Daytime versus nighttime appendectomy in term of complications and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Colorectal Disease Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04705-9
Gang Tang, Jumei Wang, Rui Chen, Jie Zhang, Rongxing Zhou
{"title":"Daytime versus nighttime appendectomy in term of complications and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Gang Tang, Jumei Wang, Rui Chen, Jie Zhang, Rongxing Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s00384-024-04705-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical conditions globally. However, the association between nighttime appendectomy and patients' morbidity and mortality is unclear. This study aims to compare outcomes following nighttime versus daytime appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to March 26, 2024 (updated on July 1, 2024) were searched. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, reoperation, readmission, conversion to laparotomy, hospital stay and operation time. Mean difference (MD) or odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies totaling 33,596 patients were included. There were no differences between nighttime and daytime appendectomy for rates of overall postoperative complications (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87, 1.00, 14 studies), mortality (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.37, 7.88, 7 studies), intraoperative complications (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08, 9.86; 2 studies), reoperation (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.06, 2.55; 3 studies) and readmission (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65, 1.13; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, 5 studies). However, the conversion to laparotomy risks (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12, 3.29; 6 studies) among patients who underwent appendectomy during nighttime was significantly elevated compared to daytime.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no increased risk or difference in postoperative mortality and complication rates associated with nighttime compared with daytime appendectomy. However, future studies should assess the reasons for higher conversion rates during the night.</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"39 1","pages":"131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-024-04705-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical conditions globally. However, the association between nighttime appendectomy and patients' morbidity and mortality is unclear. This study aims to compare outcomes following nighttime versus daytime appendectomy.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to March 26, 2024 (updated on July 1, 2024) were searched. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, reoperation, readmission, conversion to laparotomy, hospital stay and operation time. Mean difference (MD) or odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

Results: Fifteen studies totaling 33,596 patients were included. There were no differences between nighttime and daytime appendectomy for rates of overall postoperative complications (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87, 1.00, 14 studies), mortality (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.37, 7.88, 7 studies), intraoperative complications (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08, 9.86; 2 studies), reoperation (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.06, 2.55; 3 studies) and readmission (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65, 1.13; I2 = 0%, 5 studies). However, the conversion to laparotomy risks (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12, 3.29; 6 studies) among patients who underwent appendectomy during nighttime was significantly elevated compared to daytime.

Conclusions: There was no increased risk or difference in postoperative mortality and complication rates associated with nighttime compared with daytime appendectomy. However, future studies should assess the reasons for higher conversion rates during the night.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日间与夜间阑尾切除术在并发症和临床效果方面的比较:一项荟萃分析。
背景:阑尾炎是全球最常见的急性外科疾病之一:阑尾炎是全球最常见的急性外科疾病之一。然而,夜间阑尾切除术与患者发病率和死亡率之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较夜间与白天阑尾切除术的结果:方法:检索了截至 2024 年 3 月 26 日(2024 年 7 月 1 日更新)的 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 数据库。主要结果为术后并发症和死亡率。次要结果包括术中并发症、再次手术、再次入院、转为开腹手术、住院时间和手术时间。计算了平均差(MD)或几率比(OR)以及 95% 的置信区间:共纳入了 15 项研究,共计 33,596 名患者。在总体术后并发症发生率(OR 0.93,95% CI 0.87,1.00,14 项研究)、死亡率(OR 1.70,95% CI 0.37,7.88,7 项研究)、术中并发症(OR 0.88,95% CI 0.08,9.86;2 项研究)、再次手术(OR 0.39,95% CI 0.06,2.55;3 项研究)和再次入院(OR 0.86,95% CI 0.65,1.13;I2 = 0%,5 项研究)。然而,与白天相比,在夜间接受阑尾切除术的患者转为开腹手术的风险(OR 1.92,95% CI 1.12,3.29;6 项研究)显著升高:结论:与日间阑尾切除术相比,夜间阑尾切除术的术后死亡率和并发症发生率没有增加的风险或差异。结论:夜间阑尾切除术与白天阑尾切除术相比,术后死亡率和并发症发生率没有增加的风险或差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
期刊最新文献
Application of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme in elective colorectal resection for diverticular disease: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. Robotic en bloc resection for transverse colon cancer with a malignant colojejunal fistula: a case report. SENP3 drives colorectal cancer progression by enhancing GDF15 expression. Robot-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer using Weigao versus da Vinci systems: a retrospective comparative study. European Delphi consensus on specific training, implementation requirements, and clinical use for the Hugo™ robotic-assisted surgery platform in colorectal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1