CT-based different regions of interest radiomics analysis for acute radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100828
{"title":"CT-based different regions of interest radiomics analysis for acute radiation pneumonitis in patients with locally advanced NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To establish a radiomics model using radiomics features from different region of interests (ROI) based on dosimetry-related regions in enhanced computed tomography (CT) simulated images to predict radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Our retrospective study was conducted based on a cohort of 236 NSCLC patients (59 of them with RP≥2) who were treated in 2 institutions and divided into the primary cohort (n = 182,46 of them with RP≥2) and external validation cohort (n = 54,13 of them with RP≥2). Radiomic features extracted from three ROIs were defined as the whole lung (WL), the dose volume histogram (DVH) of the lung V20 (V20_Lung) and the DVH of the V30 of lung minus the planning target volume (PTV) (V30 Lung-PTV). A total of 107 radiomics features were extracted from each ROIs. The <em>U</em> test, correlation coefficient and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were performed for features selection. Six models based on different classification algorithms were developed to select the best radiomics model (R model).In addition, we built a dosimetry model then combined it with the best R model to create a mixed model (R+D model) The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was delineated to assess the predictive efficacy of the models. Decision curve analysis could benefit from the model proposals through the assessment of clinical utility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the three ROIs, the best R model constructed from the LightGBM algorithm demonstrated the strongest discriminative ability in the ROI of V30 Lung-PTV. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.930 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.829–0.941). The D model, R model and R+D model achieved AUC values of 0.798 (95 %CI: 0.732–0.865), 0.930 (95 %CI: 0.829–0.941) and 0.940 (95 %CI: 0.906–0.974) in primary cohort, and in external validation cohort, the AUC values were 0.793 (95 %CI:0.637–0.949), 0.887 (95 %CI:0.810–0.993), 0.951 (95CI%:0.891–1.000). Decision curve demonstrate that R+D model could benefit for patients through the assessment of clinical utility.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The radiomics model was able to predict the acute RP more effectively in comparison with the traditional dosimetry model. Especially the radiomics model based on the V30 Lung-PTV region was able to achieve a higher accuracy when compared to the other regions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001058/pdfft?md5=306e98b6d77010ad342c0c90833ccfa9&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824001058-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To establish a radiomics model using radiomics features from different region of interests (ROI) based on dosimetry-related regions in enhanced computed tomography (CT) simulated images to predict radiation pneumonitis (RP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Our retrospective study was conducted based on a cohort of 236 NSCLC patients (59 of them with RP≥2) who were treated in 2 institutions and divided into the primary cohort (n = 182,46 of them with RP≥2) and external validation cohort (n = 54,13 of them with RP≥2). Radiomic features extracted from three ROIs were defined as the whole lung (WL), the dose volume histogram (DVH) of the lung V20 (V20_Lung) and the DVH of the V30 of lung minus the planning target volume (PTV) (V30 Lung-PTV). A total of 107 radiomics features were extracted from each ROIs. The U test, correlation coefficient and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were performed for features selection. Six models based on different classification algorithms were developed to select the best radiomics model (R model).In addition, we built a dosimetry model then combined it with the best R model to create a mixed model (R+D model) The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was delineated to assess the predictive efficacy of the models. Decision curve analysis could benefit from the model proposals through the assessment of clinical utility.

Results

Among the three ROIs, the best R model constructed from the LightGBM algorithm demonstrated the strongest discriminative ability in the ROI of V30 Lung-PTV. The corresponding area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.930 (95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.829–0.941). The D model, R model and R+D model achieved AUC values of 0.798 (95 %CI: 0.732–0.865), 0.930 (95 %CI: 0.829–0.941) and 0.940 (95 %CI: 0.906–0.974) in primary cohort, and in external validation cohort, the AUC values were 0.793 (95 %CI:0.637–0.949), 0.887 (95 %CI:0.810–0.993), 0.951 (95CI%:0.891–1.000). Decision curve demonstrate that R+D model could benefit for patients through the assessment of clinical utility.

Conclusion

The radiomics model was able to predict the acute RP more effectively in comparison with the traditional dosimetry model. Especially the radiomics model based on the V30 Lung-PTV region was able to achieve a higher accuracy when compared to the other regions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化疗后局部晚期 NSCLC 患者急性放射性肺炎的 CT 不同感兴趣区放射组学分析
目的根据增强型计算机断层扫描(CT)模拟图像中剂量测量相关区域的不同兴趣区(ROI)的放射组学特征建立放射组学模型,以预测非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的放射性肺炎(RP)。方法我们的回顾性研究基于在两家机构接受治疗的 236 例 NSCLC 患者(其中 59 例 RP≥2),将其分为原发性队列(n = 182,其中 46 例 RP≥2)和外部验证队列(n = 54,其中 13 例 RP≥2)。从三个 ROI 提取的放射组学特征被定义为全肺(WL)、肺 V20 的剂量容积直方图(DVH)(V20_Lung)和肺 V30 的剂量容积直方图减去计划靶体积(PTV)(V30 Lung-PTV)。每个 ROI 共提取 107 个放射组学特征。特征选择采用 U 检验、相关系数和最小绝对缩小和选择算子(LASSO)。此外,我们还建立了一个剂量测定模型,然后将其与最佳 R 模型相结合,创建了一个混合模型(R+D 模型)。结果在三个 ROI 中,由 LightGBM 算法构建的最佳 R 模型在 V30 肺-PTV ROI 中表现出最强的判别能力。相应的曲线下面积(AUC)值为 0.930(95 % 置信区间(CI):0.829-0.941)。D 模型、R 模型和 R+D 模型的 AUC 值分别为 0.798(95 %CI:0.732-0.865)、0.930(95 %CI:0.829-0.941)和 0.940(95 %CI:0.906-0.外部验证队列的 AUC 值分别为 0.793(95 %CI:0.637-0.949)、0.887(95 %CI:0.810-0.993)、0.951(95CI%:0.891-1.000)。结论与传统剂量测定模型相比,放射组学模型能更有效地预测急性 RP。特别是基于 V30 肺-PTV 区域的放射组学模型与其他区域相比,能够达到更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and safety of single-fraction sub-ablative radiotherapy with systemic therapy in colorectal cancer patients with ≤ 10 metastases: A multicenter pilot study (NCT05375708) Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how Reirradiation − still navigating uncharted waters? The impact of rectal spacers in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy Maximum disease diameter is associated with outcomes in stage II follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy alone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1