Assessment of infection risk of Omicron variant in subways based on smartcard swipe data

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Transport & Health Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jth.2024.101878
{"title":"Assessment of infection risk of Omicron variant in subways based on smartcard swipe data","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jth.2024.101878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Public transportation, particularly subway systems, is an essential component of many individuals' daily routines and may significantly influence the spread of infection.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study evaluated the risk of transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in subway carriages and the effectiveness of different interventions based on real travel behaviors in Beijing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data on nearly 58 million smartcard swipes for subway rides were collected between April 12 and 18, 2017, before the pandemic, and between February 22 and 28, 2022, during the pandemic period. These smartcard-swipe data were used to analyze changes in local travel behavior due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of infection posed by the Omicron variant, and the efficacy of diverse non-pharmaceutical interventions in subway systems.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Due to the pandemic, the number of passengers in close contact (interpersonal contact within 1.5 m) on the same carriage during both rush and non-rush hours decreased by 31.9% and 43.2% respectively, compared to pre-pandemic period. The <em>R</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> value (the expected number of secondary cases infected by an index case) during the weekdays was three times that of the weekend during the pandemic week. On weekdays during the pandemic, passengers faced a markedly elevated relative risk of infection when traveling during rush hours, which constituted 92.2% of the entire day. Peak-shifting travel could reduce 55.0% of infection risk during rush hour. For the Omicron variant characterized by high infectivity, virus transmission remained uncontrollable (<em>R</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> = 1.34), even when all passengers wore surgical masks. Transmission of Omicron variant could be controlled (<em>R</em><sub><em>t</em></sub> &lt; 1) within subway systems if over 67.5% of passengers wore N95 respirators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Transport & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Transport & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214140524001245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Public transportation, particularly subway systems, is an essential component of many individuals' daily routines and may significantly influence the spread of infection.

Objective

This study evaluated the risk of transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in subway carriages and the effectiveness of different interventions based on real travel behaviors in Beijing.

Methods

Data on nearly 58 million smartcard swipes for subway rides were collected between April 12 and 18, 2017, before the pandemic, and between February 22 and 28, 2022, during the pandemic period. These smartcard-swipe data were used to analyze changes in local travel behavior due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of infection posed by the Omicron variant, and the efficacy of diverse non-pharmaceutical interventions in subway systems.

Results

Due to the pandemic, the number of passengers in close contact (interpersonal contact within 1.5 m) on the same carriage during both rush and non-rush hours decreased by 31.9% and 43.2% respectively, compared to pre-pandemic period. The Rt value (the expected number of secondary cases infected by an index case) during the weekdays was three times that of the weekend during the pandemic week. On weekdays during the pandemic, passengers faced a markedly elevated relative risk of infection when traveling during rush hours, which constituted 92.2% of the entire day. Peak-shifting travel could reduce 55.0% of infection risk during rush hour. For the Omicron variant characterized by high infectivity, virus transmission remained uncontrollable (Rt = 1.34), even when all passengers wore surgical masks. Transmission of Omicron variant could be controlled (Rt < 1) within subway systems if over 67.5% of passengers wore N95 respirators.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据智能卡刷卡数据评估地铁中 Omicron 变体的感染风险
公共交通,尤其是地铁系统,是许多人日常生活的重要组成部分,可能会对感染的传播产生重大影响。本研究评估了 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron 变体在地铁车厢内的传播风险,以及基于北京真实出行行为的不同干预措施的效果。研究收集了2017年4月12日至18日(大流行前)和2022年2月22日至28日(大流行期间)期间近5800万次乘坐地铁的智能卡刷卡数据。这些智能卡刷卡数据被用于分析 COVID-19 大流行对当地出行行为造成的影响、Omicron 变种造成的感染风险以及地铁系统中各种非药物干预措施的效果。与疫情发生前相比,疫情发生后,高峰时段和非高峰时段同一节车厢内密切接触(1.5 米以内的人际接触)的乘客人数分别减少了 31.9% 和 43.2%。在大流行周期间,平日的数值(由指数病例感染的继发病例的预期数量)是周末的三倍。在大流行期间的工作日,乘客在高峰时段(占全天时间的 92.2%)出行时面临的感染相对风险明显升高。错峰出行可降低高峰时段 55.0% 的感染风险。对于具有高传染性的 Omicron 变体,即使所有乘客都戴上外科口罩,病毒传播仍无法控制(=1.34)。如果超过 67.5%的乘客佩戴 N95 呼吸器,则奥米克隆变种病毒在地铁系统内的传播可以得到控制(小于 1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Deciphering the character of public transport participation in subjective well-being: Evidence from Hangzhou, China Health in mobility planning: An assessment of how health is considered in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans New challenges arise from consolidation of gender, health and transport research Incident reporting and data monitoring of sexual violence and harassment on public transport Differences between adolescents' and their parents' perceived benefits and barriers to actively commute to school: The PACO y PACA project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1