The impact of divorce education programs on co-parental conflict: Review of programs with parent follow-up reports

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES Family Court Review Pub Date : 2024-06-17 DOI:10.1111/fcre.12797
Erin Guyette, Steven M. Harris
{"title":"The impact of divorce education programs on co-parental conflict: Review of programs with parent follow-up reports","authors":"Erin Guyette,&nbsp;Steven M. Harris","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Divorce education programs are often required for divorcing or separating parents with minor children to aid in emotional and practical adjustment. However, there is very little consensus between programs or the evaluation process of programs to demonstrate effectiveness or long-term outcomes. While some short-term evaluations have shown significant results, the identification of programs that demonstrate long-term effects on co-parenting relationships is still missing. Identifying what programs exist with long-term outcomes can help pinpoint what content or structure of programming is impactful on families in divorce transitions. To address this research gap, a systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines to identify what specific and existing divorce education programs have a follow-up report of a minimum of 3 months and demonstrate a reduction of co-parental conflict. Sixteen programs were identified that have at least a minimum 3-month parent follow-up report; only four of these programs demonstrated statistically significant reductions in co-parental conflict. A discussion and critique of the program evaluation articles are within this review.</p>","PeriodicalId":51627,"journal":{"name":"Family Court Review","volume":"62 3","pages":"542-561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fcre.12797","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Court Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fcre.12797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Divorce education programs are often required for divorcing or separating parents with minor children to aid in emotional and practical adjustment. However, there is very little consensus between programs or the evaluation process of programs to demonstrate effectiveness or long-term outcomes. While some short-term evaluations have shown significant results, the identification of programs that demonstrate long-term effects on co-parenting relationships is still missing. Identifying what programs exist with long-term outcomes can help pinpoint what content or structure of programming is impactful on families in divorce transitions. To address this research gap, a systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines to identify what specific and existing divorce education programs have a follow-up report of a minimum of 3 months and demonstrate a reduction of co-parental conflict. Sixteen programs were identified that have at least a minimum 3-month parent follow-up report; only four of these programs demonstrated statistically significant reductions in co-parental conflict. A discussion and critique of the program evaluation articles are within this review.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
离婚教育计划对共同父母冲突的影响:有家长跟踪报告的计划回顾
有未成年子女的离婚或分居父母通常需要参加离婚教育计划,以帮助他们在情感和实际生活中进行调整。然而,在证明计划的有效性或长期成果方面,各计划之间或计划的评估过程之间很少达成共识。虽然一些短期评估显示出了显著的效果,但仍缺少能证明对共同养育关系有长期影响的项目。确定哪些计划具有长期效果,可以帮助确定哪些内容或结构的计划对处于离婚过渡期的家庭有影响。为了填补这一研究空白,我们采用 PRISMA 指南对文献进行了系统性回顾,以确定哪些具体的现有离婚教育计划具有至少 3 个月的跟踪报告,并证明其减少了共同父母之间的冲突。结果发现,有 16 个项目至少有 3 个月的家长随访报告;其中只有 4 个项目在统计学上显著减少了父母间的冲突。本综述对项目评估文章进行了讨论和评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Issue Information A call to action: Every family deserves active efforts. Keeping the black family together-active efforts as the standard for all removal and reunification efforts Cheating the evidence to get to best interest and the presumption of unfitness Lies my child welfare system has told me: The critical importance of centering families' voices in family policing legal advocacy Unbundling marriage law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1