Enablers and barriers to engaging under-served groups in research: Survey of the United Kingdom research professional's views.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2023-12-18 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13434.2
Dorothy Coe, Theophile Bigirumurame, Meera Burgess, John Rouse, Caroline Wroe
{"title":"Enablers and barriers to engaging under-served groups in research: Survey of the United Kingdom research professional's views.","authors":"Dorothy Coe, Theophile Bigirumurame, Meera Burgess, John Rouse, Caroline Wroe","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13434.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a known lack of diversity in research participant populations. This impacts on the generalisability of findings and affects clinician prescribing. In the United Kingdom the research community defines those who are underrepresented as under-served. They are commonly those affected by health inequality and disparity. The notion of under-served is complex, with numerous papers identifying multiple factors that contribute to being under-served and in turn suggesting many strategies to improve engagement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Research professionals in the UK were invited to complete an online survey. The broad aim was to explore their views on under-served groups. The findings were analysed using statistical and qualitative methods to identify enablers and barriers to engaging the under-served. Descriptive statistics were utilised with associations compared univariately by chi-square test and logistic regression for multivariable analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 945 completed responses were received. Those identified as under-served in this study reflected the previous body of works with a broader descriptor of ethnic and cultural minorities and the addition of adolescents and young adults. Language and literacy skills had the most impact on being under-served. Only 13% of respondents said they felt equipped to meet the needs of the under-served. The main strategy to increase diversity was community engagement and movement of research delivery into the community. The barriers were funding and time. Training needs identified were linked to community engagement, cultural competence and consent processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The UK findings from research professionals reflected the previous literature. Adolescents and young people were added to those identified as under-served. Enablers included community outreach and improvement to communication. Barriers were time, funding, organisational processes and lack of focus. Issues were identified with translation and interpretation services. Training requirements focus on methodologies and methods to engage and the consent processes of those from under-served groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"3 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13434.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a known lack of diversity in research participant populations. This impacts on the generalisability of findings and affects clinician prescribing. In the United Kingdom the research community defines those who are underrepresented as under-served. They are commonly those affected by health inequality and disparity. The notion of under-served is complex, with numerous papers identifying multiple factors that contribute to being under-served and in turn suggesting many strategies to improve engagement.

Methods: Research professionals in the UK were invited to complete an online survey. The broad aim was to explore their views on under-served groups. The findings were analysed using statistical and qualitative methods to identify enablers and barriers to engaging the under-served. Descriptive statistics were utilised with associations compared univariately by chi-square test and logistic regression for multivariable analysis.

Results: A total of 945 completed responses were received. Those identified as under-served in this study reflected the previous body of works with a broader descriptor of ethnic and cultural minorities and the addition of adolescents and young adults. Language and literacy skills had the most impact on being under-served. Only 13% of respondents said they felt equipped to meet the needs of the under-served. The main strategy to increase diversity was community engagement and movement of research delivery into the community. The barriers were funding and time. Training needs identified were linked to community engagement, cultural competence and consent processes.

Conclusions: The UK findings from research professionals reflected the previous literature. Adolescents and young people were added to those identified as under-served. Enablers included community outreach and improvement to communication. Barriers were time, funding, organisational processes and lack of focus. Issues were identified with translation and interpretation services. Training requirements focus on methodologies and methods to engage and the consent processes of those from under-served groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让服务不足群体参与研究的促进因素和障碍:英国研究专业人员观点调查。
背景:众所周知,研究参与者群体缺乏多样性。这影响了研究结果的普遍性,也影响了临床医生的处方。在英国,研究界将代表性不足的人群定义为服务不足人群。他们通常是受到健康不平等和差异影响的人群。服务不足的概念非常复杂,许多论文都指出了导致服务不足的多种因素,并反过来提出了许多提高参与度的策略:方法:邀请英国的研究专业人员完成一项在线调查。调查的主要目的是了解他们对服务不足群体的看法。我们使用统计和定性方法对调查结果进行了分析,以确定促进服务不足群体参与的因素和障碍。使用了描述性统计方法,并通过卡方检验和逻辑回归进行单变量比较,以进行多变量分析:结果:共收到 945 份完整答复。本研究中被确定为服务不足的人群反映了以往的研究成果,对少数民族和文化少数群体的描述更为宽泛,并增加了青少年和年轻成年人。语言和读写能力对服务不足的影响最大。只有 13% 的受访者表示,他们认为自己有能力满足服务不足者的需求。增加多样性的主要策略是社区参与和将研究成果转移到社区。障碍在于资金和时间。已确定的培训需求与社区参与、文化能力和同意程序有关:英国研究专业人员的研究结果反映了之前的文献。青少年被认为是服务不足的群体。促进因素包括社区外联和改善沟通。障碍包括时间、资金、组织流程和缺乏重点。笔译和口译服务也存在问题。培训要求侧重于参与的方法和方式,以及服务不足群体的同意程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review. Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection. Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol. Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study. The UK Breast Cancer in Pregnancy (UKBCiP) Study. Incidence, diagnosis, management and short-term outcomes of breast cancer first diagnosed during pregnancy in the United Kingdom: A population-based descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1