David Diaz Hurtado , Maria Pilar Etxart Lasa , Oihane Izaga Gonzalez , Leire Lodoso Gibaja , Maria Teresa Ruiz de Larramendi Fernandez , Ioana Riaño Fernandez
{"title":"Efecto de un gel de silicona tópico y un apósito de poliuretano en la evolución de cicatrices","authors":"David Diaz Hurtado , Maria Pilar Etxart Lasa , Oihane Izaga Gonzalez , Leire Lodoso Gibaja , Maria Teresa Ruiz de Larramendi Fernandez , Ioana Riaño Fernandez","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcli.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effectiveness and safety of a topical silicone gel (BE<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices) and a polyurethane dressing (BE<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices) on the evolution of scars of patients who were previously recruited in the emergency care unit while seeking wound care.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A single center, stratified observational, open label study was performed in the emergency care unit of Donostia Universitary Hospital (recruitment) and in the Biodonostia Health Research Institute (intervention). Scars located in unexposed body areas with the dressing, and scars located in exposed areas with either the gel or the dressing. Investigators assessed interventions at day 1 and on weeks 4, 8 and 12. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and a photographical assessment were used to determine the scars evolution, and the subjective perception of the scar was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to the patients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients whose scars were treated with the silicone gel had an average initial VSS score of 5.4 ± 2.08. This value was reduced to 0.86<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.17 after 90 days of treatment. Patients treated with the polyurethane dressing had an average initial VSS score of 5.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->2.29. After 90 days of treatment, this average score was reduced to 0.33<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.66. Positive evolution of scars was also supported by photographs and by a patient questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Both treatments appear to be safe and effective, objectively, and subjectively, in the context of scar evolution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46453,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130862124000317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To assess the effectiveness and safety of a topical silicone gel (BE + Gel reductor y reparador de cicatrices) and a polyurethane dressing (BE + apósito reductor y reparador de cicatrices) on the evolution of scars of patients who were previously recruited in the emergency care unit while seeking wound care.
Method
A single center, stratified observational, open label study was performed in the emergency care unit of Donostia Universitary Hospital (recruitment) and in the Biodonostia Health Research Institute (intervention). Scars located in unexposed body areas with the dressing, and scars located in exposed areas with either the gel or the dressing. Investigators assessed interventions at day 1 and on weeks 4, 8 and 12. Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and a photographical assessment were used to determine the scars evolution, and the subjective perception of the scar was evaluated by means of a questionnaire administered to the patients.
Results
Patients whose scars were treated with the silicone gel had an average initial VSS score of 5.4 ± 2.08. This value was reduced to 0.86 ± 1.17 after 90 days of treatment. Patients treated with the polyurethane dressing had an average initial VSS score of 5.8 ± 2.29. After 90 days of treatment, this average score was reduced to 0.33 ± 0.66. Positive evolution of scars was also supported by photographs and by a patient questionnaire.
Conclusions
Both treatments appear to be safe and effective, objectively, and subjectively, in the context of scar evolution.
期刊介绍:
Enfermería Clínica is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is a useful and necessary tool for nursing professionals from the different areas of nursing (healthcare, administration, education and research) as well as for healthcare professionals involved in caring for persons, families and the community. It is the only Spanish nursing journal that mainly publishes original research. The aim of the Journal is to promote increased knowledge through the publication of original research and other studies that may help nursing professionals improve their daily practice. This objective is pursued throughout the different sections that comprise the Journal: Original Articles and Short Original Articles, Special Articles, Patient Care and Letters to the Editor. There is also an Evidence-Based Nursing section that includes comments about original articles of special interest written by experts.