The role of innovative visibility aids on e-scooter riders’ conspicuity in daylight

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.07.024
Galina Komova, Christophe Jallais, Daniel Ndiaye, Joceline Rogé
{"title":"The role of innovative visibility aids on e-scooter riders’ conspicuity in daylight","authors":"Galina Komova,&nbsp;Christophe Jallais,&nbsp;Daniel Ndiaye,&nbsp;Joceline Rogé","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.07.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study explores how different visibility aids of contrasting colours could enhance the e-scooter riders’ conspicuity under daylight conditions.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>With the rise in popularity of shared e-scooter services, an increase in incidents involving e-scooter riders and motorized counterparts was noticed.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>48 licensed drivers (mean age = 24.6 years) detected the e-scooter riders in the videos and images featuring a simulated urban road environment in daylight, while performing a secondary task (n-back). The time to detect standing and moving e-scooter riders and subjective conspicuity ratings were assessed in three visibility aid conditions: Control (grey clothes and grey backpack), Patterned Jacket (jacket and backpack with checkerboard black and yellow pattern) and Wheels-Backpack (yellow stripes on the e-scooter wheels and on a dark backpack).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Improved detectability was observed for e-scooter riders in the Wheels-Backpack condition, resulting in a minimum 168 ms increase in detection time compared to other two conditions. In terms of conspicuity ratings, participants gave higher scores to riders wearing Wheels-Backpack and Patterned Jacket (6.02 and 6.31, respectively, on a Likert 10-point scale), with no significant difference between them. Detection from videos or images showed similar effects. For all of these analyses, Bonferroni post-hoc tests followed a Repeated-measures ANOVA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Distributing contrasting colours across the e-scooter and the rider enhanced their daylight conspicuity better than when contrasting colours were located on the riders’ upper body. However, drivers did not realise that these two visibility aids were not equal in terms of conspicuity benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"106 ","pages":"Pages 44-54"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824001931/pdfft?md5=90a08cfe58b3ff235bef7b1d3381c98c&pid=1-s2.0-S1369847824001931-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824001931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study explores how different visibility aids of contrasting colours could enhance the e-scooter riders’ conspicuity under daylight conditions.

Background

With the rise in popularity of shared e-scooter services, an increase in incidents involving e-scooter riders and motorized counterparts was noticed.

Method

48 licensed drivers (mean age = 24.6 years) detected the e-scooter riders in the videos and images featuring a simulated urban road environment in daylight, while performing a secondary task (n-back). The time to detect standing and moving e-scooter riders and subjective conspicuity ratings were assessed in three visibility aid conditions: Control (grey clothes and grey backpack), Patterned Jacket (jacket and backpack with checkerboard black and yellow pattern) and Wheels-Backpack (yellow stripes on the e-scooter wheels and on a dark backpack).

Results

Improved detectability was observed for e-scooter riders in the Wheels-Backpack condition, resulting in a minimum 168 ms increase in detection time compared to other two conditions. In terms of conspicuity ratings, participants gave higher scores to riders wearing Wheels-Backpack and Patterned Jacket (6.02 and 6.31, respectively, on a Likert 10-point scale), with no significant difference between them. Detection from videos or images showed similar effects. For all of these analyses, Bonferroni post-hoc tests followed a Repeated-measures ANOVA.

Conclusion

Distributing contrasting colours across the e-scooter and the rider enhanced their daylight conspicuity better than when contrasting colours were located on the riders’ upper body. However, drivers did not realise that these two visibility aids were not equal in terms of conspicuity benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新型能见度辅助工具对电动摩托车骑手在日光下的显眼度的作用
背景随着共享电动滑板车服务的普及,人们注意到涉及电动滑板车骑手和机动车骑手的事故有所增加。方法48名持证驾驶员(平均年龄=24.6岁)在执行一项辅助任务(n-back)时,在模拟日光下城市道路环境的视频和图像中检测电动滑板车骑手。在三种能见度辅助条件下,对检测到站立和移动的电动摩托车驾驶员的时间和主观显眼度进行了评估:结果观察到,在车轮-背包条件下,电动滑板车骑行者的可探测性有所提高,与其他两种条件相比,探测时间至少增加了 168 毫秒。在显眼度评分方面,参与者给穿着 "车轮背包 "和 "花纹夹克 "的骑行者打出了更高的分数(分别为 6.02 分和 6.31 分,采用李克特 10 分制),两者之间没有显著差异。通过视频或图像进行的检测也显示出类似的效果。所有这些分析都是在重复测量方差分析之后进行的 Bonferroni 事后检验。然而,驾驶员并没有意识到这两种能见度辅助工具的显著性优势并不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
期刊最新文献
Research on the influencing factors of human Drivers' Trust in fully autonomous vehicles A systematic review of gaming effects on driving related skills Medical cannabis and driving in Australia: Results from the cannabis as medicine survey 2022–2023 (CAMS-22) When driving becomes enjoyable: the role of hedonic motivation and interaction quality in the adoption of autonomous vehicles Exploring user heterogeneity in autonomous vehicle acceptance: A moderated mediation model based on extended TAM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1