Prognosis in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Reperfused by PHDP: 1-Year MACEs Follow-Up.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/10760296241271394
Jie Dou, Jie Gao, Hui-Hui Yang, Ruoling Guo, Chao Jiang, Jiang Zhou, Xiaomei Yu, Jingtao Guo, Jinlong Zhang, Donglei Luo
{"title":"Prognosis in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Reperfused by PHDP: 1-Year MACEs Follow-Up.","authors":"Jie Dou, Jie Gao, Hui-Hui Yang, Ruoling Guo, Chao Jiang, Jiang Zhou, Xiaomei Yu, Jingtao Guo, Jinlong Zhang, Donglei Luo","doi":"10.1177/10760296241271394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored 1-year follow-up of Parmaco-invasive strategy with half-dose recombinant human prourokinase (PHDP) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The follow-up endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurring within 30 days and 1 year, as well as postoperative bleeding events. The study ultimately included 150 subjects, with 75 in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) group and 75 in the PHDP group. This study found that the PHDP group had a shorter FMC-reperfusion time (42.00 min vs 96.00 min, P < 0.001). During PCI, the PHDP group had a lower percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (<i>P </i>= 0.021), intropin (<i>P </i>= 0.002) and tirofiban (<i>P </i>< 0.001) use. And the incidence of intraoperative arrhythmia, malignant arrhythmia, and slow flow/no-reflow was lower in the PHDP group (<i>P </i>< 0.001). At the 30-day follow-up, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the PPCI group who were readmitted due to unstable angina (<i>P </i>= 0.037). After 1 year of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in MACEs between the two groups (<i>P </i>= 0.500). The incidence of postoperative major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and minor bleeding did not differ between the PHDP and PPCI groups (<i>P </i>> 0.05). The PHDP facilitates early treatment of infarct-related vessels, shortens FMC-reperfusion time, and does not increase the risk of MACEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10335,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","volume":"30 ","pages":"10760296241271394"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241271394","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored 1-year follow-up of Parmaco-invasive strategy with half-dose recombinant human prourokinase (PHDP) in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The follow-up endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) occurring within 30 days and 1 year, as well as postoperative bleeding events. The study ultimately included 150 subjects, with 75 in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) group and 75 in the PHDP group. This study found that the PHDP group had a shorter FMC-reperfusion time (42.00 min vs 96.00 min, P < 0.001). During PCI, the PHDP group had a lower percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) (P = 0.021), intropin (P = 0.002) and tirofiban (P < 0.001) use. And the incidence of intraoperative arrhythmia, malignant arrhythmia, and slow flow/no-reflow was lower in the PHDP group (P < 0.001). At the 30-day follow-up, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients in the PPCI group who were readmitted due to unstable angina (P = 0.037). After 1 year of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in MACEs between the two groups (P = 0.500). The incidence of postoperative major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and minor bleeding did not differ between the PHDP and PPCI groups (P > 0.05). The PHDP facilitates early treatment of infarct-related vessels, shortens FMC-reperfusion time, and does not increase the risk of MACEs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者经 PHDP 再灌注后的预后:1 年 MACEs 随访。
这项研究探讨了在急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中使用半剂量重组人普鲁鲁激酶(PHDP)的Parmaco介入策略的1年随访情况。随访终点是30天和1年内发生的主要心血管不良事件(MACE)以及术后出血事件。该研究最终纳入了150名受试者,其中75人属于一级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)组,75人属于PHDP组。该研究发现,PHDP 组的 FMC 再灌注时间(42.00 分钟 vs 96.00 分钟,P P = 0.021)、intropin(P = 0.002)和替罗非班(P P = 0.037)更短。随访一年后,两组患者的 MACEs 差异无统计学意义(P = 0.500)。术后大出血、颅内出血和轻微出血的发生率在 PHDP 组和 PPCI 组之间没有差异(P > 0.05)。PHDP有助于早期治疗梗死相关血管,缩短FMC再灌注时间,并且不会增加MACEs风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
150
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CATH is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal that addresses the practical clinical and laboratory issues involved in managing bleeding and clotting disorders, especially those related to thrombosis, hemostasis, and vascular disorders. CATH covers clinical trials, studies on etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of thrombohemorrhagic disorders.
期刊最新文献
Correlation Between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio with Risk Stratification Indicators and Thrombus Burden in Patients with Moderate-to-High Risk Acute Pulmonary Embolism, and Changes After Treatment Advanced Machine Learning Models for Predicting Post-Thrombolysis Hemorrhagic Transformation in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Three-Year Outcomes, Risk Factors for Restenosis After Stenting for DVT Combined with Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome Thanks to Reviewers Anti-Xa Monitoring of Apixaban (ZyQuis) in Venous Thrombo-Embolism and Atrial Fibrillation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1