A Comparative Study on System Modeling Notations

Shuichiro Yamamoto
{"title":"A Comparative Study on System Modeling Notations","authors":"Shuichiro Yamamoto","doi":"10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There are several system modeling notations based on system thinking. So far, these notations have not been compared. In this paper, we propose the GPDAC (Goal, Process, Data, Actor, Control) as a framework for creating new systems engineering knowledge by recombining knowledge from different academic fields. Moreover, a comparative study reveals the relationship among system modeling notations such as Systemigram, OPM (Object Process Methodology), and ArchiMate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20465,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Computer Science","volume":"239 ","pages":"Pages 27-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050924013851/pdf?md5=a8f4915f8f53aa98c3c8d8b8cbbb8350&pid=1-s2.0-S1877050924013851-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050924013851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are several system modeling notations based on system thinking. So far, these notations have not been compared. In this paper, we propose the GPDAC (Goal, Process, Data, Actor, Control) as a framework for creating new systems engineering knowledge by recombining knowledge from different academic fields. Moreover, a comparative study reveals the relationship among system modeling notations such as Systemigram, OPM (Object Process Methodology), and ArchiMate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统建模符号比较研究
目前有几种基于系统思维的系统建模符号。迄今为止,还没有对这些符号进行过比较。在本文中,我们提出了 GPDAC(目标、过程、数据、角色、控制)作为一个框架,通过重新组合不同学术领域的知识来创建新的系统工程知识。此外,比较研究揭示了 Systemigram、OPM(对象过程方法论)和 ArchiMate 等系统建模符号之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Circular Supply Chains and Industry 4.0: An Analysis of Interfaces in Brazilian Foodtechs Potentials of the Metaverse for Robotized Applications in Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 Preface Preface Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1