A description and outcome evaluation of sacrococcygeal joint radiofrequency neurotomy for treatment of chronic coccydynia – A dorsal approach

Scott WJ. Moorman , Josh Kutcher , Robert Burnham
{"title":"A description and outcome evaluation of sacrococcygeal joint radiofrequency neurotomy for treatment of chronic coccydynia – A dorsal approach","authors":"Scott WJ. Moorman ,&nbsp;Josh Kutcher ,&nbsp;Robert Burnham","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Coccydynia is a condition characterized by pain and tenderness in the coccyx region of the spine. Chronic coccydynia (≥3-months) management remains a clinical challenge. Radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) targeting the sacrococcygeal joint (SCJ) and/or 1st intercoccygeal joint (ICJ) margins has emerged as an alternative, minimally invasive intervention for refractory coccydynia.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an RFN technique targeting the dorsal aspect of SCJ and/or 1st ICJ for treatment of patients with chronic coccydynia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective analysis of prospective outcomes for patients with chronic coccydynia (≥3-months) who underwent RFN to dorsal SCJ and/or 1st ICJ between 2009 - 2023. RFN technique was a dorsal approach targeting the distal sacrum and proximal coccyx, which form the SCJ or 1st ICJ margins. Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Pain Disability Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Spine (PDQQ-S) scores were completed pre- and 3-months post-RFN. Successful RFN was defined as ≥50% reduction or minimal clinical important difference (MCID) in PDQQ-S and NRS pain scores. The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in NRS pain and PDDQ-S scores following primary and repeat RFN to SCJ and/or 1st ICJ. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving MCID on NRS pain and PDQQ-S scores following RFN, as well as mean NRS and PDQQ-S scores pre- and 3-months post-RFN, and magnitude of improvement for patients following successful RFN procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 52 RFN procedures (n = 30 primary, and n = 22 repeat procedures) were performed on 30 patients (female = 25, male = 5, mean age 55.1 ± 13.0yrs). Ten patients (33.3%; 95% CI = 17.3–52.8) reported ≥50% pain reduction as measured by NRS pain and PDQQ-S scores following primary SCJ and/or 1st ICJ RFN at 3-months follow-up. Fifteen patients (50%; 95% CI = 31.3–68.7) reported MCID NRS pain reduction and 12 patients (40.0%; 95% CI = 22.7–59.4) reported MCID PDQQ-S scores at 3-months following primary RFN. The mean magnitude of improvement for patients with primary successful RFN, as defined as ≥50% reduction in either NRS pain or PDQQ-S scores, was 77.4% (±SD 21.4%) and 74.9% (±SD = 19.9%), respectively. Similarly, the mean magnitude of improvement for patients with successful RFN, as defined by MCID reduction in NRS pain or PDQQ-S scores, was 62.6% (±SD = 28.2%) and 69.3% (±SD = 22.3%), respectively. At 3-months follow-up, 14 patients (63.6%; 95% CI = 40.7–82.8) reported ≥50% pain reduction as measured by either NRS pain and PDQQ-S scores following repeat RFN. Nineteen patients (86.4%; 95% CI = 65.1–97.1) reported MCID NRS pain reduction and 16 patients (72.7%; 95% CI = 49.8–89.3) reported MCID PDQQ-S scores at 3-months following repeat RFN. Statistically significant differences were observed between pre- and post-RFN NRS pain and PDQQ-S scores (p &lt; 0.005) in both primary and repeat procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion/conclusion</h3><p>This study represents an introductory step in evaluating the efficacy of a dorsal approach RFN technique targeting the SCJ and/or 1st ICJ as a treatment option for chronic coccydynia. Primary RFN demonstrated pain reduction and improvement in function at 3-months in 33.3% of patients. Several limitations remain, including heterogeneity in patient population, small sample size, and no control groups. Future detailed investigations include cadaveric studies to clarify sensory innervation and enhance reliability of our targets during RFN. Larger prospective studies of long-term outcomes, including comparison with control groups, are required to further evaluate the efficacy of our dorsal RFN approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000529/pdfft?md5=9aaa6430e08777ccc86d021a4466e40b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772594424000529-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Coccydynia is a condition characterized by pain and tenderness in the coccyx region of the spine. Chronic coccydynia (≥3-months) management remains a clinical challenge. Radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) targeting the sacrococcygeal joint (SCJ) and/or 1st intercoccygeal joint (ICJ) margins has emerged as an alternative, minimally invasive intervention for refractory coccydynia.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an RFN technique targeting the dorsal aspect of SCJ and/or 1st ICJ for treatment of patients with chronic coccydynia.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospective outcomes for patients with chronic coccydynia (≥3-months) who underwent RFN to dorsal SCJ and/or 1st ICJ between 2009 - 2023. RFN technique was a dorsal approach targeting the distal sacrum and proximal coccyx, which form the SCJ or 1st ICJ margins. Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Pain Disability Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Spine (PDQQ-S) scores were completed pre- and 3-months post-RFN. Successful RFN was defined as ≥50% reduction or minimal clinical important difference (MCID) in PDQQ-S and NRS pain scores. The primary outcome measures were the proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in NRS pain and PDDQ-S scores following primary and repeat RFN to SCJ and/or 1st ICJ. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving MCID on NRS pain and PDQQ-S scores following RFN, as well as mean NRS and PDQQ-S scores pre- and 3-months post-RFN, and magnitude of improvement for patients following successful RFN procedures.

Results

A total of 52 RFN procedures (n = 30 primary, and n = 22 repeat procedures) were performed on 30 patients (female = 25, male = 5, mean age 55.1 ± 13.0yrs). Ten patients (33.3%; 95% CI = 17.3–52.8) reported ≥50% pain reduction as measured by NRS pain and PDQQ-S scores following primary SCJ and/or 1st ICJ RFN at 3-months follow-up. Fifteen patients (50%; 95% CI = 31.3–68.7) reported MCID NRS pain reduction and 12 patients (40.0%; 95% CI = 22.7–59.4) reported MCID PDQQ-S scores at 3-months following primary RFN. The mean magnitude of improvement for patients with primary successful RFN, as defined as ≥50% reduction in either NRS pain or PDQQ-S scores, was 77.4% (±SD 21.4%) and 74.9% (±SD = 19.9%), respectively. Similarly, the mean magnitude of improvement for patients with successful RFN, as defined by MCID reduction in NRS pain or PDQQ-S scores, was 62.6% (±SD = 28.2%) and 69.3% (±SD = 22.3%), respectively. At 3-months follow-up, 14 patients (63.6%; 95% CI = 40.7–82.8) reported ≥50% pain reduction as measured by either NRS pain and PDQQ-S scores following repeat RFN. Nineteen patients (86.4%; 95% CI = 65.1–97.1) reported MCID NRS pain reduction and 16 patients (72.7%; 95% CI = 49.8–89.3) reported MCID PDQQ-S scores at 3-months following repeat RFN. Statistically significant differences were observed between pre- and post-RFN NRS pain and PDQQ-S scores (p < 0.005) in both primary and repeat procedures.

Discussion/conclusion

This study represents an introductory step in evaluating the efficacy of a dorsal approach RFN technique targeting the SCJ and/or 1st ICJ as a treatment option for chronic coccydynia. Primary RFN demonstrated pain reduction and improvement in function at 3-months in 33.3% of patients. Several limitations remain, including heterogeneity in patient population, small sample size, and no control groups. Future detailed investigations include cadaveric studies to clarify sensory innervation and enhance reliability of our targets during RFN. Larger prospective studies of long-term outcomes, including comparison with control groups, are required to further evaluate the efficacy of our dorsal RFN approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骶尾关节射频神经切断术治疗慢性尾骨痛的描述和疗效评估--背侧法
背景尾骨痛是一种以脊柱尾骨部位疼痛和触痛为特征的疾病。慢性尾骨痛(≥3 个月)的治疗仍是一项临床挑战。针对骶尾关节(SCJ)和/或第一尾骨间关节(ICJ)边缘的射频神经切断术(RFN)已成为治疗难治性尾骨痛的另一种微创干预方法。本研究旨在评估针对 SCJ 和/或第一 ICJ 背侧的 RFN 技术治疗慢性尾骨痛患者的安全性和有效性。方法对 2009-2023 年间接受 SCJ 和/或第一 ICJ 背侧 RFN 治疗的慢性尾骨痛患者(≥3 个月)的前瞻性结果进行回顾性分析。RFN 技术采用背侧入路,以骶骨远端和尾骨近端为目标,这两个部位构成了 SCJ 或第一 ICJ 边缘。RFN前和RFN后3个月完成数字评分量表(NRS)和疼痛残疾生活质量问卷-脊柱(PDQQ-S)评分。PDQQ-S和NRS疼痛评分降低≥50%或最小临床重要差异(MCID)即为RFN成功。主要结果指标是在对 SCJ 和/或第一 ICJ 进行初次和重复 RFN 后,NRS 疼痛和 PDDQ-S 评分降低≥50%的患者比例。次要结果包括 RFN 术后 NRS 疼痛评分和 PDQQ-S 评分达到 MCID 的患者比例、RFN 术前和术后 3 个月的平均 NRS 评分和 PDQQ-S 评分,以及成功 RFN 术后患者的改善程度。10名患者(33.3%;95% CI = 17.3-52.8)在接受初次SCJ和/或第1次ICJ RFN术后3个月随访时,根据NRS疼痛评分和PDQQ-S评分,疼痛减轻了≥50%。15 名患者(50%;95% CI = 31.3-68.7)报告在初级 RFN 治疗 3 个月后,MCID NRS 疼痛减轻,12 名患者(40.0%;95% CI = 22.7-59.4)报告在初级 RFN 治疗 3 个月后,MCID PDQQ-S 得分降低。初治成功的 RFN 患者(定义为 NRS 疼痛或 PDQQ-S 评分降低≥50%)的平均改善幅度分别为 77.4%(±SD 21.4%)和 74.9%(±SD = 19.9%)。同样,以NRS疼痛或PDQQ-S评分的MCID降低为标准,成功RFN患者的平均改善幅度分别为62.6%(±SD = 28.2%)和69.3%(±SD = 22.3%)。在 3 个月的随访中,有 14 名患者(63.6%;95% CI = 40.7-82.8)报告在重复 RFN 治疗后,根据 NRS 疼痛评分和 PDQQ-S 评分,疼痛减轻了≥50%。重复 RFN 治疗 3 个月后,19 名患者(86.4%;95% CI = 65.1-97.1)的 NRS 疼痛评分达到 MCID 标准,16 名患者(72.7%;95% CI = 49.8-89.3)的 PDQQ-S 评分达到 MCID 标准。在初次手术和重复手术中,RFN前后的NRS疼痛和PDQQ-S评分之间存在统计学意义上的重大差异(p < 0.005)。33.3%的患者在接受初级 RFN 治疗 3 个月后疼痛减轻、功能改善。该疗法仍存在一些局限性,包括患者群体的异质性、样本量较小以及没有对照组。未来的详细研究包括尸体研究,以明确感觉神经支配,提高 RFN 期间目标的可靠性。还需要对长期疗效进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,包括与对照组的比较,以进一步评估我们的背侧 RFN 方法的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials. Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Postherpetic neuralgia mimicking lumbar radiculopathy. Comparing the efficacy of intra-articular injection of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) with corticosteroids (CS) in patients with chronic zygapophyseal joint low back pain confirmed by double intra-articular diagnostic blocks: A triple-blinded randomized multicentric controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1