Removable regulating sutures during trabeculectomy for a safer and more effective intraocular pressure control.

Abstract

PurposeComparing the effect of standard trabeculectomy with direct sutures versus trabeculectomy with compression and everting sutures.MethodsMono-centric randomized prospective comparative study on 38 glaucomatous eyes undergoing trabeculectomy: 19 with standard fixed sutures (group A) and 19 withremovable regulating sutures (group B). Preoperatively and at day-7, 1-month, 2-months, 3-months and 6-months after surgery, we recorded best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and possible complications. Complete, partial success and failure rates were recorded at the end of the study.ResultsIn group B, we pulled everting sutures with the "horse bridle" technique at the 14^th day, and successively removed all sutures between the 14^th-30^th post-operative day. At month-1, we recorded a significant IOP reduction in both groups (mean reduction of 11.5 mmHg for group A and of 14.4 mmHg for Group B, p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Furthermore, group B showed a significantly lower IOP than group A (-4.2 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.0 to -0.5 mmHg for group B, p = 0.01). At 2, 3 and 6-months, no significant IOP differences were reported between the two groups (all p > 0.05), but failure rate was higher for group A (21%) than for group B (11%). No differences in visual outcomes at any timepoints were noted.ConclusionsTrabeculectomy with removable regulating sutures showed a good safety profile, comparable to standard trabeculectomy. Moreover, we reported a lower IOP one month postoperatively, suggesting this technique may optimize early management of trabeculectomy.