Administrative monopoly and state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from the fair competition review system in China

IF 7.5 1区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Review of Financial Analysis Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103463
{"title":"Administrative monopoly and state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from the fair competition review system in China","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the impact of administrative monopoly on corporate innovation, specifically focusing on the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) implemented in China. Based on Chinese A-share listed firms from 2012 to 2020, we use the implementation of the FCRS as a natural experiment to conduct a difference-in-difference test. Our findings show that the FCRS significantly increases the level of innovation among SOEs through the mechanisms of resource acquisition and market competition. The incentive effect is not only at the strategic innovation level but also promotes the improvement of the substantive innovation level of SOEs. The heterogeneity test indicates that improvements stemming from the FCRS are more pronounced in specific functional categories, regions with poor business environments, and state-owned enterprises in industries that receive key policy support. Finally, our study also reveals that the FCRS promotes the input-output efficiency of innovation among SOEs. This research contributes to the literature by filling the research gap on the impact of administrative monopoly on corporate innovation, providing novelty evidence on the economic consequences of regulatory administrative monopoly, and offering policy insights regarding the FCRS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48226,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Financial Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Financial Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924003958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of administrative monopoly on corporate innovation, specifically focusing on the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) implemented in China. Based on Chinese A-share listed firms from 2012 to 2020, we use the implementation of the FCRS as a natural experiment to conduct a difference-in-difference test. Our findings show that the FCRS significantly increases the level of innovation among SOEs through the mechanisms of resource acquisition and market competition. The incentive effect is not only at the strategic innovation level but also promotes the improvement of the substantive innovation level of SOEs. The heterogeneity test indicates that improvements stemming from the FCRS are more pronounced in specific functional categories, regions with poor business environments, and state-owned enterprises in industries that receive key policy support. Finally, our study also reveals that the FCRS promotes the input-output efficiency of innovation among SOEs. This research contributes to the literature by filling the research gap on the impact of administrative monopoly on corporate innovation, providing novelty evidence on the economic consequences of regulatory administrative monopoly, and offering policy insights regarding the FCRS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行政垄断与国有企业创新:来自中国公平竞争审查制度的证据
本研究以中国实施的公平竞争审查制度(FCRS)为研究对象,探讨行政垄断对企业创新的影响。我们以 2012 年至 2020 年的中国 A 股上市公司为研究对象,以公平竞争审查制度的实施为自然实验,进行了差分检验。我们的研究结果表明,FCRS 通过资源获取机制和市场竞争机制显著提高了国有企业的创新水平。激励效应不仅体现在战略创新层面,还促进了国有企业实质性创新水平的提高。异质性检验表明,在特定功能类别、经营环境较差的地区以及重点政策扶持行业的国有企业中,FCRS 带来的改善更为明显。最后,我们的研究还揭示出,FCRS 促进了国有企业创新的投入产出效率。本研究填补了行政垄断对企业创新影响的研究空白,提供了监管性行政垄断经济后果的新证据,并为金融监管体制提供了政策启示,从而为相关文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
366
期刊介绍: The International Review of Financial Analysis (IRFA) is an impartial refereed journal designed to serve as a platform for high-quality financial research. It welcomes a diverse range of financial research topics and maintains an unbiased selection process. While not limited to U.S.-centric subjects, IRFA, as its title suggests, is open to valuable research contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Strategic tone management in ESG reports and ESG risk Investigating investor attention to carbon risk from a supply chain perspective Does social responsibility reform curb corporate greenwashing: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China Fee structure and equity fund manager’s optimal locking in profits strategy Beyond the balance sheet: Assessing corporate governance through the Lens of debtholders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1