How are Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Used in Digital Behavior Change Interventions? A Scoping Review

Amy Bucher PhD, E. Susanne Blazek PhD, Christopher T. Symons PhD
{"title":"How are Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Used in Digital Behavior Change Interventions? A Scoping Review","authors":"Amy Bucher PhD,&nbsp;E. Susanne Blazek PhD,&nbsp;Christopher T. Symons PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To assess the current real-world applications of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) as functionality of digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) that influence patient or consumer health behaviors. A scoping review was done across the EMBASE, PsycInfo, PsycNet, PubMed, and Web of Science databases using search terms related to ML/AI, behavioral science, and digital health to find live DBCIs using ML or AI to influence real-world health behaviors in patients or consumers. A total of 32 articles met inclusion criteria. Evidence regarding behavioral domains, target real-world behaviors, and type and purpose of ML and AI used were extracted. The types and quality of research evaluations done on the DBCIs and limitations of the research were also reviewed. Research occurred between October 9, 2023, and January 20, 2024. Twenty-three DBCIs used AI to influence real-world health behaviors. Most common domains were cardiometabolic health (n=5, 21.7%) and lifestyle interventions (n=4, 17.4%). The most common types of ML and AI used were classical ML algorithms (n=10, 43.5%), reinforcement learning (n=8, 34.8%), natural language understanding (n=8, 34.8%), and conversational AI (n=5, 21.7%). Evidence was generally positive, but had limitations such as inability to detect causation, low generalizability, or insufficient study duration to understand long-term outcomes. Despite evidence gaps related to the novelty of the technology, research supports the promise of using AI in DBCIs to manage complex input data and offer personalized, contextualized support for people changing real-world behaviors. Key opportunities are standardizing terminology and improving understanding of what ML and AI are.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74127,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 375-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000427/pdfft?md5=6c9780a76948435fb6c91a05b2e3b023&pid=1-s2.0-S2949761224000427-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949761224000427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the current real-world applications of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) as functionality of digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs) that influence patient or consumer health behaviors. A scoping review was done across the EMBASE, PsycInfo, PsycNet, PubMed, and Web of Science databases using search terms related to ML/AI, behavioral science, and digital health to find live DBCIs using ML or AI to influence real-world health behaviors in patients or consumers. A total of 32 articles met inclusion criteria. Evidence regarding behavioral domains, target real-world behaviors, and type and purpose of ML and AI used were extracted. The types and quality of research evaluations done on the DBCIs and limitations of the research were also reviewed. Research occurred between October 9, 2023, and January 20, 2024. Twenty-three DBCIs used AI to influence real-world health behaviors. Most common domains were cardiometabolic health (n=5, 21.7%) and lifestyle interventions (n=4, 17.4%). The most common types of ML and AI used were classical ML algorithms (n=10, 43.5%), reinforcement learning (n=8, 34.8%), natural language understanding (n=8, 34.8%), and conversational AI (n=5, 21.7%). Evidence was generally positive, but had limitations such as inability to detect causation, low generalizability, or insufficient study duration to understand long-term outcomes. Despite evidence gaps related to the novelty of the technology, research supports the promise of using AI in DBCIs to manage complex input data and offer personalized, contextualized support for people changing real-world behaviors. Key opportunities are standardizing terminology and improving understanding of what ML and AI are.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在数字化行为改变干预中使用机器学习和人工智能?范围审查
目的:评估当前机器学习(ML)和人工智能(AI)在现实世界中的应用,作为影响患者或消费者健康行为的数字化行为改变干预措施(DBCIs)的功能。我们在 EMBASE、PsycInfo、PsycNet、PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库中使用与 ML/AI、行为科学和数字健康相关的检索词进行了范围审查,以找到使用 ML 或 AI 影响患者或消费者真实世界健康行为的实时 DBCI。共有 32 篇文章符合纳入标准。我们提取了有关行为领域、目标真实世界行为以及所使用的人工智能类型和目的的证据。此外,还审查了对 DBCIs 所做研究评估的类型和质量以及研究的局限性。研究时间为 2023 年 10 月 9 日至 2024 年 1 月 20 日。23 个 DBCI 使用人工智能来影响现实世界中的健康行为。最常见的领域是心脏代谢健康(5 个,占 21.7%)和生活方式干预(4 个,占 17.4%)。最常用的 ML 和 AI 类型是经典 ML 算法(10 个,占 43.5%)、强化学习(8 个,占 34.8%)、自然语言理解(8 个,占 34.8%)和会话式 AI(5 个,占 21.7%)。证据总体上是积极的,但也有局限性,如无法检测因果关系、普遍性低或研究持续时间不足,无法了解长期结果。尽管存在与技术新颖性相关的证据差距,但研究支持在 DBCI 中使用人工智能管理复杂输入数据并为改变现实世界行为的人们提供个性化、情景化支持的前景。关键的机遇在于术语的标准化和提高对什么是 ML 和 AI 的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health
Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Digital health Medicine and Dentistry (General), Health Informatics, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊最新文献
Developing a Research Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Strategic Considerations for Selecting Artificial Intelligence Solutions for Institutional Integration: A Single-Center Experience Reviewers for Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health (2024) A Blueprint for Clinical-Driven Medical Device Development: The Feverkidstool Application to Identify Children With Serious Bacterial Infection Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiograms for Early Detection of Low Ejection Fraction: A Secondary Analysis of the Electrocardiogram Artificial Intelligence-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1