Impact of split nitrogen applications on nitrate leaching and maize yield in irrigated loamy sand soils of Northeast Nebraska

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1002/agg2.20554
Arshdeep Singh, Daran Rudnick, Daniel D. Snow, Christopher Proctor, Laila Puntel, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"Impact of split nitrogen applications on nitrate leaching and maize yield in irrigated loamy sand soils of Northeast Nebraska","authors":"Arshdeep Singh,&nbsp;Daran Rudnick,&nbsp;Daniel D. Snow,&nbsp;Christopher Proctor,&nbsp;Laila Puntel,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.1002/agg2.20554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little information is available on optimizing the number of nitrogen (N) splits based on nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub>-N) leaching and maize yield in sandy soils. To address this gap, we evaluated the impact of multiple N splits (2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-N splits) on NO<sub>3</sub>-N leaching and maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.) grain yield in irrigated loamy sand soil at a producer site in the Bazile Groundwater Management Area of Northeast Nebraska. Porous suction cup lysimeters were installed at a depth of 120 cm to collect pore water samples from 23 leaching events in 2021, a dry year. Increasing the number of N-splits did not affect the pore-water NO<sub>3</sub>-N concentration; however, it was 169%, 152%, 150%, and 129% higher in 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-N split treatments compared to control, that is, without N application. Though the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-N splits had 110%, 71%, 120%, and 91% higher area-based NO<sub>3</sub>-N leaching than the control, less deep percolation and more evapotranspiration in control led to no significant differences in area-based NO<sub>3</sub>-N leaching among all treatments. All N-splits resulted in higher maize yield, nitrogen use efficiency, plant N uptake, harvest index, and aboveground biomass than control; however, the number of N-splits did not affect these parameters. The inclusion of environmental cost reduced the return to nitrogen by 92–143 $ ha<sup>−1</sup> across all N-split treatments but did not significantly affect the differences among the splits. Overall, the results indicate that increasing the number of N-splits does not provide agronomic, economic, and environmental benefits in irrigated maize fields during a dry year.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20554","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little information is available on optimizing the number of nitrogen (N) splits based on nitrate (NO3-N) leaching and maize yield in sandy soils. To address this gap, we evaluated the impact of multiple N splits (2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-N splits) on NO3-N leaching and maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield in irrigated loamy sand soil at a producer site in the Bazile Groundwater Management Area of Northeast Nebraska. Porous suction cup lysimeters were installed at a depth of 120 cm to collect pore water samples from 23 leaching events in 2021, a dry year. Increasing the number of N-splits did not affect the pore-water NO3-N concentration; however, it was 169%, 152%, 150%, and 129% higher in 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-N split treatments compared to control, that is, without N application. Though the 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-N splits had 110%, 71%, 120%, and 91% higher area-based NO3-N leaching than the control, less deep percolation and more evapotranspiration in control led to no significant differences in area-based NO3-N leaching among all treatments. All N-splits resulted in higher maize yield, nitrogen use efficiency, plant N uptake, harvest index, and aboveground biomass than control; however, the number of N-splits did not affect these parameters. The inclusion of environmental cost reduced the return to nitrogen by 92–143 $ ha−1 across all N-split treatments but did not significantly affect the differences among the splits. Overall, the results indicate that increasing the number of N-splits does not provide agronomic, economic, and environmental benefits in irrigated maize fields during a dry year.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内布拉斯加州东北部灌溉壤质砂土中分次施氮对硝酸盐沥滤和玉米产量的影响
关于根据硝酸盐(NO3-N)淋失和沙质土壤中玉米产量来优化氮(N)分配次数的信息很少。为了填补这一空白,我们在内布拉斯加州东北部巴兹尔地下水管理区的一个生产基地,评估了多种氮分施(2-、3-、4-和 5-N 分施)对灌溉壤质沙土中 NO3-N 沥滤和玉米(玉米)籽粒产量的影响。在 120 厘米深处安装了多孔吸盘溶样器,以收集 2021 年(干旱年)23 次沥滤事件的孔隙水样本。增加氮分施次数并未影响孔隙水 NO3-N 浓度;但与对照组(即不施氮)相比,2-、3-、4-和 5-N 分施处理的 NO3-N 浓度分别高出 169%、152%、150% 和 129%。虽然 2-、3-、4-和 5-N 分离处理的 NO3-N 沥滤面积分别比对照高出 110%、71%、120% 和 91%,但对照中较少的深层渗滤和较多的蒸腾作用导致所有处理的 NO3-N 沥滤面积没有显著差异。与对照相比,所有分氮肥处理的玉米产量、氮利用效率、植物氮吸收量、收获指数和地上生物量都更高;然而,分氮肥处理的次数并不影响这些参数。在所有氮肥分施处理中,环境成本的加入使氮肥回报率降低了 92-143 美元/公顷,但并未显著影响分施处理之间的差异。总之,研究结果表明,在干旱年份,增加分氮次数并不能为灌溉玉米田带来农艺、经济和环境效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploration of barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) accessions for yield and yield components from diverse agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia Genotypic variation in nitrogen fixation characteristics in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under contrasting phosphorus fertilizer regimes Limestone reaction in sandy soil: Rate effects, limestone type, moisture regime, and time Irrigation frequency effects on Prizm zoysiagrass establishment from sprigs Evaluating corn, tall fescue and canola growth on sediments dredged from the Lorain Harbor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1