Multivariable linear model for predicting graft weight based on 3-dimensional volumetry in regards to body weight change of living liver donor: an observational cohort study.
Seungwook Han, Jinsoo Rhu, Soyoung Lim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jong Man Kim, Jae-Won Joh
{"title":"Multivariable linear model for predicting graft weight based on 3-dimensional volumetry in regards to body weight change of living liver donor: an observational cohort study.","authors":"Seungwook Han, Jinsoo Rhu, Soyoung Lim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Jong Man Kim, Jae-Won Joh","doi":"10.4174/astr.2024.107.2.91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to build a prediction model for estimating graft weight about different graft volumetry methods combined with other variables.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Donors who underwent living-donor right hepatectomy from March 2021 to March 2023 were included. Estimated graft volume measured by conventional method and 3-dimensional (3D) software were collected as well as the actual graft weight. Linear regression was used to build a prediction model. Donor groups were divided according to the 3D volumetry of <700 cm<sup>3</sup>, 700-899 cm<sup>3</sup>, and ≥900 cm<sup>3</sup> to compare the performance of different models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 119 donors were included. Conventional volumetry showed R<sup>2</sup> of 0.656 (P < 0.001) while 3D software showed R<sup>2</sup> of 0.776 (P < 0.001). The R<sup>2</sup> of the multivariable model was 0.842 (P < 0.001) including for 3D volume (β = 0.623, P < 0.001), body mass index (β = 7.648, P < 0.001), and amount of weight loss (β = -7.252, P < 0.001). The median errors between different models and actual graft weight did not differ in donor groups (<700 and 700-899 cm<sup>3</sup>), while the median error of univariable linear model using 3D software (122.5; interquartile range [IQR], 61.5-179.8) was significantly higher than multivariable-adjusted linear model (41.5; IQR, 24.8-69.8; P = 0.003) in donors with estimated graft weight ≥900 cm<sup>3</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The univariable 3D volumetry model showed an acceptable outcome for donors with an estimated graft volume <900 cm<sup>3</sup>. For donors with an estimated graft volume ≥900 cm<sup>3</sup>, the multivariable-adjusted linear model showed higher accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8071,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2024.107.2.91","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to build a prediction model for estimating graft weight about different graft volumetry methods combined with other variables.
Methods: Donors who underwent living-donor right hepatectomy from March 2021 to March 2023 were included. Estimated graft volume measured by conventional method and 3-dimensional (3D) software were collected as well as the actual graft weight. Linear regression was used to build a prediction model. Donor groups were divided according to the 3D volumetry of <700 cm3, 700-899 cm3, and ≥900 cm3 to compare the performance of different models.
Results: A total of 119 donors were included. Conventional volumetry showed R2 of 0.656 (P < 0.001) while 3D software showed R2 of 0.776 (P < 0.001). The R2 of the multivariable model was 0.842 (P < 0.001) including for 3D volume (β = 0.623, P < 0.001), body mass index (β = 7.648, P < 0.001), and amount of weight loss (β = -7.252, P < 0.001). The median errors between different models and actual graft weight did not differ in donor groups (<700 and 700-899 cm3), while the median error of univariable linear model using 3D software (122.5; interquartile range [IQR], 61.5-179.8) was significantly higher than multivariable-adjusted linear model (41.5; IQR, 24.8-69.8; P = 0.003) in donors with estimated graft weight ≥900 cm3.
Conclusion: The univariable 3D volumetry model showed an acceptable outcome for donors with an estimated graft volume <900 cm3. For donors with an estimated graft volume ≥900 cm3, the multivariable-adjusted linear model showed higher accuracy.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts to the Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research (Ann Surg Treat Res) should be written in English according to the instructions for authors. If the details are not described below, the style should follow the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publications available at International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) website (http://www.icmje.org).