Toward designing a lightweight RFID authentication protocol for constrained environments

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IET Communications Pub Date : 2024-06-22 DOI:10.1049/cmu2.12794
Nasser Zarbi, Ali Zaeembashi, Nasour Bagheri, Morteza Adeli
{"title":"Toward designing a lightweight RFID authentication protocol for constrained environments","authors":"Nasser Zarbi,&nbsp;Ali Zaeembashi,&nbsp;Nasour Bagheri,&nbsp;Morteza Adeli","doi":"10.1049/cmu2.12794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In present times, Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) systems have seen a significant rise in their usage. There has been an increasing interest in developing even lighter RFID protocols suitable for resource-constrained environments. Ensuring security and privacy remain critical challenges in RFID-based systems. Recently proposed lightweight authentication schemes, namely LRSAS+ and LRARP+, are ideally suited for constrained devices. However, this article investigates these schemes and reveals certain vulnerabilities: LRSAS+ is susceptible to tag impersonation, desynchronization, and traceability attacks, while LRARP+ can fall prey to traceability and secret disclosure attacks. An enhanced version of these authentication systems is proposed that tackles their inherent weaknesses by leveraging the <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>χ</mi>\n <mi>p</mi>\n <mi>e</mi>\n <mi>r</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\chi per$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> function. To verify the security of the proposed scheme, a formal analysis is conducted using Gong–Needham–Yahalom logic (GNY logic) and an automated security protocol verification tool, ProVerif. The improved scheme's effectiveness is also compared with multiple contemporary lightweight systems. The results indicate that the enhanced scheme not only meets the security requirements for lightweight authentication schemes but also achieves this with minimal computational overhead.</p>","PeriodicalId":55001,"journal":{"name":"IET Communications","volume":"18 14","pages":"846-859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/cmu2.12794","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Communications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/cmu2.12794","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In present times, Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) systems have seen a significant rise in their usage. There has been an increasing interest in developing even lighter RFID protocols suitable for resource-constrained environments. Ensuring security and privacy remain critical challenges in RFID-based systems. Recently proposed lightweight authentication schemes, namely LRSAS+ and LRARP+, are ideally suited for constrained devices. However, this article investigates these schemes and reveals certain vulnerabilities: LRSAS+ is susceptible to tag impersonation, desynchronization, and traceability attacks, while LRARP+ can fall prey to traceability and secret disclosure attacks. An enhanced version of these authentication systems is proposed that tackles their inherent weaknesses by leveraging the χ p e r $\chi per$ function. To verify the security of the proposed scheme, a formal analysis is conducted using Gong–Needham–Yahalom logic (GNY logic) and an automated security protocol verification tool, ProVerif. The improved scheme's effectiveness is also compared with multiple contemporary lightweight systems. The results indicate that the enhanced scheme not only meets the security requirements for lightweight authentication schemes but also achieves this with minimal computational overhead.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为受限环境设计轻量级 RFID 验证协议
当前,射频识别(RFID)系统的使用率大幅上升。人们对开发适合资源有限环境的更轻便的 RFID 协议越来越感兴趣。在基于 RFID 的系统中,确保安全性和隐私性仍是关键挑战。最近提出的轻量级认证方案,即 LRSAS+ 和 LRARP+,非常适合受限设备。然而,本文对这些方案进行了研究,并揭示了某些漏洞:LRSAS+ 容易受到标签冒充、不同步和可追踪性攻击,而 LRARP+ 则可能受到可追踪性和秘密泄露攻击。本文提出了这些认证系统的增强版,通过利用 χ p e r $\chi per$ 函数来解决其固有的弱点。为了验证所提方案的安全性,我们使用 Gong-Needham-Yahalom 逻辑(GNY 逻辑)和自动安全协议验证工具 ProVerif 进行了形式分析。此外,还将改进方案的有效性与多个当代轻量级系统进行了比较。结果表明,改进后的方案不仅能满足轻量级身份验证方案的安全要求,而且能以最小的计算开销实现这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IET Communications
IET Communications 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
220
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: IET Communications covers the fundamental and generic research for a better understanding of communication technologies to harness the signals for better performing communication systems using various wired and/or wireless media. This Journal is particularly interested in research papers reporting novel solutions to the dominating problems of noise, interference, timing and errors for reduction systems deficiencies such as wasting scarce resources such as spectra, energy and bandwidth. Topics include, but are not limited to: Coding and Communication Theory; Modulation and Signal Design; Wired, Wireless and Optical Communication; Communication System Special Issues. Current Call for Papers: Cognitive and AI-enabled Wireless and Mobile - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_COM_CFP_CAWM.pdf UAV-Enabled Mobile Edge Computing - https://digital-library.theiet.org/files/IET_COM_CFP_UAV.pdf
期刊最新文献
A deep learning-based approach for pseudo-satellite positioning Analysis of interference effect in VL-NOMA network considering signal power parameters performance An innovative model for an enhanced dual intrusion detection system using LZ-JC-DBSCAN, EPRC-RPOA and EG-GELU-GRU A high-precision timing and frequency synchronization algorithm for multi-h CPM signals Dual-user joint sensing and communications with time-divisioned bi-static radar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1