions, and strong connectivity with parsimonious wiring. Whilst our algorithm is not intended to be a realistic model of neuronal network formation, our results suggest selective deletion is an adaptive mechanism contributing to more stable and efficient networks. This process aligns with observed decreasing pruning rates in animal studies, resulting in higher synapse preservation. Our overall findings have broader implications for network science. Scale-invariance in degree distributions was demonstrated in growing preferential attachment networks and observed empirically. Our preferential detachment algorithm offers an alternative mechanism for generating such networks, suggesting that both mechanisms may be part of a broader class of algorithms resulting in scale-free networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择性修剪和神经元死亡产生重尾网络连通性
从祖细胞产生神经元的增殖机制到神经元迁移和突触连接的形成,成熟的大脑经历了数次变化。在大脑发育过程中,成分的丢失和增殖无处不在。例如,啮齿类动物大脑在健康发育过程中会失去一半以上的初始神经元和突触。网络本体发育过程中的异常步骤的作用尚不清楚,但这些代价高昂的过程不太可能是随机的。与神经发生和突触发生一样,突触修剪和神经元死亡也可能是为了支持复杂、高效的计算而进化的。为了在描述神经元网络时同时考虑分量损失和增益,我们提出了一种算法,在这种算法中,有向网络通过选择性删除连接较少的节点(神经元)和桥(突触)而演化。在生物网络中,规模不变性具有以下几个优势:可扩展性、抗随机删除性以及简约布线的强连接性。虽然我们的算法无意成为神经元网络形成的现实模型,但我们的结果表明,选择性删除是一种适应机制,有助于形成更稳定、更高效的网络。这一过程与动物实验中观察到的剪枝率下降一致,从而导致突触保存率提高。我们的总体发现对网络科学具有更广泛的影响。在不断增长的优先附着网络中,我们证明了程度分布的规模不变量,并在经验中观察到了这种不变量。我们的优先分离算法为生成此类网络提供了另一种机制,这表明这两种机制都可能是产生无标度网络的更广泛算法类别的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological arrow of time: Emergence of tangled information hierarchies and self-modelling dynamics k-mer-based approaches to bridging pangenomics and population genetics A weather-driven mathematical model of Culex population abundance and the impact of vector control interventions Dynamics of solutions to a multi-patch epidemic model with a saturation incidence mechanism Higher-order interactions in random Lotka-Volterra communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1