EVALUATION OF QUALITY INDICATORS OF SCREENING COLONOSCOPY PERFORMED IN A PRIVATE QUARTERNARY HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL.

Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Luiza Martins Baroni, Alexandre Moraes Bestetti, Mateus Pereira Funari, Rodrigo Silva de Padua Rocha, Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos, Saullo Queiroz Silveira, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
{"title":"EVALUATION OF QUALITY INDICATORS OF SCREENING COLONOSCOPY PERFORMED IN A PRIVATE QUARTERNARY HOSPITAL IN BRAZIL.","authors":"Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura, Luiza Martins Baroni, Alexandre Moraes Bestetti, Mateus Pereira Funari, Rodrigo Silva de Padua Rocha, Marcos Eduardo Lera Dos Santos, Saullo Queiroz Silveira, Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura","doi":"10.1590/0102-6720202400022e1815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in Brazil, despite the availability of screening methods that reduce its risk. Colonoscopy is the only screening method that also allows therapeutic procedures. The proper screening through colonoscopy is linked to the quality of the exam, which can be evaluated according to quality criteria recommended by various institutions. Among the factors, the most used is the Adenoma Detection Rate, which should be at least 25% for general population.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the quality of the screening colonoscopies performed in a quarternary private Brazilian hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study evaluating the quality indicators of colonoscopies performed at a private center since its inauguration. Only asymptomatic patients aged over 45 years who underwent screening colonoscopy were included. The primary outcome was the Adenoma Detection Rate, and secondary outcomes included polyps detection rate and safety profile. Subanalyses evaluated the correlation of endoscopic findings with gender and age and the evolution of detection rates over the years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,144 patients were include with a mean age of 60.54 years-old. Polyps were diagnosed in 68.6% of the procedures. Adenoma detection rate was 46.8%, with an increasing rate over the years, mainly in males. A low rate of adverse events was reported in 0.23% of the cases, with no need for surgical intervention and no deaths.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that high quality screening colonoscopy is possible when performed by experienced endoscopists and trained nurses, under an adequate infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":72298,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","volume":"37 ","pages":"e1815"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11318960/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720202400022e1815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer in Brazil, despite the availability of screening methods that reduce its risk. Colonoscopy is the only screening method that also allows therapeutic procedures. The proper screening through colonoscopy is linked to the quality of the exam, which can be evaluated according to quality criteria recommended by various institutions. Among the factors, the most used is the Adenoma Detection Rate, which should be at least 25% for general population.

Aims: To evaluate the quality of the screening colonoscopies performed in a quarternary private Brazilian hospital.

Methods: This is a retrospective study evaluating the quality indicators of colonoscopies performed at a private center since its inauguration. Only asymptomatic patients aged over 45 years who underwent screening colonoscopy were included. The primary outcome was the Adenoma Detection Rate, and secondary outcomes included polyps detection rate and safety profile. Subanalyses evaluated the correlation of endoscopic findings with gender and age and the evolution of detection rates over the years.

Results: A total of 2,144 patients were include with a mean age of 60.54 years-old. Polyps were diagnosed in 68.6% of the procedures. Adenoma detection rate was 46.8%, with an increasing rate over the years, mainly in males. A low rate of adverse events was reported in 0.23% of the cases, with no need for surgical intervention and no deaths.

Conclusions: This study shows that high quality screening colonoscopy is possible when performed by experienced endoscopists and trained nurses, under an adequate infrastructure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估巴西一家私立四级医院进行的结肠镜筛查的质量指标。
背景介绍在巴西,结肠直肠癌是第三大常见癌症类型,尽管有一些筛查方法可以降低患癌风险。结肠镜检查是唯一一种可以进行治疗的筛查方法。通过结肠镜进行适当筛查与检查质量有关,可根据不同机构推荐的质量标准进行评估。在这些因素中,最常用的是腺瘤检出率,一般人群的腺瘤检出率至少应为 25%。目的:评估巴西一家四等私立医院进行的结肠镜筛查的质量:这是一项回顾性研究,评估一家私立中心自成立以来所做结肠镜检查的质量指标。研究对象仅包括 45 岁以上接受结肠镜筛查的无症状患者。主要结果是腺瘤检出率,次要结果包括息肉检出率和安全性。子分析评估了内窥镜检查结果与性别和年龄的相关性,以及多年来检出率的变化情况:共纳入 2,144 名患者,平均年龄为 60.54 岁。68.6%的手术诊断出息肉。腺瘤检出率为 46.8%,随着时间的推移,检出率不断上升,主要是男性。不良反应发生率较低,仅为 0.23%,无需手术干预,无死亡病例:这项研究表明,由经验丰富的内镜医师和训练有素的护士在适当的基础设施条件下进行高质量的结肠镜筛查是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHROMOPHOBE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGES. COMPLICATIONS AFTER HEPATECTOMY. EARLY REFEEDING AFTER COLORECTAL CANCER SURGERY REDUCES COMPLICATIONS AND LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY. MANAGEMENT OF SYNCHRONIC LARGE LIVER METASTASIS IN A NON-OCCLUSIVE COLON TUMOR. HETEROTOPIC GASTRIC MUCOSA OF THE ESOPHAGUS AS A POTENTIAL CAUSE OF PEPTIC STENOSIS AFTER ROUX-EN-Y GASTRIC BYPASS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1