Online Collaborative Learning in Pediatric Dentistry Using Microsoft Teams: A Pilot Study

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-11 DOI:10.3390/educsci14080874
Antonia M. Caleya, Andrea Martín-Vacas, Gonzalo Feijóo, Maria Rosa Mourelle-Martínez, Manuel Joaquín de Nova-Garcia, Nuria E. Gallardo-López
{"title":"Online Collaborative Learning in Pediatric Dentistry Using Microsoft Teams: A Pilot Study","authors":"Antonia M. Caleya, Andrea Martín-Vacas, Gonzalo Feijóo, Maria Rosa Mourelle-Martínez, Manuel Joaquín de Nova-Garcia, Nuria E. Gallardo-López","doi":"10.3390/educsci14080874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative learning (CL) is the instructional use of small groups in such a way that students work together to maximize their own and others’ learning. In this study, the aim was to implement online collaborative learning (OCL) using the Microsoft Teams (MT) platform and to analyze the students’ preferences regarding presential or online learning. Material and Methods: A descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted with 79 students from the Degree in Dentistry. Four groups were created with MT and clinical cases or problems were uploaded for online discussion with each group. Additionally, as part of the course program, the students were divided into the same groups for to carry out Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in person. Afterwards, students completed a project assessment and satisfaction survey. Results: The survey revealed that the students found participation in this project to be useful or very useful. Their experiences with MT were rated as positive or very positive. However, a significant portion of the students (42.6%) preferred conventional face-to-face (FF) problem-solving, while 27.9% preferred using online tools. Based on the execution of this project and the open feedback on the use of MT, we have outlined a series of recommendations to enhance the use of this platform. Conclusions: MT is a highly useful platform for online teaching, offering multiple tools to promote learning in a virtual and asynchronous manner. However, when comparing CL through PBL conducted FF versus online, students still prefer in-person teaching to virtual methods.","PeriodicalId":11472,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collaborative learning (CL) is the instructional use of small groups in such a way that students work together to maximize their own and others’ learning. In this study, the aim was to implement online collaborative learning (OCL) using the Microsoft Teams (MT) platform and to analyze the students’ preferences regarding presential or online learning. Material and Methods: A descriptive and analytical cross-sectional study was conducted with 79 students from the Degree in Dentistry. Four groups were created with MT and clinical cases or problems were uploaded for online discussion with each group. Additionally, as part of the course program, the students were divided into the same groups for to carry out Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in person. Afterwards, students completed a project assessment and satisfaction survey. Results: The survey revealed that the students found participation in this project to be useful or very useful. Their experiences with MT were rated as positive or very positive. However, a significant portion of the students (42.6%) preferred conventional face-to-face (FF) problem-solving, while 27.9% preferred using online tools. Based on the execution of this project and the open feedback on the use of MT, we have outlined a series of recommendations to enhance the use of this platform. Conclusions: MT is a highly useful platform for online teaching, offering multiple tools to promote learning in a virtual and asynchronous manner. However, when comparing CL through PBL conducted FF versus online, students still prefer in-person teaching to virtual methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用微软团队进行儿童牙科在线协作学习:试点研究
协作学习(Collaborative Learning,CL)是指在教学中使用小组的方式,让学生共同协作,最大限度地提高自己和他人的学习效果。本研究的目的是利用微软团队(MT)平台实施在线协作学习(OCL),并分析学生对现场学习或在线学习的偏好。材料与方法对口腔医学专业的 79 名学生进行了描述性和分析性横断面研究。通过 MT 创建了四个小组,每个小组都上传了临床病例或问题供在线讨论。此外,作为课程计划的一部分,学生们被分成相同的小组,亲自开展基于问题的学习(PBL)。之后,学生们完成了项目评估和满意度调查。结果显示调查显示,学生们认为参与该项目是有用或非常有用的。他们对 MT 的体验评价为积极或非常积极。然而,相当一部分学生(42.6%)更喜欢传统的面对面(FF)解决问题,而 27.9% 的学生更喜欢使用在线工具。根据本项目的实施情况和对使用 MT 的公开反馈,我们概述了一系列建议,以加强对这一平台的使用。结论:MT 是一个非常有用的在线教学平台,可提供多种工具,以虚拟和异步的方式促进学习。然而,当比较通过 FF 和在线进行的 PBL 学习时,学生们仍然更喜欢面对面教学,而不是虚拟教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Education Sciences
Education Sciences Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
770
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Online Pedagogies and the Middle Grades: A Scoping Review of the Literature Self-Regulation Profiles of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers for Primary Education in Mathematical Problem-Solving Contexts Updating Calculus Teaching with AI: A Classroom Experience The Effects of Invented Spelling Instruction on Literacy Achievement and Writing Motivation Effectiveness of the Flipped Project-Based Learning Model Based on Moodle LMS to Improve Student Communication and Problem-Solving Skills in Learning Programming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1