Development of a risk score for predicting one-year mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation using XGBoost-assisted feature selection.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Kardiologia polska Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.33963/v.phj.101842
Bin Wang, Feifei Jin, Han Cao, Qing Li, Ping Zhang
{"title":"Development of a risk score for predicting one-year mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation using XGBoost-assisted feature selection.","authors":"Bin Wang, Feifei Jin, Han Cao, Qing Li, Ping Zhang","doi":"10.33963/v.phj.101842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are no tools specifically designed to assess mortality risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to utilize machine learning methods to identify pertinent variables and develop an easily applicable prognostic score to predict 1-year mortality in AF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study, based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database, focused on patients aged 18 years and older with AF. A critical care database from China was the external validation set. The importance of variables from XGBoost guided the development of a logistic model, forming the basis for an AF scoring model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Records of of 26 365 AF patients were obtained from the MIMIC-IV database. The external validation dataset included 231 AF patients. The CRAMB score (Charlson comorbidity index, readmission, age, metastatic solid tumor, and maximum blood urea nitrogen concentration) outperformed the CCI and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, demonstrating superior predictive value for 1-year mortality. In the test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) for the CRAMB score was 0.765 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.753-0.776), while in the external validation set, it was 0.582 (95% CI, 0.502-0.657).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The simplicity of the CRAMB score makes it user-friendly, allowing for coverage of a broader and more heterogeneous AF population.</p>","PeriodicalId":17784,"journal":{"name":"Kardiologia polska","volume":" ","pages":"941-948"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kardiologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33963/v.phj.101842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no tools specifically designed to assess mortality risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Aims: This study aimed to utilize machine learning methods to identify pertinent variables and develop an easily applicable prognostic score to predict 1-year mortality in AF patients.

Methods: This study, based on the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) database, focused on patients aged 18 years and older with AF. A critical care database from China was the external validation set. The importance of variables from XGBoost guided the development of a logistic model, forming the basis for an AF scoring model.

Results: Records of of 26 365 AF patients were obtained from the MIMIC-IV database. The external validation dataset included 231 AF patients. The CRAMB score (Charlson comorbidity index, readmission, age, metastatic solid tumor, and maximum blood urea nitrogen concentration) outperformed the CCI and CHA2DS2-VASc scores, demonstrating superior predictive value for 1-year mortality. In the test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) for the CRAMB score was 0.765 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.753-0.776), while in the external validation set, it was 0.582 (95% CI, 0.502-0.657).

Conclusions: The simplicity of the CRAMB score makes it user-friendly, allowing for coverage of a broader and more heterogeneous AF population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用 XGBoost 辅助特征选择技术开发预测心房颤动患者一年死亡率的风险评分。
背景:目前还没有专门用于评估房颤患者死亡风险的工具:目的:本研究旨在利用机器学习方法确定相关变量,并开发一种易于应用的预后评分,以预测房颤患者的 1 年死亡率:本研究以重症监护医学信息市场-IV(MIMIC-IV)数据库为基础,重点关注年龄在18岁及以上的房颤患者。中国的重症监护数据库是外部验证集。XGBoost变量的重要性指导了逻辑模型的建立,为房颤评分模型奠定了基础:从 MIMIC-IV 数据库中获得了 26 365 名房颤患者的记录。外部验证数据集包括 231 名房颤患者。CRAMB评分(Charlson合并症指数、再入院、年龄、转移性实体瘤和最大血尿素氮浓度)优于CCI和CHA2DS2-VASc评分,对1年死亡率的预测价值更高。在测试集中,CRAMB 评分的接收器操作特征下面积(AUC)为 0.765(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.753-0.776),而在外部验证集中,该值为 0.582(95% CI,0.502-0.657):CRAMB评分简单易用,可覆盖更广泛、更多类型的房颤人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Kardiologia polska
Kardiologia polska 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
24.20%
发文量
431
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Kardiologia Polska (Kardiol Pol, Polish Heart Journal) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Polish Cardiac Society (PTK, Polskie Towarzystwo Kardiologiczne) published monthly since 1957. It aims to provide a platform for sharing knowledge in cardiology, from basic science to translational and clinical research on cardiovascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
Cardiac or oncologic first? Navigating treatment sequencing in carcinoid heart disease. How to link recurrent nosebleeds and ischemic stroke: All you need is multimodal and multidisciplinary approach to detect and treat arteriovenous malformations. Comparative assessment of stress-related disorders and arterial hypertension burden in Ukrainian refugee women and women staying in Ukraine during the war. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is not associated with the elevated risk of atrial fibrillation: Evidence from the UK biobank cohort study. Minimally invasive Wheat procedure via right axillary approach with 3d-endoscopic support: First Polish experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1