Content validation study on the Advanced Practice Role Delineation Tool

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q2 NURSING International Journal of Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1111/ijn.13295

Krista Jokiniemi RN, PhD, Michael Ackerman DNS, RN, FCCM, FNAP, FAANP, FAAN, Laura Hako RN, CNS, MSc, PhD Student, Anna-Maija Pietilä RN

{"title":"Content validation study on the Advanced Practice Role Delineation Tool","authors":"Krista Jokiniemi RN, PhD, Michael Ackerman DNS, RN, FCCM, FNAP, FAANP, FAAN, Laura Hako RN, CNS, MSc, PhD Student, Anna-Maija Pietilä RN","doi":"10.1111/ijn.13295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Role understanding and practice standards become extremely important in countries that are developing and assessing nursing and advanced practice nursing (APN) roles.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To describe the process and findings of a content validation study conducted on the Advanced Practice Role Delineation (APRD) tool in a Finnish context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A tool content validation study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Between September and October 2019, three rounds of surveys (n = 9, n = 8, n = 5) were conducted to assess the content validity of the APRD tool. Furthermore, a thorough literature review was conducted in December 2020 to examine how the tool has been used and validated between January 2000 and December 2020.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A 45-item amendment of the APRD tool was created. The Scale Content Validity Index Average of 0.97 reflects excellent content validity. A literature review of 15 studies revealed that the tool has been used by many researchers, yet there is limited research on its content and construct.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The steps taken in this study were effective and may be replicated in other countries. Further studies are needed to validate the content and structure of the developed 45-item modification of the APRD tool.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijn.13295","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.13295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Role understanding and practice standards become extremely important in countries that are developing and assessing nursing and advanced practice nursing (APN) roles.

Aim

To describe the process and findings of a content validation study conducted on the Advanced Practice Role Delineation (APRD) tool in a Finnish context.

Design

A tool content validation study.

Method

Between September and October 2019, three rounds of surveys (n = 9, n = 8, n = 5) were conducted to assess the content validity of the APRD tool. Furthermore, a thorough literature review was conducted in December 2020 to examine how the tool has been used and validated between January 2000 and December 2020.

Results

A 45-item amendment of the APRD tool was created. The Scale Content Validity Index Average of 0.97 reflects excellent content validity. A literature review of 15 studies revealed that the tool has been used by many researchers, yet there is limited research on its content and construct.

Conclusion

The steps taken in this study were effective and may be replicated in other countries. Further studies are needed to validate the content and structure of the developed 45-item modification of the APRD tool.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

高级实践角色划分工具内容验证研究。

背景：目的：描述在芬兰环境下对高级实践角色划分（APRD）工具进行内容验证研究的过程和结果：工具内容验证研究：2019年9月至10月期间，进行了三轮调查（n = 9、n = 8、n = 5），以评估APRD工具的内容有效性。此外，2020 年 12 月还进行了一次全面的文献回顾，以研究 2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间该工具的使用和验证情况：结果：对 APRD 工具进行了 45 个项目的修订。量表内容效度指数平均值为 0.97，反映出内容效度极佳。对 15 项研究的文献回顾显示，该工具已被许多研究人员使用，但对其内容和结构的研究却很有限：本研究中采取的措施是有效的，可以在其他国家推广。需要开展进一步研究，以验证所开发的 45 个项目的 APRD 工具修订版的内容和结构。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Nursing Practice NURSING-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.