Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of refractory anaphylaxis

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY World Allergy Organization Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100944
{"title":"Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of refractory anaphylaxis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Refractory anaphylaxis poses an ongoing, lethal hypersensitivity response that unpredictably involves multiple organs despite appropriate intramuscular (IM) adrenaline injections. Studies on the association of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) concerning anaphylactic severity have yet to be carried out. The study aimed to evaluate the association between blood PLR and NLR levels and refractory anaphylaxis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We carried out a retrospective cross-sectional study in which medical records of patients with anaphylaxis who sought urgent care at the Emergency Department (ED) of Tertiary Hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam, were evaluated. Based on the United Kingdom Resuscitation Council guidelines in 2021, patients were classified as refractory anaphylaxis if they needed more than two appropriate doses of intramuscular adrenaline for anaphylactic symptoms resolution. Clinical data and laboratory results were obtained in the medical records. Logistic regression analysis determined the association between contributing factors and refractory anaphylaxis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One-hundred eighteen adults (age 51.80 ± 18.25 years) were analyzed, including 38 refractory anaphylaxis patients (32.2%). Refractory anaphylaxis patients exhibited notably elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (<em>P</em> = 0.006) and increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) in comparison to non-refractory anaphylaxis patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated an optimal PLR cutoff value of 129.5 (area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.658, sensitivity 73.68%, specificity 61.25%, <em>P</em> = 0.004) and an optimal NLR cutoff value of 4 (AUC 0.736, sensitivity 65.79%, specificity 73.75%, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) for refractory anaphylaxis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a PLR≥129.5 (OR = 4.83, 95% CI: 1.87–12.48) and an NLR≥4 (OR = 4.60, 95% CI: 1.86–11.41) were independently associated with refractory anaphylaxis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Elevated PLR and NLR serve as independent indicators significantly associated with refractory anaphylaxis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54295,"journal":{"name":"World Allergy Organization Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455124000759/pdfft?md5=6b0ac9485144fae069fa1e6aa6fee96f&pid=1-s2.0-S1939455124000759-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Allergy Organization Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1939455124000759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Refractory anaphylaxis poses an ongoing, lethal hypersensitivity response that unpredictably involves multiple organs despite appropriate intramuscular (IM) adrenaline injections. Studies on the association of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) concerning anaphylactic severity have yet to be carried out. The study aimed to evaluate the association between blood PLR and NLR levels and refractory anaphylaxis.

Methods

We carried out a retrospective cross-sectional study in which medical records of patients with anaphylaxis who sought urgent care at the Emergency Department (ED) of Tertiary Hospital in Hanoi, Vietnam, were evaluated. Based on the United Kingdom Resuscitation Council guidelines in 2021, patients were classified as refractory anaphylaxis if they needed more than two appropriate doses of intramuscular adrenaline for anaphylactic symptoms resolution. Clinical data and laboratory results were obtained in the medical records. Logistic regression analysis determined the association between contributing factors and refractory anaphylaxis.

Results

One-hundred eighteen adults (age 51.80 ± 18.25 years) were analyzed, including 38 refractory anaphylaxis patients (32.2%). Refractory anaphylaxis patients exhibited notably elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (P = 0.006) and increased neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P < 0.001) in comparison to non-refractory anaphylaxis patients. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated an optimal PLR cutoff value of 129.5 (area under the ROC curve [AUC] 0.658, sensitivity 73.68%, specificity 61.25%, P = 0.004) and an optimal NLR cutoff value of 4 (AUC 0.736, sensitivity 65.79%, specificity 73.75%, P < 0.001) for refractory anaphylaxis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a PLR≥129.5 (OR = 4.83, 95% CI: 1.87–12.48) and an NLR≥4 (OR = 4.60, 95% CI: 1.86–11.41) were independently associated with refractory anaphylaxis.

Conclusion

Elevated PLR and NLR serve as independent indicators significantly associated with refractory anaphylaxis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测难治性过敏性休克的血小板与淋巴细胞比率和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率
背景难治性过敏性休克是一种持续、致命的超敏反应,尽管已适当注射了肾上腺素,但仍会不可预测地累及多个器官。关于血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与过敏性休克严重程度的关联研究尚未开展。本研究旨在评估血液中 PLR 和 NLR 水平与难治性过敏性休克之间的关系。方法 我们开展了一项回顾性横断面研究,评估了在越南河内市三级医院急诊科(ED)就诊的过敏性休克患者的医疗记录。根据英国复苏委员会 2021 年的指导方针,如果患者需要超过两剂适当的肌肉注射肾上腺素才能缓解过敏性休克症状,则被归类为难治性过敏性休克。临床数据和实验室结果均来自医疗记录。结果 分析了 118 名成年人(年龄 51.80 ± 18.25 岁),其中包括 38 名难治性过敏性休克患者(32.2%)。与非难治性过敏性休克患者相比,难治性过敏性休克患者的血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)明显升高(P = 0.006),中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)明显升高(P < 0.001)。接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)分析表明,难治性过敏性休克的最佳 PLR 临界值为 129.5(ROC 曲线下面积 [AUC] 0.658,敏感性 73.68%,特异性 61.25%,P = 0.004),最佳 NLR 临界值为 4(AUC 0.736,敏感性 65.79%,特异性 73.75%,P <0.001)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,PLR≥129.5(OR = 4.83,95% CI:1.87-12.48)和 NLR≥4 (OR = 4.60,95% CI:1.86-11.41)与难治性过敏性休克独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Allergy Organization Journal
World Allergy Organization Journal Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The official pubication of the World Allergy Organization, the World Allergy Organization Journal (WAOjournal) publishes original mechanistic, translational, and clinical research on the topics of allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, and clincial immunology, as well as reviews, guidelines, and position papers that contribute to the improvement of patient care. WAOjournal publishes research on the growth of allergy prevalence within the scope of single countries, country comparisons, and practical global issues and regulations, or threats to the allergy specialty. The Journal invites the submissions of all authors interested in publishing on current global problems in allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, and immunology. Of particular interest are the immunological consequences of climate change and the subsequent systematic transformations in food habits and their consequences for the allergy/immunology discipline.
期刊最新文献
Time to ACT-UP: Update on precautionary allergen labelling (PAL) Eosinophilic esophagitis and inhalant antigens: Pointing out the roles of allergic rhinitis, immunotherapy and biologic treatment Inverse association between the molecular spreading of IgE to grass pollen and the IgE response to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus among children with seasonal allergic rhinitis Integrated machine learning and bioinformatic analysis of mitochondrial-related signature in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps Epinephrine infusion as an adjuvant treatment for breakthrough reactions during desensitization to methotrexate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1