Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Computational Economics Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2
Omer Burak Akgun, Emrah Gulay
{"title":"Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations","authors":"Omer Burak Akgun, Emrah Gulay","doi":"10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The modeling and forecasting of return volatility for the top three cryptocurrencies, which are identified by the highest trading volumes, is the main focus of the study. Eleven different GARCH-type models were analyzed using a comprehensive methodology in six different distributions, and deep learning algorithms were used to rigorously assess each model’s forecasting performance. Additionally, the study investigates the impact of selecting dynamic parameters for the forecasting performance of these models. This study investigates if there are any appreciable differences in forecast outcomes between the two different realized variance calculations and variations in training size. Further investigation focuses on how the use of expanding and rolling windows affects the optimal window type for forecasting. Finally, the importance of choosing different error measurements is emphasized in the framework of comparing forecasting performances. Our results indicate that in GARCH-type models, 5-minute realized variance shows the best forecasting performance, while in deep learning models, median realized variance (MedRV) has the best performance. Moreover, it has been determined that an increase in the training/test ratio and the selection of the rolling window approach both play important roles in achieving better forecast accuracy. Finally, our results show that deep learning models outperform GARCH-type models in volatility forecasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50647,"journal":{"name":"Computational Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modeling and forecasting of return volatility for the top three cryptocurrencies, which are identified by the highest trading volumes, is the main focus of the study. Eleven different GARCH-type models were analyzed using a comprehensive methodology in six different distributions, and deep learning algorithms were used to rigorously assess each model’s forecasting performance. Additionally, the study investigates the impact of selecting dynamic parameters for the forecasting performance of these models. This study investigates if there are any appreciable differences in forecast outcomes between the two different realized variance calculations and variations in training size. Further investigation focuses on how the use of expanding and rolling windows affects the optimal window type for forecasting. Finally, the importance of choosing different error measurements is emphasized in the framework of comparing forecasting performances. Our results indicate that in GARCH-type models, 5-minute realized variance shows the best forecasting performance, while in deep learning models, median realized variance (MedRV) has the best performance. Moreover, it has been determined that an increase in the training/test ratio and the selection of the rolling window approach both play important roles in achieving better forecast accuracy. Finally, our results show that deep learning models outperform GARCH-type models in volatility forecasts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
已实现波动率预测的动态性:跨参数变化评估 GARCH 模型和深度学习算法
本研究的重点是对交易量最高的前三种加密货币的回报波动性进行建模和预测。采用综合方法分析了六种不同分布的 11 种不同 GARCH 类型模型,并使用深度学习算法严格评估了每个模型的预测性能。此外,本研究还调查了选择动态参数对这些模型预测性能的影响。本研究调查了两种不同的已实现方差计算方法和训练规模变化之间的预测结果是否存在明显差异。进一步调查的重点是扩展窗口和滚动窗口的使用如何影响预测的最佳窗口类型。最后,在比较预测性能的框架下,强调了选择不同误差测量的重要性。我们的研究结果表明,在 GARCH 类型模型中,5 分钟已实现方差显示出最佳预测性能,而在深度学习模型中,中位已实现方差(MedRV)具有最佳性能。此外,我们还确定,提高训练/测试比率和选择滚动窗口方法对获得更好的预测准确性都有重要作用。最后,我们的结果表明,深度学习模型在波动率预测方面优于 GARCH 类型模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Economics
Computational Economics MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
119
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Computational Economics, the official journal of the Society for Computational Economics, presents new research in a rapidly growing multidisciplinary field that uses advanced computing capabilities to understand and solve complex problems from all branches in economics. The topics of Computational Economics include computational methods in econometrics like filtering, bayesian and non-parametric approaches, markov processes and monte carlo simulation; agent based methods, machine learning, evolutionary algorithms, (neural) network modeling; computational aspects of dynamic systems, optimization, optimal control, games, equilibrium modeling; hardware and software developments, modeling languages, interfaces, symbolic processing, distributed and parallel processing
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Dual Impact of the Social Media Platforms on Psychological Well-being: A Multiple-Option Descriptive-Predictive Framework Modeling Asset Price Process: An Approach for Imaging Price Chart with Generative Diffusion Models Is the Price of Ether Driven by Demand or Pure Speculation? Iterative Deep Learning Approach to Active Portfolio Management with Sentiment Factors Asset Prices with Investor Protection in the Cross-Sectional Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1