Effectiveness of biofeedback on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Human Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1038/s41371-024-00937-y
Sian Jenkins, Ainslea Cross, Hanad Osman, Farah Salim, Dan Lane, Dennis Bernieh, Kamlesh Khunti, Pankaj Gupta
{"title":"Effectiveness of biofeedback on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Sian Jenkins, Ainslea Cross, Hanad Osman, Farah Salim, Dan Lane, Dennis Bernieh, Kamlesh Khunti, Pankaj Gupta","doi":"10.1038/s41371-024-00937-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but less than 50% have their blood pressure controlled. A possible avenue to support hypertension management is a holistic approach, using non-pharmacological interventions. Since hypertension is mediated in part by dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), biofeedback may help improve hypertension management by targeted self-regulation and self-awareness of parameters that regulate the ANS. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of biofeedback on blood pressure in hypertensive patients. The review was pre-registered on PROSPERO and followed the PICO strategy. A total of 1782 articles were retrieved, 20 met the inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 15 to 301 participants; with a median age of 49.3 (43.3–55.0) years and 45% were female. There was a significant effect of biofeedback on systolic (−4.52, Z = 2.31, P = 0.02, CI [−8.35, −0.69]) and diastolic blood pressure (−5.19, Z = 3.54, P = 0.0004, CI [−8.07, −2.32]). Six different biofeedback modalities were used, with biofeedback delivered by psychologists, trained therapists and research assistants. There was no publication bias, heterogeneity was rated as substantial and data quality was rated to be poor. This review demonstrated that biofeedback had a significant effect on blood pressure. However, this should be viewed in the context of included studies being limited by heterogeneity and dated literature, meaning the research does not reflect the current biofeedback technology such as wearable devices. Future research should incorporate these technologies with robust methodology to fully understand the effect of biofeedback on hypertension.","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-024-00937-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-024-00937-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but less than 50% have their blood pressure controlled. A possible avenue to support hypertension management is a holistic approach, using non-pharmacological interventions. Since hypertension is mediated in part by dysregulation of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), biofeedback may help improve hypertension management by targeted self-regulation and self-awareness of parameters that regulate the ANS. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of biofeedback on blood pressure in hypertensive patients. The review was pre-registered on PROSPERO and followed the PICO strategy. A total of 1782 articles were retrieved, 20 met the inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 15 to 301 participants; with a median age of 49.3 (43.3–55.0) years and 45% were female. There was a significant effect of biofeedback on systolic (−4.52, Z = 2.31, P = 0.02, CI [−8.35, −0.69]) and diastolic blood pressure (−5.19, Z = 3.54, P = 0.0004, CI [−8.07, −2.32]). Six different biofeedback modalities were used, with biofeedback delivered by psychologists, trained therapists and research assistants. There was no publication bias, heterogeneity was rated as substantial and data quality was rated to be poor. This review demonstrated that biofeedback had a significant effect on blood pressure. However, this should be viewed in the context of included studies being limited by heterogeneity and dated literature, meaning the research does not reflect the current biofeedback technology such as wearable devices. Future research should incorporate these technologies with robust methodology to fully understand the effect of biofeedback on hypertension.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物反馈对高血压患者血压的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
高血压是心血管疾病的主要可改变风险因素,但只有不到 50%的人血压得到控制。支持高血压管理的一个可能途径是采用非药物干预的整体方法。由于高血压部分是由自律神经系统(ANS)调节失调引起的,因此生物反馈可通过有针对性的自我调节和对自律神经系统调节参数的自我意识,帮助改善高血压管理。本系统综述旨在评估生物反馈对高血压患者血压的影响。该综述在 PROSPERO 上进行了预注册,并遵循 PICO 策略。共检索到 1782 篇文章,其中 20 篇符合纳入标准。样本量从 15 到 301 人不等,中位年龄为 49.3(43.3-55.0)岁,45% 为女性。生物反馈对收缩压(-4.52,Z = 2.31,P = 0.02,CI [-8.35,-0.69])和舒张压(-5.19,Z = 3.54,P = 0.0004,CI [-8.07,-2.32])有明显影响。使用了六种不同的生物反馈模式,由心理学家、训练有素的治疗师和研究助理提供生物反馈。没有发表偏倚,异质性被评为严重,数据质量被评为较差。该综述表明,生物反馈疗法对血压有显著效果。然而,这应结合所纳入的研究受到异质性和文献年代久远的限制,这意味着研究没有反映出当前的生物反馈技术,如可穿戴设备。未来的研究应结合这些技术和可靠的方法,以充分了解生物反馈对高血压的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Hypertension
Journal of Human Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension. The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.
期刊最新文献
Association of tricarboxylic acid cycle related-metabolites with hypertension in older adults: a community-based cross-sectional study. Sleep quality and hypertension in an indigenous African population: a cross-sectional investigation from the COMBAT-CVDs study. Course of brain damage following malignant hypertension. Blood indices of inflammation and their association with hypertension in smokers: analysis using data mining approaches. JHH Young Investigator Award 2023: interview with the winner Andrew O. Agbaje
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1