Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B)

{"title":"Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B)","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2024.100722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS) was developed to measure interprofessional socialization as one adopts and integrates learning into practice. While items for the ISVS-9A and 9B were drawn from three subscales of the original 24-item tool, these parallel forms were validated as a unidimensional measure using Canadian health professional and student populations.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The aim was to investigate if the ISVS-9A and ISVS-9B forms are interchangeable and examine their internal structure.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Students completed an 18-question survey that included the nine items from the ISVS-9A followed by the nine items for ISVS-9B.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Two U.S. academic health science centers provided longitudinal interprofessional education (IPE) in a classroom setting.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>625 students representing 13 programs from one institution and 512 students representing 7 health professions programs from the second institution were included in the study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants completed the ISVS-9A and 9B as a single form. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals were calculated to measure the absolute agreement between the scores from the ISVS-9A and 9B forms. A factor analysis considering the original tool's three subscales was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>592 responses from one institution and 500 responses from the second institution were analyzed. ICC for the ISVS total scores demonstrated good reliability (0.75–0.90). However, the internal structure of the three factors demonstrated moderate reliability (0.5–0.75) and may need further investigation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study confirms the use of the ISVS-9A and 9B total score to measure interprofessional socialization in health professional students attending U.S. institutions. Additional research is needed to determine potential reasons for mixed outcomes from studies using ISVS-9A and 9B parallel forms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452624000296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Interprofessional Socialization and Valuing Scale (ISVS) was developed to measure interprofessional socialization as one adopts and integrates learning into practice. While items for the ISVS-9A and 9B were drawn from three subscales of the original 24-item tool, these parallel forms were validated as a unidimensional measure using Canadian health professional and student populations.

Objectives

The aim was to investigate if the ISVS-9A and ISVS-9B forms are interchangeable and examine their internal structure.

Design

Students completed an 18-question survey that included the nine items from the ISVS-9A followed by the nine items for ISVS-9B.

Settings

Two U.S. academic health science centers provided longitudinal interprofessional education (IPE) in a classroom setting.

Participants

625 students representing 13 programs from one institution and 512 students representing 7 health professions programs from the second institution were included in the study.

Methods

Participants completed the ISVS-9A and 9B as a single form. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals were calculated to measure the absolute agreement between the scores from the ISVS-9A and 9B forms. A factor analysis considering the original tool's three subscales was conducted.

Results

592 responses from one institution and 500 responses from the second institution were analyzed. ICC for the ISVS total scores demonstrated good reliability (0.75–0.90). However, the internal structure of the three factors demonstrated moderate reliability (0.5–0.75) and may need further investigation.

Conclusions

This study confirms the use of the ISVS-9A and 9B total score to measure interprofessional socialization in health professional students attending U.S. institutions. Additional research is needed to determine potential reasons for mixed outcomes from studies using ISVS-9A and 9B parallel forms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估 9 个项目的跨专业社会化和重视程度量表(ISVS-9A/9B)交替形式的可靠性
背景开发跨专业社会化与价值量表(ISVS)的目的是为了测量跨专业社会化情况,因为人们会将学习融入实践中。虽然 ISVS-9A 和 9B 的项目取自最初的 24 个项目工具的三个分量表,但这些平行的量表作为单维量表已通过加拿大卫生专业人员和学生群体的验证。设计学生们完成了一份包含 18 个问题的调查问卷,其中包括 ISVS-9A 的 9 个项目和 ISVS-9B 的 9 个项目。设置美国两所学术健康科学中心在课堂教学环境中提供纵向跨专业教育(IPE).参与研究的有来自一所院校 13 个专业的 625 名学生和来自第二所院校 7 个健康专业的 512 名学生.方法参与研究的学生以单一表格的形式填写 ISVS-9A 和 9B。通过计算类内相关系数(ICC)和相应的 95 % 置信区间来衡量 ISVS-9A 和 9B 两种表格得分之间的绝对一致性。对一个机构的 592 份问卷和第二个机构的 500 份问卷进行了分析。ISVS 总分的 ICC 显示出良好的可靠性(0.75-0.90)。结论本研究证实了 ISVS-9A 和 9B 总分可用于测量美国院校卫生专业学生的跨专业社会化程度。对于使用 ISVS-9A 和 9B 平行表格进行的研究结果喜忧参半的潜在原因,还需要进一步的研究来确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
期刊最新文献
Response-shift effect for self-assessment: Magnitude and accuracy within an interprofessional education course Interprofessional heart failure education for self-care knowledge and medication adherence in cardiac rehabiliation patients: A short report How team-based are rural or underserved clinics where AHEC scholars train? Evaluation of alternate form reliability for the 9-item versions of the interprofessional socialization and valuing scale (ISVS-9A/9B) Advancing interprofessional workplace learning: Successful implementation of the ‘WILD Series©’ hybrid professional development model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1