Impact of mechanical circulatory support on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes stratified by vasoactive-inotropic score: A retrospective cohort study

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100743
Da-Long Chen , Yu-Kai Lin , Chia-Ing Li , Guei-Jane Wang , Kuan-Cheng Chang
{"title":"Impact of mechanical circulatory support on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes stratified by vasoactive-inotropic score: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Da-Long Chen ,&nbsp;Yu-Kai Lin ,&nbsp;Chia-Ing Li ,&nbsp;Guei-Jane Wang ,&nbsp;Kuan-Cheng Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To assess whether mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), can help improve neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective observational cohort study performed in China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. Adult patients with OHCA admitted between January 2015 and June 2023. Quantitative score of vasoactive-inotropic agents and qualitative interventions of MCS, including IABP and ECMO after OHCA. Multivariate regression evaluated the efficacy of each MCS approach in patients stratified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 334 patients were included and analyzed, 122 (36.5%) had favorable neurological outcomes and 215 (64.4%) survived ≥90 days. These patients were stratified by VIS: 0–25, 26–100, 101–250, and &gt;250. In patients with a VIS &gt; 100, ECMO with or without IABP ensured favorable neurological outcomes and survival after OHCA compared to non-MCS interventions (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). For patients with a VIS ≤ 100, IABP alone was beneficial, with no significant outcome difference from non-MCS interventions (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>ECMO with or without IABP therapy may improve post-OHCA neurological outcomes and survival in patients with an expected VIS-24 h &gt; 100 (e.g., epinephrine dose reaches 3 mg during CPR).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100743"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001942/pdfft?md5=392c83af116cfa9a35eca76b35ef4e49&pid=1-s2.0-S2666520424001942-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520424001942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To assess whether mechanical circulatory support (MCS), including intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), can help improve neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods

This is a retrospective observational cohort study performed in China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. Adult patients with OHCA admitted between January 2015 and June 2023. Quantitative score of vasoactive-inotropic agents and qualitative interventions of MCS, including IABP and ECMO after OHCA. Multivariate regression evaluated the efficacy of each MCS approach in patients stratified by the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS).

Results

A total of 334 patients were included and analyzed, 122 (36.5%) had favorable neurological outcomes and 215 (64.4%) survived ≥90 days. These patients were stratified by VIS: 0–25, 26–100, 101–250, and >250. In patients with a VIS > 100, ECMO with or without IABP ensured favorable neurological outcomes and survival after OHCA compared to non-MCS interventions (p < 0.001). For patients with a VIS ≤ 100, IABP alone was beneficial, with no significant outcome difference from non-MCS interventions (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

ECMO with or without IABP therapy may improve post-OHCA neurological outcomes and survival in patients with an expected VIS-24 h > 100 (e.g., epinephrine dose reaches 3 mg during CPR).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械循环支持对院外心脏骤停预后的影响(按血管活性-肌张力评分分层):回顾性队列研究
目的评估机械循环支持(MCS),包括主动脉内球囊反搏泵(IABP)或静脉-动脉体外膜氧合(ECMO),是否有助于改善院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的神经功能预后。对象为 2015 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间入院的 OHCA 成人患者。对 OHCA 后的血管活性-肌动剂和 MCS(包括 IABP 和 ECMO)定性干预进行定量评分。结果 共纳入并分析了 334 名患者,其中 122 人(36.5%)获得了良好的神经功能预后,215 人(64.4%)存活≥90 天。这些患者按 VIS 分层:0-25、26-100、101-250 和 >250。在 VIS 值为 100 的患者中,与非 MCS 干预相比,使用或不使用 IABP 的 ECMO 可确保 OHCA 后良好的神经功能预后和存活率(p <0.001)。结论对于预期 VIS-24 h > 100 的患者(例如,心肺复苏期间肾上腺素剂量达到 3 毫克),ECMO 联合或不联合 IABP 治疗均可改善 OHCA 后的神经功能预后和存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
期刊最新文献
Cricothyroidotomy in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An observational study Does delivering chest compressions to patients who are not in cardiac arrest cause unintentional injury? A systematic review Why physicians use sodium bicarbonate during cardiac arrest: A cross-sectional survey study of adult and pediatric clinicians Application of multi-feature-based machine learning models to predict neurological outcomes of cardiac arrest Associations of long-term hyperoxemia, survival, and neurological outcomes in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients undergoing targeted temperature management: A retrospective observational analysis of the SAVE-J Ⅱ study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1