Tina P. Gunaldo , Kelly Lockeman , Abigale T. Matulewicz , Harun Mazumder
{"title":"Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B)","authors":"Tina P. Gunaldo , Kelly Lockeman , Abigale T. Matulewicz , Harun Mazumder","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2024.100722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS) was developed to measure interprofessional socialization as one adopts and integrates learning into practice. While items for the ISVS-9A and 9B were drawn from three subscales of the original 24-item tool, these parallel forms were validated as a unidimensional measure using Canadian health professional and student populations.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim was to investigate if the ISVS-9A and ISVS-9B forms are interchangeable and examine their internal structure.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Students completed an 18-question survey that included the nine items from the ISVS-9A followed by the nine items for ISVS-9B.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Two U.S. academic health science centers provided longitudinal interprofessional education (IPE) in a classroom setting.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>625 students representing 13 programs from one institution and 512 students representing 7 health professions programs from the second institution were included in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants completed the ISVS-9A and 9B as a single form. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals were calculated to measure the absolute agreement between the scores from the ISVS-9A and 9B forms. A factor analysis considering the original tool's three subscales was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>592 responses from one institution and 500 responses from the second institution were analyzed. ICC for the ISVS total scores demonstrated good reliability (0.75–0.90). However, the internal structure of the three factors demonstrated moderate reliability (0.5–0.75) and may need further investigation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study confirms the use of the ISVS-9A and 9B total score to measure interprofessional socialization in health professional students attending U.S. institutions. Additional research is needed to determine potential reasons for mixed outcomes from studies using ISVS-9A and 9B parallel forms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100722"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452624000296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS) was developed to measure interprofessional socialization as one adopts and integrates learning into practice. While items for the ISVS-9A and 9B were drawn from three subscales of the original 24-item tool, these parallel forms were validated as a unidimensional measure using Canadian health professional and student populations.
Objectives
The aim was to investigate if the ISVS-9A and ISVS-9B forms are interchangeable and examine their internal structure.
Design
Students completed an 18-question survey that included the nine items from the ISVS-9A followed by the nine items for ISVS-9B.
Settings
Two U.S. academic health science centers provided longitudinal interprofessional education (IPE) in a classroom setting.
Participants
625 students representing 13 programs from one institution and 512 students representing 7 health professions programs from the second institution were included in the study.
Methods
Participants completed the ISVS-9A and 9B as a single form. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals were calculated to measure the absolute agreement between the scores from the ISVS-9A and 9B forms. A factor analysis considering the original tool's three subscales was conducted.
Results
592 responses from one institution and 500 responses from the second institution were analyzed. ICC for the ISVS total scores demonstrated good reliability (0.75–0.90). However, the internal structure of the three factors demonstrated moderate reliability (0.5–0.75) and may need further investigation.
Conclusions
This study confirms the use of the ISVS-9A and 9B total score to measure interprofessional socialization in health professional students attending U.S. institutions. Additional research is needed to determine potential reasons for mixed outcomes from studies using ISVS-9A and 9B parallel forms.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.