On the parsimony, interpretability and predictive capability of a physically−based model in the optical domain for estimating soil moisture content

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Geoderma Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116996
Zheyue Zhang , Yiyun Chen , Kaixin Wu , Yongsheng Hong , Tiezhu Shi , Abdul Mounem Mouazen
{"title":"On the parsimony, interpretability and predictive capability of a physically−based model in the optical domain for estimating soil moisture content","authors":"Zheyue Zhang ,&nbsp;Yiyun Chen ,&nbsp;Kaixin Wu ,&nbsp;Yongsheng Hong ,&nbsp;Tiezhu Shi ,&nbsp;Abdul Mounem Mouazen","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil moisture plays an important role in the transpiration, evaporation and plant growth processes at the land surface-atmosphere interface. Optical remote sensing has great potential for the retrieval of surface soil moisture content (SMC), with many empirical data-driven models or physical models developed to address this issue. Nevertheless, most data-driven models face the challenge of poor interpretability, while the application of many existing physical models is limited by complicated calibration steps. The aim of this work is to validate the potential of a physically-based approach based on the Kubelka-Munk (KM) radiative transfer theory to strike a balance between physical significance and practical applicability in the optical estimation of SMC. Specifically, an adequate and heterogeneous soil dataset in Jianghan Plain, China was used to calibrate the model wavelength by wavelength under laboratory conditions. The performance of the approach (at the optimal band) was compared with several commonly used methods. The effect of soil organic matter (SOM) on the estimation of SMC was also investigated by validating the model transferability between subsets with different SOM levels. Results showed that there were two local optimal bands at around 1460 and 1940 nm in the full band analysis of the approach, and the performance at around 1940 nm is better or comparable to linear regression, logarithmic regression, and spectral index models. Although partial least squares regression (PLSR) could achieve higher prediction accuracy with the enrichment of band information, this approach stood out for its balance of model parsimony with single-band calibration, model interpretability with the incorporation of physical mechanisms and predictive capability. More importantly, we found that the approach could enhance the spectral sensitivity in the water absorption region, avoid negative predictions at low SMCs, and reduce the interference effect of SOM on the estimation of SMC, probably due to the physical constraints inside the approach. This paper demonstrates the parsimony, interpretability, and predictive capability of the physically-based approach in the optical estimation of SMC, and provides new insights into the application of this approach in the airborne/satellite imaginary spectroscopy sensing of SMC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002258/pdfft?md5=a62189e9c900e258ba6b12d559e42f18&pid=1-s2.0-S0016706124002258-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706124002258","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil moisture plays an important role in the transpiration, evaporation and plant growth processes at the land surface-atmosphere interface. Optical remote sensing has great potential for the retrieval of surface soil moisture content (SMC), with many empirical data-driven models or physical models developed to address this issue. Nevertheless, most data-driven models face the challenge of poor interpretability, while the application of many existing physical models is limited by complicated calibration steps. The aim of this work is to validate the potential of a physically-based approach based on the Kubelka-Munk (KM) radiative transfer theory to strike a balance between physical significance and practical applicability in the optical estimation of SMC. Specifically, an adequate and heterogeneous soil dataset in Jianghan Plain, China was used to calibrate the model wavelength by wavelength under laboratory conditions. The performance of the approach (at the optimal band) was compared with several commonly used methods. The effect of soil organic matter (SOM) on the estimation of SMC was also investigated by validating the model transferability between subsets with different SOM levels. Results showed that there were two local optimal bands at around 1460 and 1940 nm in the full band analysis of the approach, and the performance at around 1940 nm is better or comparable to linear regression, logarithmic regression, and spectral index models. Although partial least squares regression (PLSR) could achieve higher prediction accuracy with the enrichment of band information, this approach stood out for its balance of model parsimony with single-band calibration, model interpretability with the incorporation of physical mechanisms and predictive capability. More importantly, we found that the approach could enhance the spectral sensitivity in the water absorption region, avoid negative predictions at low SMCs, and reduce the interference effect of SOM on the estimation of SMC, probably due to the physical constraints inside the approach. This paper demonstrates the parsimony, interpretability, and predictive capability of the physically-based approach in the optical estimation of SMC, and provides new insights into the application of this approach in the airborne/satellite imaginary spectroscopy sensing of SMC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论光学领域基于物理的土壤含水量估算模型的解析性、可解释性和预测能力
土壤水分在地表-大气界面的蒸腾、蒸发和植物生长过程中发挥着重要作用。光学遥感在检索地表土壤水分含量(SMC)方面具有巨大潜力,许多经验数据驱动模型或物理模型都是为解决这一问题而开发的。然而,大多数数据驱动模型都面临着可解释性差的挑战,而许多现有物理模型的应用则受到复杂校准步骤的限制。这项工作的目的是验证基于库贝尔卡-蒙克(KM)辐射传递理论的物理方法的潜力,以便在 SMC 光学估算的物理意义和实际适用性之间取得平衡。具体而言,在实验室条件下,利用中国江汉平原的一个充足的异质土壤数据集对该模型进行逐波长校准。该方法(在最佳波段)的性能与几种常用方法进行了比较。通过验证模型在不同 SOM 水平子集之间的可移植性,研究了土壤有机质(SOM)对 SMC 估算的影响。结果表明,在该方法的全波段分析中,1460 nm 和 1940 nm 附近有两个局部最优波段,1940 nm 附近的性能优于或相当于线性回归、对数回归和光谱指数模型。虽然偏最小二乘回归(PLSR)可以通过丰富波段信息获得更高的预测精度,但这种方法在单波段校准的模型简约性、模型的可解释性以及物理机制和预测能力之间取得了平衡,因而脱颖而出。更重要的是,我们发现该方法可以提高水吸收区的光谱灵敏度,避免低 SMC 时的负预测,并减少 SOM 对 SMC 估计的干扰效应,这可能是由于该方法内部的物理约束。本文证明了基于物理的方法在 SMC 光学估算中的解析性、可解释性和预测能力,并为该方法在机载/卫星假想光谱传感 SMC 中的应用提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
期刊最新文献
Monitoring soil cracking using OFDR-based distributed temperature sensing framework Depth impacts on the aggregate-mediated mechanisms of root carbon stabilization in soil: Trade-off between MAOM and POM pathways Can inert pool models improve predictions of biochar long-term persistence in soils? Impact of a synthetic zeolite mixed with soils of different pedological characteristics on soil physical quality indices Driving factors of variation in fertilizer nitrogen recovery efficiency in maize cropping systems across China and its microbial mechanism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1