The economic impacts of the rural credit: An analysis of the Brazilian National Family Farming Strengthening Program by biome

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Regional Science Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100115
Rafael Faria de Abreu Campos , Édson Paulo Domingues , Aline Souza Magalhães , Tarik Marques do Prado Tanure
{"title":"The economic impacts of the rural credit: An analysis of the Brazilian National Family Farming Strengthening Program by biome","authors":"Rafael Faria de Abreu Campos ,&nbsp;Édson Paulo Domingues ,&nbsp;Aline Souza Magalhães ,&nbsp;Tarik Marques do Prado Tanure","doi":"10.1016/j.rspp.2024.100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aims to assess the economic impacts of the National Family Farming Strengthening Program (Pronaf) in the various Brazilian biomes. The impacts at the sectoral, regional, and macroeconomic levels, arising from increases in rural credit to farmers in Brazilian territory – family and non-family farmers separately considered –, are carried out using the Computable General Equilibrium model, TERM-Biomas, specially built for analysis of the rural sectors in the Brazilian biomes. The key conclusion is that all regions of the model win, in the most varied magnitudes. Regions with higher participation in family farming production earn more than others. Up to the year 2020, some regions – from the Caatinga biome – show comparative losses. This may be because traditionally family farming regions would have their demands for primary factors more drastically increased, investments and jobs migrate, for example, from those regions of Caatinga. When the results are analyzed in a wider time limit, however, the results suggest general gains. The more vulnerable and specialized in family farming sectors are the regions, the greater the gains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45520,"journal":{"name":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","volume":"16 10","pages":"Article 100115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003172/pdfft?md5=a7b13fecc1c7158278e4697c35815ccc&pid=1-s2.0-S1757780224003172-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Science Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1757780224003172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to assess the economic impacts of the National Family Farming Strengthening Program (Pronaf) in the various Brazilian biomes. The impacts at the sectoral, regional, and macroeconomic levels, arising from increases in rural credit to farmers in Brazilian territory – family and non-family farmers separately considered –, are carried out using the Computable General Equilibrium model, TERM-Biomas, specially built for analysis of the rural sectors in the Brazilian biomes. The key conclusion is that all regions of the model win, in the most varied magnitudes. Regions with higher participation in family farming production earn more than others. Up to the year 2020, some regions – from the Caatinga biome – show comparative losses. This may be because traditionally family farming regions would have their demands for primary factors more drastically increased, investments and jobs migrate, for example, from those regions of Caatinga. When the results are analyzed in a wider time limit, however, the results suggest general gains. The more vulnerable and specialized in family farming sectors are the regions, the greater the gains.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村信贷的经济影响:按生物群落对巴西全国家庭农业强化计划的分析
本研究旨在评估国家加强家庭农业计划(Pronaf)对巴西各生物群落的经济影响。利用专门为分析巴西各生物群落农村部门而建立的可计算一般均衡模型 TERM-Biomas,对巴西境内农民(家庭和非家庭农民分别考虑)增加农村信贷在部门、地区和宏观经济层面产生的影响进行了研究。主要结论是,模型中的所有地区都赢了,而且赢的幅度最大。家庭农业生产参与率较高的地区比其他地区收入更高。到 2020 年,一些地区(来自卡廷加生物群落)显示出相对损失。这可能是因为传统的家庭农业地区对初级要素的需求将大幅增加,投资和工作机会将从卡廷加地区等地转移。不过,如果从更广的时间范围来分析,结果表明总体上是有利的。家庭农业部门越脆弱、越专业的地区,收益就越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Regional Science Policy & Practice (RSPP) is the official policy and practitioner orientated journal of the Regional Science Association International. It is an international journal that publishes high quality papers in applied regional science that explore policy and practice issues in regional and local development. It welcomes papers from a range of academic disciplines and practitioners including planning, public policy, geography, economics and environmental science and related fields. Papers should address the interface between academic debates and policy development and application. RSPP provides an opportunity for academics and policy makers to develop a dialogue to identify and explore many of the challenges facing local and regional economies.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The impact of speed limits on labour sheds in the mountain west United States Regional planning: A failed or flawed project for Africa? Taking advantage of big data science on the horizon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1