Blood pressure variability as a risk factor of recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

IF 2.2 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Arrhythmia Pub Date : 2024-06-23 DOI:10.1002/joa3.13094
Minoru Yambe MD, PhD, Yuki Kurose MD, Kaoru Hasegawa MD, PhD, Hisashi Kikuta MD, Takenori Sumiyoshi MD, PhD, Yuko Sekiguchi MD, PhD, Takeyoshi Kameyama MD, PhD, Tatsuya Komaru MD, PhD, Koji Kumagai MD, PhD
{"title":"Blood pressure variability as a risk factor of recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation","authors":"Minoru Yambe MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yuki Kurose MD,&nbsp;Kaoru Hasegawa MD, PhD,&nbsp;Hisashi Kikuta MD,&nbsp;Takenori Sumiyoshi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yuko Sekiguchi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Takeyoshi Kameyama MD, PhD,&nbsp;Tatsuya Komaru MD, PhD,&nbsp;Koji Kumagai MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.13094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Blood pressure variability has been found to be a predictor of a stroke, heart failure, and ischemic heart disease that is independent of blood pressure control. This study used the variability independent of the mean (VIM) to evaluate the visit-to-visit blood pressure variability in patients previously undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), and its relationship with AF recurrence was examined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method and Results</h3>\n \n <p>The subjects were 274 consecutive PAF patients who underwent CA at our hospital. Finally, 237 subjects were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up period was 29.6 months, during which 37 subjects had recurrences, and 200 did not. During the outpatient blood pressure examinations, the VIM of the systolic blood pressure (VIM SBP) was significantly higher in the recurrence group, suggesting that blood pressure variability is associated with recurrence. The Cox proportional hazards ratio of the VIM SBP was significantly higher in the recurrence (4.839) than no-recurrence group, even after an adjustment, suggesting that the extent of the variability was a risk factor of recurrence post-CA. In addition, the Cox proportional hazard ratio for recurrence was significantly lower in the patients taking dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, suggesting that the risk of recurrence may differ depending on the type of antihypertensive drug.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Blood pressure variability may be a risk for AF recurrence after CA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"40 4","pages":"858-866"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.13094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Blood pressure variability has been found to be a predictor of a stroke, heart failure, and ischemic heart disease that is independent of blood pressure control. This study used the variability independent of the mean (VIM) to evaluate the visit-to-visit blood pressure variability in patients previously undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), and its relationship with AF recurrence was examined.

Method and Results

The subjects were 274 consecutive PAF patients who underwent CA at our hospital. Finally, 237 subjects were included in the analysis. The mean follow-up period was 29.6 months, during which 37 subjects had recurrences, and 200 did not. During the outpatient blood pressure examinations, the VIM of the systolic blood pressure (VIM SBP) was significantly higher in the recurrence group, suggesting that blood pressure variability is associated with recurrence. The Cox proportional hazards ratio of the VIM SBP was significantly higher in the recurrence (4.839) than no-recurrence group, even after an adjustment, suggesting that the extent of the variability was a risk factor of recurrence post-CA. In addition, the Cox proportional hazard ratio for recurrence was significantly lower in the patients taking dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, suggesting that the risk of recurrence may differ depending on the type of antihypertensive drug.

Conclusions

Blood pressure variability may be a risk for AF recurrence after CA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血压变化是导管消融术后阵发性心房颤动复发的风险因素。
背景:研究发现,血压变异性是中风、心力衰竭和缺血性心脏病的预测因素,与血压控制无关。本研究使用独立于平均值的变异性(VIM)来评估曾接受阵发性心房颤动(PAF)导管消融术(CA)的患者每次就诊时的血压变异性,并研究其与房颤复发的关系:研究对象为在我院接受导管消融术的连续 274 例 PAF 患者。最后,237 名受试者被纳入分析。平均随访时间为 29.6 个月,其中 37 人复发,200 人未复发。在门诊血压检查中,复发组的收缩压VIM(VIM SBP)明显高于复发组,这表明血压变化与复发有关。即使经过调整,复发组 VIM 收缩压的 Cox 比例危险比(4.839)也明显高于未复发组,这表明血压变异的程度是冠状动脉造影术后复发的一个危险因素。此外,服用二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂的患者复发的Cox比例危险比明显降低,这表明不同类型的降压药物可能会导致不同的复发风险:结论:血压变化可能是 CA 后房颤复发的一个风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Dementia risk reduction between DOACs and VKAs in AF: A systematic review and meta-analysis Electro-anatomically confirmed sites of origin of ventricular tachycardia and premature ventricular contractions and occurrence of R wave in lead aVR: A proof of concept study The Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry (J-AB): Annual report in 2022 Slow left atrial conduction velocity in the anterior wall calculated by electroanatomic mapping predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation—Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1