Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for adult screening

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101240
Hadley Stevens Smith , Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich , Jill Oliver Robinson , Ariel N. Levchenko , Sarah A. Classen , Janet Malek , Adam H. Buchanan , Barbara Biesecker , Kyle B. Brothers , Benjamin S. Wilfond , Christine Rini , Cinnamon S. Bloss , Amy L. McGuire , Sara J. Knight
{"title":"Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for adult screening","authors":"Hadley Stevens Smith ,&nbsp;Caryn Kseniya Rubanovich ,&nbsp;Jill Oliver Robinson ,&nbsp;Ariel N. Levchenko ,&nbsp;Sarah A. Classen ,&nbsp;Janet Malek ,&nbsp;Adam H. Buchanan ,&nbsp;Barbara Biesecker ,&nbsp;Kyle B. Brothers ,&nbsp;Benjamin S. Wilfond ,&nbsp;Christine Rini ,&nbsp;Cinnamon S. Bloss ,&nbsp;Amy L. McGuire ,&nbsp;Sara J. Knight","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>As population-based screening programs to identify genetic conditions in adults using genomic sequencing (GS) are increasingly available, validated patient-centered outcome measures are needed to understand participants’ experience. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument to assess the perceived utility of GS in the context of adult screening.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Informed by a 5-domain conceptual model, we used a 5-step approach to instrument development and validation: (1) item writing, (2) cognitive testing, (3) pilot testing and item reduction, (4) psychometric testing, and (5) evaluation of construct validity. Adults undergoing risk-based or population-based GS who had received GS results as part of ongoing research studies participated in structured cognitive interviews and 2 rounds of surveys. After item pool refinement, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis and calculated Pearson correlations with related instruments.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We derived the 18-item Adult Screening version of the GENEtic Utility scale (total sum score α = .87). Mirroring the Pediatric Diagnostic version, the instrument has a 2-factor structure, including an Informational Utility subscale (14 items, <span><math><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow></math></span> = .89) and an Emotional Utility subscale (4 items, <span><math><mrow><mi>α</mi></mrow></math></span> = .75). The Informational Utility subscale was strongly associated with empowerment and personal utility of GS. Correlations of the Emotional Utility subscale with psychosocial impact and anxiety and depression were weak to moderate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Initial psychometric testing of the Adult Screening GENEtic Utility scale demonstrates its promise, and additional validation in translational genomics research is warranted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"26 11","pages":"Article 101240"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360024001746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

As population-based screening programs to identify genetic conditions in adults using genomic sequencing (GS) are increasingly available, validated patient-centered outcome measures are needed to understand participants’ experience. We aimed to develop and validate an instrument to assess the perceived utility of GS in the context of adult screening.

Methods

Informed by a 5-domain conceptual model, we used a 5-step approach to instrument development and validation: (1) item writing, (2) cognitive testing, (3) pilot testing and item reduction, (4) psychometric testing, and (5) evaluation of construct validity. Adults undergoing risk-based or population-based GS who had received GS results as part of ongoing research studies participated in structured cognitive interviews and 2 rounds of surveys. After item pool refinement, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis and calculated Pearson correlations with related instruments.

Results

We derived the 18-item Adult Screening version of the GENEtic Utility scale (total sum score α = .87). Mirroring the Pediatric Diagnostic version, the instrument has a 2-factor structure, including an Informational Utility subscale (14 items, α = .89) and an Emotional Utility subscale (4 items, α = .75). The Informational Utility subscale was strongly associated with empowerment and personal utility of GS. Correlations of the Emotional Utility subscale with psychosocial impact and anxiety and depression were weak to moderate.

Conclusion

Initial psychometric testing of the Adult Screening GENEtic Utility scale demonstrates its promise, and additional validation in translational genomics research is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量基因组测序的感知效用:开发并验证用于成人筛查的基因效用(GENE-U)量表。
导言:随着使用基因组测序(GS)识别成人遗传病的人群筛查项目越来越多,需要验证以患者为中心的结果测量来了解参与者的体验。我们旨在开发并验证一种工具,以评估成人筛查中对基因测序的感知效用:在五领域概念模型的指导下,我们采用了五步方法来开发和验证工具:(1)项目编写;(2)认知测试;(3)试点测试和项目缩减;(4)心理测试;(5)构建有效性评估。作为正在进行的研究的一部分,正在接受基于风险或基于人群的 GS 并已收到 GS 结果的成年人参加了结构化认知访谈和两轮调查。在完善项目库后,我们进行了探索性因子分析,并计算了与相关工具的皮尔逊相关性:结果:我们得出了18个项目的成人诊断版基因效用量表(GENE-U)(总分α = .87)。与儿科诊断版本相同,该量表具有双因子结构,包括信息效用子量表(14 个项目,α = 0.89)和情感效用子量表(4 个项目,α = 0.75)。信息效用分量表与 GS 的授权和个人效用密切相关。情感效用子量表与心理社会影响、焦虑和抑郁的相关性为弱至中等:成人筛查 GENE-U 量表的初步心理测试表明了它的前景,有必要在转化基因组学研究中进行进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Pathogenicity assessment of genetic variants identified in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia: novel cases of Familial Chylomicronemia Syndrome from the Dyslipidemia Registry of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society. Genomic sequencing in diverse and underserved pediatric populations: parent perspectives on understanding, uncertainty, psychosocial impact, and personal utility of results. Newborn screening for common genetic variants associated with permanent hearing loss: Implementation in Ontario and a review of the first 3 years. Longitudinal Outcomes in Noonan Syndrome. The impact of genetic counselor involvement in genetic and genomic test order review: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1