Why leave items in the shopping cart? The impact of consumer filtering behavior

IF 6.9 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Processing & Management Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103854
Weifen Wu , Xinquan Wang , Qing Xia
{"title":"Why leave items in the shopping cart? The impact of consumer filtering behavior","authors":"Weifen Wu ,&nbsp;Xinquan Wang ,&nbsp;Qing Xia","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Online product information provides crucial cues for consumer shopping behavior; however, the impact of consumer-side information manipulation on non-purchase behavior (e.g., shopping cart abandonment) remains unclear. Filtering, a common manipulation strategy, was initially considered synonymous with searching, both of which contribute to consumer purchase behavior. However, recent research suggests significant differences, particularly in terms of cost and product matching. This study explores how such differences affect information manipulation and subsequently shape shopping cart abandonment, drawing on information foraging theory. Based on the premise that a forager's interaction with the environment is mediated by cognition, we find that consumer filtering behavior influences perceptions of serendipity (i.e., discovering unexpected items) and similarity (i.e., encountering similar items), thereby influencing shopping cart abandonment. Mediation analyses reveal that perceived serendipity and similarity are equally potent mediators. Marginal effects analyses demonstrate that a one standard deviation increase in consumer perceptions of serendipity (similarity) in filtering results increases the likelihood of shopping cart abandonment by 32.2% (22.1%). Theoretical contributions and practical insights for information behavior researchers and digital marketers are also provided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"61 6","pages":"Article 103854"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457324002139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online product information provides crucial cues for consumer shopping behavior; however, the impact of consumer-side information manipulation on non-purchase behavior (e.g., shopping cart abandonment) remains unclear. Filtering, a common manipulation strategy, was initially considered synonymous with searching, both of which contribute to consumer purchase behavior. However, recent research suggests significant differences, particularly in terms of cost and product matching. This study explores how such differences affect information manipulation and subsequently shape shopping cart abandonment, drawing on information foraging theory. Based on the premise that a forager's interaction with the environment is mediated by cognition, we find that consumer filtering behavior influences perceptions of serendipity (i.e., discovering unexpected items) and similarity (i.e., encountering similar items), thereby influencing shopping cart abandonment. Mediation analyses reveal that perceived serendipity and similarity are equally potent mediators. Marginal effects analyses demonstrate that a one standard deviation increase in consumer perceptions of serendipity (similarity) in filtering results increases the likelihood of shopping cart abandonment by 32.2% (22.1%). Theoretical contributions and practical insights for information behavior researchers and digital marketers are also provided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为何将商品留在购物车中?消费者过滤行为的影响
在线产品信息为消费者的购物行为提供了重要线索;然而,消费者方面的信息操纵对非购买行为(如购物车放弃)的影响仍不清楚。过滤是一种常见的操纵策略,最初被认为是搜索的同义词,两者都有助于消费者的购买行为。然而,最近的研究表明两者之间存在显著差异,尤其是在成本和产品匹配方面。本研究借鉴信息觅食理论,探讨这种差异如何影响信息操作,进而形成购物车放弃。基于觅食者与环境的互动是以认知为中介的这一前提,我们发现消费者的筛选行为会影响对偶然性(即发现意想不到的商品)和相似性(即遇到相似的商品)的感知,从而影响购物车的放弃。中介分析表明,偶然性和相似性同样是有效的中介因素。边际效应分析表明,消费者对筛选结果中偶然性(相似性)的感知每增加一个标准差,购物车被放弃的可能性就会增加 32.2% (22.1%)。研究还为信息行为研究人员和数字营销人员提供了理论贡献和实践启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
期刊最新文献
Fuzzy neighborhood rough set-based attribute reduction over temporal information systems with application to clinical efficacy evaluation Empowering open-domain LLMs for legal document correction via legal knowledge integration and decoding constraints CTJANet: A class-task joint-aware network for enhanced few-shot image classification ALC-DRKG: an active learning-based framework for dynamic knowledge graph construction for drug repositioning Measuring stance dynamics in political debate using temporal graph neural networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1