Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ciencia & saude coletiva Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-23 DOI:10.1590/1413-81232024298.19282022
Juliana Chaves Coelho, Mayra Cristina da Luz Pádua Guimarães, Ana Katly Martins Gualberto Vaz, Karina Cardoso Meira, Juliano Dos Santos, Renata Jae Won Lee, Luciano Ferreira Drager, Angela Maria Geraldo Pierin
{"title":"Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Juliana Chaves Coelho, Mayra Cristina da Luz Pádua Guimarães, Ana Katly Martins Gualberto Vaz, Karina Cardoso Meira, Juliano Dos Santos, Renata Jae Won Lee, Luciano Ferreira Drager, Angela Maria Geraldo Pierin","doi":"10.1590/1413-81232024298.19282022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article aims to evaluate the adherence to antihypertensive treatment prevalence in the Brazilian population based on peer-reviewed studies which used instruments exclusively designed and/or adapted for this purpose. A systematic review with meta-analysis based on the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search was carried out in the BDENF, SciELO, Cuiden, PsycINFOe, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, and MEDLINE databases, as well as the AgeLine, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect academic search engines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021292689). Random effects models were used for a meta-analysis of the prevalence obtained from individual studies. A total of 104 studies were included in the meta-analysis on antihypertensive treatment in the Brazilian population, totaling 38,299 patients. The most used instrument was the four-item Morisky-Green Test (49.5%). The adherence prevalence estimated by the meta-analysis was 44.4% (95%CI: 39.12%-49.94%, I2 = 91.17, p < 0.001), showing high heterogeneity. The adherence to antihypertensive treatment prevalence found in national studies was unsatisfactory, demonstrating that this problem continues to be a major challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"29 8","pages":"e19282022"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232024298.19282022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims to evaluate the adherence to antihypertensive treatment prevalence in the Brazilian population based on peer-reviewed studies which used instruments exclusively designed and/or adapted for this purpose. A systematic review with meta-analysis based on the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search was carried out in the BDENF, SciELO, Cuiden, PsycINFOe, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, and MEDLINE databases, as well as the AgeLine, Google Scholar and ScienceDirect academic search engines. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021292689). Random effects models were used for a meta-analysis of the prevalence obtained from individual studies. A total of 104 studies were included in the meta-analysis on antihypertensive treatment in the Brazilian population, totaling 38,299 patients. The most used instrument was the four-item Morisky-Green Test (49.5%). The adherence prevalence estimated by the meta-analysis was 44.4% (95%CI: 39.12%-49.94%, I2 = 91.17, p < 0.001), showing high heterogeneity. The adherence to antihypertensive treatment prevalence found in national studies was unsatisfactory, demonstrating that this problem continues to be a major challenge.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西降压药物治疗的依从性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文旨在根据同行评审的研究结果,评估巴西人口中坚持降压治疗的普遍性,这些研究使用了专门为此目的设计和/或改编的工具。根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)的建议进行了系统综述和元分析。检索范围包括 BDENF、SciELO、Cuiden、PsycINFOe、CINAHL、Embase、LILACS 和 MEDLINE 数据库,以及 AgeLine、Google Scholar 和 ScienceDirect 学术搜索引擎。研究方案已在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42021292689)。随机效应模型用于对单项研究的患病率进行荟萃分析。共有 104 项关于巴西人群降压治疗的研究被纳入荟萃分析,患者总数达 38 299 人。使用最多的工具是四项莫里斯基-格林测验(49.5%)。荟萃分析估计的依从率为 44.4%(95%CI:39.12%-49.94%,I2 = 91.17,p < 0.001),显示出高度异质性。国内研究发现的降压治疗依从性并不令人满意,这表明这一问题仍是一个重大挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ciencia & saude coletiva
Ciencia & saude coletiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
533
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
[Cooperative Intelligence Platform for Primary Health Care (Picaps): techno-scientific solutions in digital health to confront COVID-19 and other crises]. [Dictatorship, Health and Propaganda: The National Immunization Program (PNI) and the media campaign for compulsory vaccination]. [Doctors of the dictatorship: physicians and human rights violations in Brazil (1964-1985)]. [Health care under the military government (1964-1985) and its legacy for the SUS: the public-private hybrid Unified Health System]. [Impure blood: specialists, institutions, and cultural authority in the context of AIDS in Brazil].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1