An Exploration of the Use of Deliberate Practice in Team-Centered Healthcare Simulation-Based Education: An Integrative Review

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Clinical Simulation in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101584
Alan Platt EdD, MSc, PG Dip Ed, BSc (Hons), RGN, LPE. FHEA , Jaden Allan (JA), MSc, PG Dip Ed, BSc (Hons), RN, SFHEA , Claire Leader MA, PGCAP, BSc (Hons), RN, RM, FHEA
{"title":"An Exploration of the Use of Deliberate Practice in Team-Centered Healthcare Simulation-Based Education: An Integrative Review","authors":"Alan Platt EdD, MSc, PG Dip Ed, BSc (Hons), RGN, LPE. FHEA ,&nbsp;Jaden Allan (JA), MSc, PG Dip Ed, BSc (Hons), RN, SFHEA ,&nbsp;Claire Leader MA, PGCAP, BSc (Hons), RN, RM, FHEA","doi":"10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>A key challenge to simulation educators is to find the most effective instructional design that would enhance participant learning.</p></div><div><h3>Aim and Methods</h3><p>An integrative review was undertaken to explore the effects on healthcare practitioners of team-based simulation, underpinned by the deliberate practice framework. This combines well-defined team learning objectives, set at an appropriate level, with opportunities for repetitive team practice under the expert supervision of a coach.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eight articles were identified with six emerging themes: Instructional design features, participants' performance, knowledge, confidence [self-efficacy], and rating/satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The wide variation in the instructional designs, with no standardisation, made comparisons difficult. Nevertheless, studies reported positive benefits in using repeated/repetitive simulation, regardless of the design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48753,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101584"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000768/pdfft?md5=b76f0033e784c10cabfac63ad92fa5de&pid=1-s2.0-S1876139924000768-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Simulation in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876139924000768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A key challenge to simulation educators is to find the most effective instructional design that would enhance participant learning.

Aim and Methods

An integrative review was undertaken to explore the effects on healthcare practitioners of team-based simulation, underpinned by the deliberate practice framework. This combines well-defined team learning objectives, set at an appropriate level, with opportunities for repetitive team practice under the expert supervision of a coach.

Results

Eight articles were identified with six emerging themes: Instructional design features, participants' performance, knowledge, confidence [self-efficacy], and rating/satisfaction.

Conclusions

The wide variation in the instructional designs, with no standardisation, made comparisons difficult. Nevertheless, studies reported positive benefits in using repeated/repetitive simulation, regardless of the design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在以团队为中心的医疗保健模拟教育中使用慎思实践的探索:综合评论
背景模拟教育工作者面临的一个主要挑战是找到最有效的教学设计,以提高参与者的学习效果。目的和方法我们进行了一项综合综述,以探讨以团队为基础的模拟教学对医疗从业人员的影响,该教学以刻意练习框架为基础。该框架结合了明确的团队学习目标(设定在适当的水平)以及在教练的专业指导下进行重复团队练习的机会:结论 教学设计差异很大,没有标准化,因此很难进行比较。尽管如此,研究报告称,无论采用何种设计,使用重复/再现模拟都能带来积极的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Clinical Simulation in Nursing is an international, peer reviewed journal published online monthly. Clinical Simulation in Nursing is the official journal of the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning (INACSL) and reflects its mission to advance the science of healthcare simulation. We will review and accept articles from other health provider disciplines, if they are determined to be of interest to our readership. The journal accepts manuscripts meeting one or more of the following criteria: Research articles and literature reviews (e.g. systematic, scoping, umbrella, integrative, etc.) about simulation Innovative teaching/learning strategies using simulation Articles updating guidelines, regulations, and legislative policies that impact simulation Leadership for simulation Simulation operations Clinical and academic uses of simulation.
期刊最新文献
Competency-based education: Simulation educators, don't be Afraid! These sims are different! Thematic analysis of interdisciplinary faculty experiences designing virtual simulations Medication safety simulation training for anesthesia professionals Perioperative inter-professional education training enhance team performance and readiness Breaking down blood transfusion administration: An in-scenario debriefing simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1