“School near workplace” or “school near home”: Which one is better for the morning commute with both individual and household travelers in Y-shaped networks?

IF 7.6 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2024.104793
Zhao-Rui Li, Xiao Han, Rui Jiang
{"title":"“School near workplace” or “school near home”: Which one is better for the morning commute with both individual and household travelers in Y-shaped networks?","authors":"Zhao-Rui Li,&nbsp;Xiao Han,&nbsp;Rui Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Household travelers typically need to coordinate their travel decisions in various aspects, such as destination and trip-timing, resulting in distinctive travel patterns compared to individual travelers. This paper investigates the morning commute problem in a “Y-shaped” network featuring “school near workplace” in consideration of both individual and household travelers and further understands the impact of school locations on the morning commute by comparing it with the “school near home” network. We analytically derive all equilibrium cases in the “school near workplace” network and classify them into three traffic patterns. We analyze the welfare effects of the staggering policy, finding that implementing the staggering policy in the “school near workplace” network can achieve a “win–win” scenario for individuals and household travelers in some equilibrium cases. Also, when the capacity ratio of school-constrained bottleneck to common-constrained bottleneck is below a threshold, which one is better (i.e., “school near workplace” or “school near home”) depends on the free-flow travel costs of the two networks. Locating the school “near workplace” is better than “near home” when the difference in the free-flow related costs for children between the two networks is not very large. Furthermore, we analyze the welfare effects of bottleneck expansion in the “school near workplace” network, finding that bottleneck expansion paradox may emerge when expanding the school-constrained bottleneck. Although properly designing the schedule gap can eliminate the paradox, a significant increase in the schedule gap may be needed to escape from the paradoxical cases when the common-constrained bottleneck capacity is slightly larger than the school-constrained bottleneck capacity. Our study sheds light on the importance of school locations in determining the performance of traffic management policies in the morning commute with both individual and household travelers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":"166 ","pages":"Article 104793"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24003140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Household travelers typically need to coordinate their travel decisions in various aspects, such as destination and trip-timing, resulting in distinctive travel patterns compared to individual travelers. This paper investigates the morning commute problem in a “Y-shaped” network featuring “school near workplace” in consideration of both individual and household travelers and further understands the impact of school locations on the morning commute by comparing it with the “school near home” network. We analytically derive all equilibrium cases in the “school near workplace” network and classify them into three traffic patterns. We analyze the welfare effects of the staggering policy, finding that implementing the staggering policy in the “school near workplace” network can achieve a “win–win” scenario for individuals and household travelers in some equilibrium cases. Also, when the capacity ratio of school-constrained bottleneck to common-constrained bottleneck is below a threshold, which one is better (i.e., “school near workplace” or “school near home”) depends on the free-flow travel costs of the two networks. Locating the school “near workplace” is better than “near home” when the difference in the free-flow related costs for children between the two networks is not very large. Furthermore, we analyze the welfare effects of bottleneck expansion in the “school near workplace” network, finding that bottleneck expansion paradox may emerge when expanding the school-constrained bottleneck. Although properly designing the schedule gap can eliminate the paradox, a significant increase in the schedule gap may be needed to escape from the paradoxical cases when the common-constrained bottleneck capacity is slightly larger than the school-constrained bottleneck capacity. Our study sheds light on the importance of school locations in determining the performance of traffic management policies in the morning commute with both individual and household travelers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"学校离家近 "还是 "学校离家近"?对于 Y 型网络中的个人和家庭旅行者而言,哪种方式更适合早晨通勤?
与个人旅行者相比,家庭旅行者通常需要协调他们在目的地和旅行时间等各方面的旅行决策,从而形成独特的旅行模式。本文研究了以 "学校靠近工作地点 "为特征的 "Y "型网络中的早间通勤问题,同时考虑了个人和家庭旅行者,并通过与 "学校靠近家庭 "网络的比较,进一步了解了学校位置对早间通勤的影响。我们通过分析推导出 "学校靠近工作地点 "网络中的所有均衡情况,并将其划分为三种交通模式。我们分析了错峰政策的福利效应,发现在 "就近入学 "网络中实施错峰政策可以在某些均衡情况下实现个人和家庭出行者的 "双赢"。此外,当 "学校受限瓶颈 "与 "公共受限瓶颈 "的容量比低于临界值时,"学校靠近工作地点 "与 "学校靠近家庭 "孰优孰劣取决于两个网络的自由流动出行成本。当两个网络中儿童的自由流动相关成本相差不大时,将学校设在 "工作地点附近 "比设在 "家附近 "更好。此外,我们还分析了 "学校靠近工作地点 "网络中瓶颈扩展的福利效应,发现在扩展学校受限的瓶颈时,可能会出现瓶颈扩展悖论。虽然合理设计时间表间隙可以消除悖论,但当公共约束瓶颈容量略大于学校约束瓶颈容量时,可能需要大幅增加时间表间隙才能摆脱悖论。我们的研究揭示了学校位置在决定交通管理政策在个人和家庭出行者早晨通勤中的表现方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
12.00%
发文量
332
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.
期刊最新文献
The dynamic system optimal departure time choice problem for a bottleneck with a stochastic capacity: Model formulation and solution algorithm Dynamic on-demand delivery with spatial divisions of labor Multi-reservoir traffic dynamics: Outflow network MFD and state estimation with sparse traffic data U-Aerodrome: Data-driven and risk-bounded airspace reconfiguration for safe integration of urban air mobility at aerodrome CONTINA: Confidence interval for traffic demand prediction with coverage guarantee
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1