Christine Ortega, Jeffrey D Simpson, Luke Donovan, Lauren Forsyth, Danielle M Torp, Rachel M Koldenhoven
{"title":"Gait Training Interventions for Individuals with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Christine Ortega, Jeffrey D Simpson, Luke Donovan, Lauren Forsyth, Danielle M Torp, Rachel M Koldenhoven","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0499.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review aimed to determine if gait training interventions influence lower extremity biomechanics during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE to identify English-language studies from inception through September 2022. Eligible studies included randomized control trials, repeated measures design, and descriptive laboratory studies measuring the effects during or following a gait training intervention on biomechanical outcomes (kinematics, kinetics, electromyography) during walking in individuals with CAI. Gait training interventions were broadly categorized into devices (destabilization devices, novel gait training device) and biofeedback (visual, auditory, and haptic delivery modes). Meta-analyses were conducted when appropriate using random-effects to compare pre-and post- gait training intervention mean differences and standard deviations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for single session gait training studies only. Eleven studies reported kinetic outcomes. Our meta-analyses showed location of center of pressure (COP) was shifted medially from 0-90% (Effect Size [ES] range=0.35-0.82) of stance, contact time was decreased in medial forefoot (ES=0.43), peak pressure was decreased for lateral midfoot (ES=1.18) and increased for hallux (ES=0.59), pressure time integral was decreased for lateral heel (ES=0.33) and lateral midfoot (ES=1.22) and increased for hallux (ES=0.63). Three studies reported kinematic outcomes. Seven studies reported electromyography outcomes. Our meta-analyses revealed increased activity following initial contact (IC) for fibularis longus (ES=0.83).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gait training protocols improved some lower extremity biomechanical outcomes in individuals with CAI. Plantar pressure outcome measures seem to be most impacted by gait training programs with improvements in decreasing lateral pressure associated with increased risk for lateral ankle sprains. Gait training increased EMG activity post-IC for the fibularis longus. Few studies have assessed the impact of multi-session gait training on biomechanical outcome measures. Targeted gait trainning should be considered when treating patients with CAI.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0499.23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This review aimed to determine if gait training interventions influence lower extremity biomechanics during walking in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI).
Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE to identify English-language studies from inception through September 2022. Eligible studies included randomized control trials, repeated measures design, and descriptive laboratory studies measuring the effects during or following a gait training intervention on biomechanical outcomes (kinematics, kinetics, electromyography) during walking in individuals with CAI. Gait training interventions were broadly categorized into devices (destabilization devices, novel gait training device) and biofeedback (visual, auditory, and haptic delivery modes). Meta-analyses were conducted when appropriate using random-effects to compare pre-and post- gait training intervention mean differences and standard deviations.
Results: Thirteen studies were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for single session gait training studies only. Eleven studies reported kinetic outcomes. Our meta-analyses showed location of center of pressure (COP) was shifted medially from 0-90% (Effect Size [ES] range=0.35-0.82) of stance, contact time was decreased in medial forefoot (ES=0.43), peak pressure was decreased for lateral midfoot (ES=1.18) and increased for hallux (ES=0.59), pressure time integral was decreased for lateral heel (ES=0.33) and lateral midfoot (ES=1.22) and increased for hallux (ES=0.63). Three studies reported kinematic outcomes. Seven studies reported electromyography outcomes. Our meta-analyses revealed increased activity following initial contact (IC) for fibularis longus (ES=0.83).
Conclusions: Gait training protocols improved some lower extremity biomechanical outcomes in individuals with CAI. Plantar pressure outcome measures seem to be most impacted by gait training programs with improvements in decreasing lateral pressure associated with increased risk for lateral ankle sprains. Gait training increased EMG activity post-IC for the fibularis longus. Few studies have assessed the impact of multi-session gait training on biomechanical outcome measures. Targeted gait trainning should be considered when treating patients with CAI.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries.
The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.