Proton therapy toxicity outcomes for localized prostate cancer: Long-term results at a comprehensive cancer center

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100822
Alan J. Sosa , Michael K. Rooney , Howard D. Thames , Jeremiah W. Sanders , David M. Swanson , Seungtaek L. Choi , Quynh-Nhu Nguyen , Henry Mok , Deborah A. Kuban , X. Ron Zhu , Shalin Shah , Lauren L. Mayo , Karen E. Hoffman , Chad Tang , Sean E. McGuire , Narayan Sahoo , Xiaodong Zhang , Andrew K. Lee , Thomas J. Pugh , Usama Mahmood , Steven J. Frank
{"title":"Proton therapy toxicity outcomes for localized prostate cancer: Long-term results at a comprehensive cancer center","authors":"Alan J. Sosa ,&nbsp;Michael K. Rooney ,&nbsp;Howard D. Thames ,&nbsp;Jeremiah W. Sanders ,&nbsp;David M. Swanson ,&nbsp;Seungtaek L. Choi ,&nbsp;Quynh-Nhu Nguyen ,&nbsp;Henry Mok ,&nbsp;Deborah A. Kuban ,&nbsp;X. Ron Zhu ,&nbsp;Shalin Shah ,&nbsp;Lauren L. Mayo ,&nbsp;Karen E. Hoffman ,&nbsp;Chad Tang ,&nbsp;Sean E. McGuire ,&nbsp;Narayan Sahoo ,&nbsp;Xiaodong Zhang ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Lee ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Pugh ,&nbsp;Usama Mahmood ,&nbsp;Steven J. Frank","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Proton therapy (PT) has unique biologic properties with excellent clinical outcomes for the management of localized prostate cancer. Here, we aim to characterize the toxicity of PT for patients with localized prostate cancer and propose mitigation strategies using a large institutional database.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed medical records of 2772 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive PT between May 2006 through January 2020. Disease risk was stratified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as low [LR, n = 640]; favorable-intermediate [F-IR, n = 849]; unfavorable-intermediate [U-IR, n = 851]; high [HR, n = 315]; or very high [VHR, n = 117]. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimates assessed toxicity and freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median follow-up was 7.0 years. The median dose was 78 Gy(RBE)(range: 72–79.2 Gy) in 2.0 Gy(RBE) fractions; 63 % of patients received 78 Gy(RBE) in 39 fractions, and 29 % received 76 Gy(RBE) in 38 fractions. Overall rates of late grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicity were 0.87 % and 1.01 %, respectively. Two patients developed grade 4 late GU toxicity and seven patients with grade 4 late GI toxicity. All patients experiencing severe late grade 4 toxicities were treated to 78 Gy(RBE) in 39 fractions with 80 Gy(RBE) dose to the anterior rectal wall and/or bladder neck. The 10-year FFBR rates for patients with LR to U-IR disease were compared between those treated with 76 and 78 Gy(RBE); the rates were 94.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 92.4–96.0 %) and 93.2 % (95 % CI 91.3–95.7 %), respectively (log-rank p = 0.22).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Proton therapy is associated with low rates of late grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicity. While rare, late grade 4 toxicities occurred in nine (0.3 %) patients. De-escalation to a total dose of 76 Gy(RBE) yields excellent clinical outcomes for patients with LR to U-IR disease with the potential for significant reductions in grade ≥3 late toxicity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100822"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000995/pdfft?md5=cf63f3bd9710b0cb359c0eff9ea7bf11&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000995-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Proton therapy (PT) has unique biologic properties with excellent clinical outcomes for the management of localized prostate cancer. Here, we aim to characterize the toxicity of PT for patients with localized prostate cancer and propose mitigation strategies using a large institutional database.

Methods

We reviewed medical records of 2772 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive PT between May 2006 through January 2020. Disease risk was stratified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines as low [LR, n = 640]; favorable-intermediate [F-IR, n = 849]; unfavorable-intermediate [U-IR, n = 851]; high [HR, n = 315]; or very high [VHR, n = 117]. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier estimates assessed toxicity and freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR).

Results

Median follow-up was 7.0 years. The median dose was 78 Gy(RBE)(range: 72–79.2 Gy) in 2.0 Gy(RBE) fractions; 63 % of patients received 78 Gy(RBE) in 39 fractions, and 29 % received 76 Gy(RBE) in 38 fractions. Overall rates of late grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicity were 0.87 % and 1.01 %, respectively. Two patients developed grade 4 late GU toxicity and seven patients with grade 4 late GI toxicity. All patients experiencing severe late grade 4 toxicities were treated to 78 Gy(RBE) in 39 fractions with 80 Gy(RBE) dose to the anterior rectal wall and/or bladder neck. The 10-year FFBR rates for patients with LR to U-IR disease were compared between those treated with 76 and 78 Gy(RBE); the rates were 94.5 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 92.4–96.0 %) and 93.2 % (95 % CI 91.3–95.7 %), respectively (log-rank p = 0.22).

Conclusions

Proton therapy is associated with low rates of late grade ≥3 GU and GI toxicity. While rare, late grade 4 toxicities occurred in nine (0.3 %) patients. De-escalation to a total dose of 76 Gy(RBE) yields excellent clinical outcomes for patients with LR to U-IR disease with the potential for significant reductions in grade ≥3 late toxicity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部前列腺癌的质子治疗毒性结果:综合癌症中心的长期结果
背景质子治疗(PT)在治疗局部前列腺癌方面具有独特的生物特性和良好的临床效果。我们回顾了 2006 年 5 月至 2020 年 1 月期间接受确定性质子治疗的 2,772 例局部前列腺癌患者的病历。根据美国国立综合癌症网络指南,将疾病风险分为低风险[LR,n = 640];有利-中等风险[F-IR,n = 849];不利-中等风险[U-IR,n = 851];高风险[HR,n = 315];或极高风险[VHR,n = 117]。描述性统计和卡普兰-梅耶估计评估了毒性和生化复发率(FFBR)。中位剂量为78 Gy(RBE)(范围:72-79.2 Gy),分2.0 Gy(RBE)次进行;63%的患者在39次分次中接受了78 Gy(RBE),29%的患者在38次分次中接受了76 Gy(RBE)。晚期≥3级胃肠道和消化道毒性的总体发生率分别为0.87%和1.01%。2名患者出现了4级晚期胃肠道毒性,7名患者出现了4级晚期消化道毒性。所有出现严重晚期4级毒性的患者均接受了78 Gy(RBE)、39分次的治疗,直肠前壁和/或膀胱颈的剂量为80 Gy(RBE)。比较了接受 76 Gy(RBE) 和 78 Gy(RBE) 治疗的 LR 至 U-IR 患者的 10 年 FFBR 率,结果分别为 94.5%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 92.4-96.0%)和 93.2%(95% 置信区间 [CI] 91.3-95.7%)(对数秩 p = 0.22)。晚期4级毒性虽然罕见,但有9名患者(0.3%)出现了晚期4级毒性。将总剂量降至76 Gy(RBE)可为LR至U-IR疾病患者带来极佳的临床疗效,并有可能显著降低晚期≥3级毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy Bridging the care gap: patients’ needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy Tumor sequencing before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Genetic tumor characterization and clinical outcome Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy of brainstem metastases – Clinical outcome and prognostic factors Stereotactic body radiation therapy in primary liver tumor: Local control, outcomes and toxicities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1