Comparative Study of Degree of Great Toe Movement after Complete and Partial Flexor Hallucis Longus Harvest in Free Fibula Flap.

Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1786989
Ishan Agnihotri, Bibhuti Bhusan Nayak, Puja Lakhotia, Aashish Patnaik, Rasmi Ranjan Mohanty
{"title":"Comparative Study of Degree of Great Toe Movement after Complete and Partial Flexor Hallucis Longus Harvest in Free Fibula Flap.","authors":"Ishan Agnihotri, Bibhuti Bhusan Nayak, Puja Lakhotia, Aashish Patnaik, Rasmi Ranjan Mohanty","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1786989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle is crucial in fine motor control of the great toe but the muscle is often sacrificed in free fibula flap (FFF) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare great toe movement between complete and partial FHL resection during FFF harvest to see if FHL can be left behind (without undergoing fibrosis) in situ when bulk is not required at the recipient site. <b>Methods</b>  A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was performed including patients undergoing FFF harvest over a 2-year period. Movement of great toe interphalangeal joint was recorded of operated and unoperated legs in patients undergoing partial and complete FHL harvest and data analyzed. <b>Results</b>  There was a statistically significant ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05) difference between the two groups of patients. <b>Conclusion</b>  FHL can be safely left in situ in patients not requiring bulk at the recipient site as blood supply, nerve supply, and muscle function are not compromised in partial FHL harvest. Further image-based and dye-based studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  The flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscle is crucial in fine motor control of the great toe but the muscle is often sacrificed in free fibula flap (FFF) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to compare great toe movement between complete and partial FHL resection during FFF harvest to see if FHL can be left behind (without undergoing fibrosis) in situ when bulk is not required at the recipient site. Methods  A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was performed including patients undergoing FFF harvest over a 2-year period. Movement of great toe interphalangeal joint was recorded of operated and unoperated legs in patients undergoing partial and complete FHL harvest and data analyzed. Results  There was a statistically significant ( p  < 0.05) difference between the two groups of patients. Conclusion  FHL can be safely left in situ in patients not requiring bulk at the recipient site as blood supply, nerve supply, and muscle function are not compromised in partial FHL harvest. Further image-based and dye-based studies are warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
游离腓骨瓣完全和部分切除屈拇肌后大脚趾活动度的比较研究
背景 屈拇长肌(FHL)对大拇趾的精细运动控制至关重要,但在游离腓骨瓣(FFF)重建中往往会牺牲这块肌肉。本研究的目的是比较游离腓骨皮瓣采集过程中完全切除和部分切除拇长屈肌后大拇趾的运动情况,以了解当受体部位不需要大块肌肉时,能否在原位保留拇长屈肌(不发生纤维化)。方法 进行了一项前瞻性横断面观察研究,研究对象包括两年内接受 FFF 切除术的患者。记录了部分和完全切除 FHL 的患者手术腿和未手术腿的大拇趾指间关节活动情况,并对数据进行了分析。结果 在部分切除 FHL 的患者中,由于血液供应、神经供应和肌肉功能不会受到影响,因此在不需要在受体部位进行大块切除的患者中,FHL 可以安全地留在原位。有必要进一步开展基于图像和染料的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1