An eight-year analysis of robotic surgery in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer in a tertiary center in Singapore

{"title":"An eight-year analysis of robotic surgery in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer in a tertiary center in Singapore","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Surgical management of endometrial cancer is a total hysterectomy, bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (THBSO-PLND), which is a challenging surgery in the morbidly obese. Data on morbidly obese women undergoing robotic surgery is limited in Asia. We share our experience in Singapore and aim to demonstrate that robotic surgery is safe and effective in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with BMI &gt; 40 kg/m2, who underwent robotic surgery from January 2016 to September 2023 at the Singapore General Hospital. We recruited a total of 33 patients who underwent robotic surgery for endometrial malignancy and analysed surgical outcomes, operative complications, and survival rates.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average age of patients was 53 years and mean BMI 45.7. The average operative time was 232 min and average blood loss 184 ml. 3 patients had THBSO while 27 underwent THBSO-PLND. None required conversion to laparotomy. 4 patients required a mini-laparotomy for the retrieval of bulky uterus. 12 required adhesiolysis. 6 patients had additional omentectomy done. The average inpatient stay was 4.8 days. The 1-year mortality rate is 0. However, 1 patient passed away 13 months after surgery due to complications from bowel obstruction and another passed away 39 months later due to disease recurrence. 1 patient readmitted on POD6 due to post-op ileus and another for port-site hematoma. Both were managed conservatively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Robotic surgery is a safe and effective alternative surgical tool for women who are morbidly obese with endometrial cancer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37085,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000504/pdfft?md5=533f4891b235450f57d371260dc3bcd9&pid=1-s2.0-S2590161324000504-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590161324000504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical management of endometrial cancer is a total hysterectomy, bilateral salphingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (THBSO-PLND), which is a challenging surgery in the morbidly obese. Data on morbidly obese women undergoing robotic surgery is limited in Asia. We share our experience in Singapore and aim to demonstrate that robotic surgery is safe and effective in morbidly obese women with endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with BMI > 40 kg/m2, who underwent robotic surgery from January 2016 to September 2023 at the Singapore General Hospital. We recruited a total of 33 patients who underwent robotic surgery for endometrial malignancy and analysed surgical outcomes, operative complications, and survival rates.

Results

The average age of patients was 53 years and mean BMI 45.7. The average operative time was 232 min and average blood loss 184 ml. 3 patients had THBSO while 27 underwent THBSO-PLND. None required conversion to laparotomy. 4 patients required a mini-laparotomy for the retrieval of bulky uterus. 12 required adhesiolysis. 6 patients had additional omentectomy done. The average inpatient stay was 4.8 days. The 1-year mortality rate is 0. However, 1 patient passed away 13 months after surgery due to complications from bowel obstruction and another passed away 39 months later due to disease recurrence. 1 patient readmitted on POD6 due to post-op ileus and another for port-site hematoma. Both were managed conservatively.

Conclusion

Robotic surgery is a safe and effective alternative surgical tool for women who are morbidly obese with endometrial cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新加坡一家三级医疗中心对患子宫内膜癌的病态肥胖妇女进行机器人手术的八年分析
导言:子宫内膜癌的手术治疗是全子宫切除术、双侧输卵管切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术(THBSO-PLND),这对病态肥胖者来说是一项具有挑战性的手术。在亚洲,病态肥胖妇女接受机器人手术的数据非常有限。我们分享了在新加坡的经验,旨在证明机器人手术对患有子宫内膜癌的病态肥胖女性是安全有效的。材料与方法我们对2016年1月至2023年9月期间在新加坡中央医院接受机器人手术的BMI > 40 kg/m2患者进行了回顾性分析。我们共招募了33名因子宫内膜恶性肿瘤而接受机器人手术的患者,并对手术结果、手术并发症和存活率进行了分析。结果患者平均年龄为53岁,平均体重指数为45.7。平均手术时间为 232 分钟,平均失血量为 184 毫升。3名患者接受了THBSO手术,27名患者接受了THBSO-PLND手术。没有人需要转为开腹手术。4 名患者需要进行小型开腹手术以取出体积较大的子宫。12 名患者需要进行粘连溶解术。6 名患者进行了额外的卵巢切除术。平均住院时间为 4.8 天。但有一名患者在术后 13 个月因肠梗阻并发症去世,另一名患者在 39 个月后因疾病复发去世。一名患者因术后回肠梗阻而在 POD6 再次入院,另一名患者则因端口部位血肿而再次入院。结论对于患有子宫内膜癌的病态肥胖妇女来说,机器人手术是一种安全有效的替代手术工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Foeto–Maternal outcomes of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks of gestation after induced or spontaneous labour Editorial Board Epidemiology and placental pathology of intrauterine fetal demise in a tertiary hospital in the Philippines Perinatal outcomes in indian women with Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS): Five year experience from a tertiary care centre Postmortem fertilization: New Italian government guidelines affirm the legitimacy of this procedure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1