Differentiating hand gestures from forearm muscle activity using machine learning.

Ryan Cho, Sunil Puli, Jaejin Hwang
{"title":"Differentiating hand gestures from forearm muscle activity using machine learning.","authors":"Ryan Cho, Sunil Puli, Jaejin Hwang","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2383021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored the use of forearm electromyography data to distinguish eight hand gestures. The neural network (NN) and random forest (RF) algorithms were tested on data from 10 participants. As window sizes increase from 200 ms to 1000 ms, the algorithm accuracies increased with RF from 85% to 97% due to the increased temporal resolution. It was also noticed that the RF performed better with an accuracy of 85% than the NN with accuracy 80% when the temporal resolution was smaller, indicating the RF will be efficient when quick-response time is important. As the window size increases, the NN showed higher performance, suggesting that NN will be useful when higher accuracy is required. Future studies should increase the sample size, include more hand gestures, use different feature extraction methods and test different algorithms to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the system.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2383021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the use of forearm electromyography data to distinguish eight hand gestures. The neural network (NN) and random forest (RF) algorithms were tested on data from 10 participants. As window sizes increase from 200 ms to 1000 ms, the algorithm accuracies increased with RF from 85% to 97% due to the increased temporal resolution. It was also noticed that the RF performed better with an accuracy of 85% than the NN with accuracy 80% when the temporal resolution was smaller, indicating the RF will be efficient when quick-response time is important. As the window size increases, the NN showed higher performance, suggesting that NN will be useful when higher accuracy is required. Future studies should increase the sample size, include more hand gestures, use different feature extraction methods and test different algorithms to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习从前臂肌肉活动区分手势
本研究探索了利用前臂肌电图数据区分八种手势的方法。在 10 名参与者的数据上测试了神经网络(NN)和随机森林(RF)算法。随着窗口大小从 200 毫秒增加到 1000 毫秒,由于时间分辨率的提高,RF 算法的准确率从 85% 提高到 97%。我们还注意到,当时间分辨率较小时,RF 算法的准确率为 85%,而 NN 算法的准确率为 80%,这表明当快速反应时间很重要时,RF 算法会更有效。随着窗口大小的增加,NN 的性能更高,这表明当需要更高的准确度时,NN 将非常有用。未来的研究应增加样本量,包括更多的手势,使用不同的特征提取方法和测试不同的算法,以提高系统的准确性和效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Prediction of human error probability in helicopter to ship transfer operation under an evidential reasoning extended CREAM approach. Comparison of postural assessment and awareness in individuals receiving posture training using the digital AI posture assessment and correction system. Neuro-fuzzy prediction model of occupational injuries in mining. The impact of digital leadership on safety performance - a moderated mediation model. Air rage from the sharp end: cabin crew perspectives on disruptive passenger behaviour in Europe and its impact on occupational safety and well-being
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1