Provision of digital devices and internet connectivity to improve synchronous telemedicine access in the U.S.: a systematic scoping review.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2024.1408170
Joshua Bell, Laura M Gottlieb, Courtney R Lyles, Oanh Kieu Nguyen, Sara L Ackerman, Emilia H De Marchis
{"title":"Provision of digital devices and internet connectivity to improve synchronous telemedicine access in the U.S.: a systematic scoping review.","authors":"Joshua Bell, Laura M Gottlieb, Courtney R Lyles, Oanh Kieu Nguyen, Sara L Ackerman, Emilia H De Marchis","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1408170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic increase in telemedicine use for direct patient care. Inequities in device/internet access can limit the extent to which patients can engage with telemedicine care and exacerbate health disparities. In this review, we examined existing literature on interventions designed to improve patient telemedicine access by providing digital devices including tablets, smartphones, and computers and/or internet connectivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic scoping review, we searched four databases for peer-reviewed studies published 1/1/2000-10/19/2021 that described healthcare interventions that provided patients with devices and/or internet connectivity and reported outcomes related to telemedicine access and/or usage. Data extraction elements included: study population, setting, intervention design, details on device/connectivity provision, and outcomes evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve articles reflecting seven unique interventions met inclusion criteria. Ten articles examined telemedicine utilization (83%) and reported improved patient show rates/utilization. Seven articles examined patient satisfaction with the interventions (58%) and reported positive experiences. Fewer articles examined health outcomes (17%; 2/12) though these also demonstrated positive results. Across included studies, study quality was low. There were no controlled trials, and the most rigorously designed studies (<i>n</i> = 4) involved pre/post-intervention assessments.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings from this review indicate that providing material technology supports to patients can facilitate telemedicine access, is acceptable to patients and clinicians, and can contribute to improved health outcomes. The low number and quality of existing studies limits the strength of this evidence. Future research should explore interventions that can increase equitable access to telemedicine services.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=183442, identifier, PROSPERO: CRD42020183442.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1408170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a dramatic increase in telemedicine use for direct patient care. Inequities in device/internet access can limit the extent to which patients can engage with telemedicine care and exacerbate health disparities. In this review, we examined existing literature on interventions designed to improve patient telemedicine access by providing digital devices including tablets, smartphones, and computers and/or internet connectivity.

Methods: In this systematic scoping review, we searched four databases for peer-reviewed studies published 1/1/2000-10/19/2021 that described healthcare interventions that provided patients with devices and/or internet connectivity and reported outcomes related to telemedicine access and/or usage. Data extraction elements included: study population, setting, intervention design, details on device/connectivity provision, and outcomes evaluated.

Results: Twelve articles reflecting seven unique interventions met inclusion criteria. Ten articles examined telemedicine utilization (83%) and reported improved patient show rates/utilization. Seven articles examined patient satisfaction with the interventions (58%) and reported positive experiences. Fewer articles examined health outcomes (17%; 2/12) though these also demonstrated positive results. Across included studies, study quality was low. There were no controlled trials, and the most rigorously designed studies (n = 4) involved pre/post-intervention assessments.

Discussion: Findings from this review indicate that providing material technology supports to patients can facilitate telemedicine access, is acceptable to patients and clinicians, and can contribute to improved health outcomes. The low number and quality of existing studies limits the strength of this evidence. Future research should explore interventions that can increase equitable access to telemedicine services.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=183442, identifier, PROSPERO: CRD42020183442.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国提供数字设备和互联网连接以改善同步远程医疗访问:系统性范围界定综述。
导言:COVID-19 大流行导致远程医疗在直接患者护理中的使用急剧增加。设备/互联网访问方面的不平等会限制患者参与远程医疗护理的程度,并加剧健康差距。在本综述中,我们研究了旨在通过提供数字设备(包括平板电脑、智能手机、电脑和/或互联网连接)改善患者远程医疗使用的干预措施的现有文献:在这一系统性的范围界定综述中,我们检索了四个数据库,以查找发表于 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 19 日的同行评审研究,这些研究描述了为患者提供设备和/或互联网连接的医疗保健干预措施,并报告了与远程医疗访问和/或使用相关的结果。数据提取要素包括:研究人群、环境、干预设计、提供设备/连接的详细信息以及评估结果:结果:12 篇文章反映了七种独特的干预措施,符合纳入标准。十篇文章对远程医疗的使用情况进行了研究(83%),并报告了患者表演率/使用率的提高情况。七篇文章考察了患者对干预措施的满意度(58%),并报告了积极的体验。对健康结果进行研究的文章较少(17%;2/12),尽管这些文章也展示了积极的结果。在所有纳入的研究中,研究质量较低。没有对照试验,设计最严格的研究(n = 4)涉及干预前/后评估:讨论:本综述的研究结果表明,为患者提供物质技术支持可促进远程医疗的使用,患者和临床医生都能接受,并有助于改善健康状况。现有研究数量少、质量低,限制了这一证据的力度。未来的研究应探索可增加公平获得远程医疗服务机会的干预措施。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=183442,标识符,PROSPERO:CRD42020183442。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A machine learning approach towards assessing consistency and reproducibility: an application to graft survival across three kidney transplantation eras. Attitudes and perceptions of Chinese oncologists towards artificial intelligence in healthcare: a cross-sectional survey. Smartphone-based drug testing in the hands of patients with substance-use disorder-a usability study. Imaging biobanks: operational limits, medical-legal and ethical reflections. Developing and testing a community based, online vs. face-to-face peer led intervention to improve mental well-being in Cambodian adults with physical disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1