Wow! Interjections Improve Chatbot Performance: The Mediating Role of Anthropomorphism and Perceived Listening

IF 4.9 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Communication Research Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1177/00936502241273259
Ben Sheehan, Hyun Seung Jin, Brett Martin, Hyoje Jay Kim
{"title":"Wow! Interjections Improve Chatbot Performance: The Mediating Role of Anthropomorphism and Perceived Listening","authors":"Ben Sheehan, Hyun Seung Jin, Brett Martin, Hyoje Jay Kim","doi":"10.1177/00936502241273259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Could a subtle shift in the language used by chatbots improve service interactions? This research suggests that a chatbot’s use of interjections (e.g., “wow” and “hmm”), can shape consumer attitudes and behaviors. Four experiments demonstrate that consumers are more satisfied, more willing to purchase, and more likely to remain loyal when chatbots use interjections. The studies find support for a sequential mediation model where interjections increase anthropomorphism, which in-turn increases perceived listening and then impacts consumer responses. Consumers respond positively to interjections because they feel the chatbot is more human-like, and thus capable of attending to them and understanding their needs. This interjection effect holds across a range of consumer contexts and at different stages of the purchasing process. The findings shed light on why anthropomorphism has a positive effect in human-chatbot interactions, while providing a straightforward means of enhancing customer satisfaction, purchase intent, and loyalty.","PeriodicalId":48323,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241273259","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Could a subtle shift in the language used by chatbots improve service interactions? This research suggests that a chatbot’s use of interjections (e.g., “wow” and “hmm”), can shape consumer attitudes and behaviors. Four experiments demonstrate that consumers are more satisfied, more willing to purchase, and more likely to remain loyal when chatbots use interjections. The studies find support for a sequential mediation model where interjections increase anthropomorphism, which in-turn increases perceived listening and then impacts consumer responses. Consumers respond positively to interjections because they feel the chatbot is more human-like, and thus capable of attending to them and understanding their needs. This interjection effect holds across a range of consumer contexts and at different stages of the purchasing process. The findings shed light on why anthropomorphism has a positive effect in human-chatbot interactions, while providing a straightforward means of enhancing customer satisfaction, purchase intent, and loyalty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哇插话提高了聊天机器人的性能:拟人化与感知倾听的中介作用
聊天机器人所用语言的微妙变化能否改善服务互动?这项研究表明,聊天机器人使用的插入语(如 "哇 "和 "嗯")可以影响消费者的态度和行为。四项实验表明,当聊天机器人使用插入语时,消费者会更满意、更愿意购买,也更有可能保持忠诚度。研究发现,插话增加了拟人化程度,而拟人化程度反过来又增加了可感知的倾听程度,进而影响消费者的反应。消费者会对插话做出积极反应,因为他们觉得聊天机器人更像人类,因此能够关注他们并了解他们的需求。这种插话效应适用于各种消费者情境和购买过程的不同阶段。研究结果揭示了拟人化在人类与聊天机器人互动中产生积极影响的原因,同时提供了一种提高客户满意度、购买意向和忠诚度的直接方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Communication Research
Communication Research COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Empirical research in communication began in the 20th century, and there are more researchers pursuing answers to communication questions today than at any other time. The editorial goal of Communication Research is to offer a special opportunity for reflection and change in the new millennium. To qualify for publication, research should, first, be explicitly tied to some form of communication; second, be theoretically driven with results that inform theory; third, use the most rigorous empirical methods; and fourth, be directly linked to the most important problems and issues facing humankind. Critieria do not privilege any particular context; indeed, we believe that the key problems facing humankind occur in close relationships, groups, organiations, and cultures.
期刊最新文献
Personality, Attachment, and Pornography: A Meta-Analysis Expansion and Exploration of the Superdiffuser Model With Agent-Based Modeling “I’ll Change My Beliefs When I See It”: Video Fact Checks Outperform Text Fact Checks in Correcting Misperceptions Among Those Holding False or Uncertain Pre-Existing Beliefs “None of Us Wanted to be at This Party, But What a Guest List”: How Technology Workers Position Themselves on LinkedIn Following Layoffs Caught Within the Family System: An Examination of Emerging Adults’ Dilemmas in Navigating Sibling Depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1