The role of body image dissatisfaction in the relationship between body size and disordered eating and self-harm: complimentary Mendelian randomization and mediation analyses

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Molecular Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1038/s41380-024-02676-5
Grace M. Power, Naomi Warne, Helen Bould, Francesco Casanova, Samuel E. Jones, Tom G. Richardson, Jessica Tyrrell, George Davey Smith, Jon Heron
{"title":"The role of body image dissatisfaction in the relationship between body size and disordered eating and self-harm: complimentary Mendelian randomization and mediation analyses","authors":"Grace M. Power, Naomi Warne, Helen Bould, Francesco Casanova, Samuel E. Jones, Tom G. Richardson, Jessica Tyrrell, George Davey Smith, Jon Heron","doi":"10.1038/s41380-024-02676-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Disordered eating and self-harm commonly co-occur in young people suggesting potential for shared underlying causes. Body image dissatisfaction (BID) has been recognised as a psychological correlate of body size, associated with both disordered eating and self-harm. However, the investigation into etiological pathways early in the lifecourse to provide detail on how body size and BID may foster disordered eating and self-harm remains largely unexplored. Employing data from two large population-based cohorts, the UK Biobank and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents And Children (ALSPAC), we conducted bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) to determine the causal direction of effect between genetically predicted prepubertal body size and two measures of BID indicating (i) desire to be smaller, and (ii) desire to be larger. We then used multivariable regression followed by counterfactual mediation analyses. Bidirectional MR indicated robust evidence that increased genetically predicted prepubertal body size increased desire to be smaller and decreased desire to be larger. Evidence for the reverse causal direction was negligible. These findings remained very similar across sensitivity analyses. In females and males, multivariable regression analyses demonstrated that being overweight increased the risk of disordered eating (risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19, 1.01 to 1.40 and 1.98, 1.28 to 3.05, respectively) and self-harm (RR, 95% CI: 1.35, 1.04 to 1.77 and 1.55, 0.86 to 2.81, respectively), while being underweight was protective against disordered eating (RR, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.40 to 0.81 and 0.81, 0.38 to 1.73, respectively). There was weak evidence of an increase in the risk of self-harm among underweight individuals. Mediation analyses indicated that the relationship between being overweight and subsequent disordered eating was largely mediated by the desire to be smaller. Our research carries important public health implications, suggesting distinct risk profiles for self-harm and disordered eating in relation to weight and body image. In addition, a better understanding of genetically predicted prepubertal BID may be valuable in the prevention and treatment of disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19008,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02676-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disordered eating and self-harm commonly co-occur in young people suggesting potential for shared underlying causes. Body image dissatisfaction (BID) has been recognised as a psychological correlate of body size, associated with both disordered eating and self-harm. However, the investigation into etiological pathways early in the lifecourse to provide detail on how body size and BID may foster disordered eating and self-harm remains largely unexplored. Employing data from two large population-based cohorts, the UK Biobank and the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents And Children (ALSPAC), we conducted bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) to determine the causal direction of effect between genetically predicted prepubertal body size and two measures of BID indicating (i) desire to be smaller, and (ii) desire to be larger. We then used multivariable regression followed by counterfactual mediation analyses. Bidirectional MR indicated robust evidence that increased genetically predicted prepubertal body size increased desire to be smaller and decreased desire to be larger. Evidence for the reverse causal direction was negligible. These findings remained very similar across sensitivity analyses. In females and males, multivariable regression analyses demonstrated that being overweight increased the risk of disordered eating (risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19, 1.01 to 1.40 and 1.98, 1.28 to 3.05, respectively) and self-harm (RR, 95% CI: 1.35, 1.04 to 1.77 and 1.55, 0.86 to 2.81, respectively), while being underweight was protective against disordered eating (RR, 95% CI: 0.57, 0.40 to 0.81 and 0.81, 0.38 to 1.73, respectively). There was weak evidence of an increase in the risk of self-harm among underweight individuals. Mediation analyses indicated that the relationship between being overweight and subsequent disordered eating was largely mediated by the desire to be smaller. Our research carries important public health implications, suggesting distinct risk profiles for self-harm and disordered eating in relation to weight and body image. In addition, a better understanding of genetically predicted prepubertal BID may be valuable in the prevention and treatment of disordered eating and self-harm in adolescence.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
身体形象不满意在体型与饮食失调和自残之间的关系中的作用:孟德尔随机化和中介分析的互补性
进食障碍和自我伤害通常同时发生在青少年身上,这表明两者可能有共同的内在原因。身体形象不满意(BID)已被认为是身体尺寸的心理相关因素,与饮食失调和自残都有关联。然而,对生命历程早期的病因途径进行调查,以提供有关身体尺寸和身体形象不满意如何导致饮食失调和自残的详细信息,在很大程度上仍未得到探索。利用英国生物库(UK Biobank)和雅芳父母与儿童纵向研究(ALSPAC)这两个大型人群队列的数据,我们进行了双向孟德尔随机化(MR),以确定遗传预测的青春期前体型与两种 BID 测量之间的因果影响方向,这两种 BID 测量分别表示(i)希望体型更小;(ii)希望体型更大。然后,我们进行了多变量回归和反事实中介分析。双向 MR 显示,有强有力的证据表明,遗传预测的青春期前体型增大会增加变小的欲望,并降低变大的欲望。反向因果关系的证据可以忽略不计。这些结果在敏感性分析中仍然非常相似。在女性和男性中,多变量回归分析表明,超重会增加饮食紊乱的风险(风险比 (RR),95% 置信区间 (CI):分别为 1.19、1.01 至 1.40 和 1.98、1.28 至 3.05)。体重过轻对饮食紊乱具有保护作用(风险比,95% 置信区间分别为 0.57、0.40 至 0.81 和 0.81、0.38 至 1.73)。有微弱证据表明,体重不足的人自我伤害的风险会增加。中介分析表明,超重与随后的饮食失调之间的关系在很大程度上是由想要变小的愿望中介的。我们的研究具有重要的公共卫生意义,表明自残和饮食紊乱的风险与体重和身体形象有关。此外,更好地了解青春期前BID的遗传预测可能对预防和治疗青春期饮食紊乱和自残很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Psychiatry
Molecular Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
459
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Psychiatry focuses on publishing research that aims to uncover the biological mechanisms behind psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The journal emphasizes studies that bridge pre-clinical and clinical research, covering cellular, molecular, integrative, clinical, imaging, and psychopharmacology levels.
期刊最新文献
Genetic and functional analyses of CTBP2 in anorexia nervosa and body weight regulation Peripartum allopregnanolone blood concentrations and depressive symptoms: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis Cortico-limbic volume abnormalities in late life depression are distinct from β amyloid and white matter pathologies Neuroimaging-based variability in subtyping biomarkers for psychiatric heterogeneity White matter microstructure in obesity and bipolar disorders: an ENIGMA bipolar disorder working group study in 2186 individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1