Femoral cartilage thickness measured on MRI varies among individuals: Time to deepen one of the principles of kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A systematic review.

Abstract

Purpose: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA), as a pure resurfacing procedure, is based on matching implant thickness with bone cut and kerf thickness, plus cartilage wear. However, the assumption of a consistent 2 mm femoral cartilage thickness remains unproven. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature concerning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment of femoral cartilage thickness in non-arthritic patients. Our hypothesis was that cartilage thickness values would vary significantly among individuals, thereby challenging the established KA paradigm of 'one-cartilage-fits-all'.

Methods: Systematic literature searches (Pubmed, Scopus and Cochrane Library) followed PRISMA guidelines. English-language studies assessing distal and posterior femoral cartilage thickness using MRI in non-arthritic adults were included. Studies lacking numerical cartilage thickness data, involving post-operative MRI, considering total femoro-tibial cartilage thickness, or failing to specify the compartment of the knee being studied were excluded.

Results: Overall, 27 studies comprising 8170 MRIs were analysed. Weighted mean femoral cartilage thicknesses were: 2.05 ± 0.62 mm (mean range 1.06-2.6) for the distal medial condyle, 1.95 ± 0.4 mm (mean range 1.15-2.5) for the distal lateral condyle, 2.44 ± 0.5 mm (mean range 1.37-2.6) for the posterior medial condyle and 2.27 ± 0.38 mm (mean range 1.48-2.5) for the posterior lateral condyle.

Discussion: Femoral cartilage thickness varies significantly across patients. In KA TKA, relying on a fixed thickness of 2 mm may jeopardize the accurate restoration of individual anatomy, leading to errors in implant coronal and rotational alignment. An intraoperative assessment of cartilage thickness may be advisable to express the KA philosophy at its full potential.

Level of evidence: Level IV.