Qualitative study of experience of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT+) amongst Survivors' Rehabilitation Evaluation after Cancer (SURECAN) trial participants and therapists: A protocol.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2024-01-03 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13382.2
Sheila Donovan, Trudie Chalder, Dipesh Gopal, Imran Khan, Ania Korszun, Elisavet Moschopoulou, Damien Ridge, Clare Robinson, Stephanie Taylor
{"title":"Qualitative study of experience of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT+) amongst Survivors' Rehabilitation Evaluation after Cancer (SURECAN) trial participants and therapists: A protocol.","authors":"Sheila Donovan, Trudie Chalder, Dipesh Gopal, Imran Khan, Ania Korszun, Elisavet Moschopoulou, Damien Ridge, Clare Robinson, Stephanie Taylor","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13382.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This interview study forms part of a mixed methods process evaluation of the Survivors' Rehabilitation Evaluation after Cancer (SURECAN) trial to understand the experiences of participants (who are living with and beyond cancer) in receiving a form of acceptance and commitment therapy, and therapists providing the intervention. SURECAN is a multi-centre, pragmatic, individual participant randomised controlled trial of an intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy supplemented by support for return to meaningful work and/or physical activity (ACT+). This qualitative study addresses the ways in which participants believe they benefit from ACT+ (or not), and how the ACT+ intervention might best be implemented into routine National Health Service (NHS) care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study investigates experiences of ACT+ by different participants to understand how we can optimise the ACT+ intervention and its delivery (assuming the intervention is successful). We will conduct individual interviews with participants who have taken part in the active arm of the SURECAN trial to understand their experiences of engaging with and receiving ACT+, their perceptions of the impact of the therapy, and relevant contextual factors influencing these experiences. In particular, we will focus on comparing our interview findings between those trial participants who improved and those who failed to improve (or worsened), in terms of quality of life following ACT+. Additionally, we will conduct individual interviews with therapists who have delivered ACT+ as part of the SURECAN trial, to understand their experiences of delivering ACT+.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with other qualitative protocols, this protocol is not registered. Instead, it is shared as a means of documenting ahead of time, how we are endeavouring to understand the ways in which a newly trialled talking therapy is received by patients and therapists, and how (if successful) it might be incorporated into the NHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"3 ","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11319895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13382.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This interview study forms part of a mixed methods process evaluation of the Survivors' Rehabilitation Evaluation after Cancer (SURECAN) trial to understand the experiences of participants (who are living with and beyond cancer) in receiving a form of acceptance and commitment therapy, and therapists providing the intervention. SURECAN is a multi-centre, pragmatic, individual participant randomised controlled trial of an intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy supplemented by support for return to meaningful work and/or physical activity (ACT+). This qualitative study addresses the ways in which participants believe they benefit from ACT+ (or not), and how the ACT+ intervention might best be implemented into routine National Health Service (NHS) care.

Methods: The study investigates experiences of ACT+ by different participants to understand how we can optimise the ACT+ intervention and its delivery (assuming the intervention is successful). We will conduct individual interviews with participants who have taken part in the active arm of the SURECAN trial to understand their experiences of engaging with and receiving ACT+, their perceptions of the impact of the therapy, and relevant contextual factors influencing these experiences. In particular, we will focus on comparing our interview findings between those trial participants who improved and those who failed to improve (or worsened), in terms of quality of life following ACT+. Additionally, we will conduct individual interviews with therapists who have delivered ACT+ as part of the SURECAN trial, to understand their experiences of delivering ACT+.

Conclusions: Consistent with other qualitative protocols, this protocol is not registered. Instead, it is shared as a means of documenting ahead of time, how we are endeavouring to understand the ways in which a newly trialled talking therapy is received by patients and therapists, and how (if successful) it might be incorporated into the NHS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症幸存者康复评估(SURECAN)试验参与者和治疗师对接纳与承诺疗法(ACT+)体验的定性研究:协议。
背景:这项访谈研究是对癌症幸存者康复评估(SURECAN)试验进行混合方法过程评估的一部分,目的是了解参与者(癌症患者和癌症康复者)在接受某种形式的接纳与承诺疗法时的经历,以及提供干预的治疗师的经历。SURECAN 是一项多中心、务实的个人参与者随机对照试验,其干预措施以接纳与承诺疗法为基础,辅以支持重返有意义的工作和/或体育活动(ACT+)。这项定性研究探讨了参与者认为他们从 ACT+ 中受益(或不受益)的方式,以及如何将 ACT+ 干预措施最好地应用到国民健康服务(NHS)的常规护理中:本研究调查不同参与者对 ACT+ 的体验,以了解我们如何优化 ACT+ 干预及其实施(假设干预成功)。我们将对参加 SURECAN 试验积极组的参与者进行个别访谈,以了解他们参与和接受 ACT+ 的经历、他们对疗法影响的看法以及影响这些经历的相关背景因素。特别是,我们将重点比较那些在 ACT+ 治疗后生活质量有所改善和没有改善(或恶化)的试验参与者之间的访谈结果。此外,我们还将对在 SURECAN 试验中提供 ACT+ 的治疗师进行个别访谈,以了解他们提供 ACT+ 的经验:与其他定性方案一致,本方案未注册。与其他定性协议一样,本协议并未注册,而是作为一种提前记录的手段与大家分享,我们正在努力了解患者和治疗师是如何接受新试用的谈话疗法的,以及(如果成功的话)如何将其纳入国家医疗服务体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
improving Pain mAnagement for childreN and young people attendeD by Ambulance (PANDA): protocol for a realist review. Mapping decision-making pathways: Determination of intervention entry points for diagnostic tests in suspected serious infection. Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol. Pulmonary aspiration during pregnancy or immediately postpartum in the UK: A population-based case-control study. The UK Breast Cancer in Pregnancy (UKBCiP) Study. Incidence, diagnosis, management and short-term outcomes of breast cancer first diagnosed during pregnancy in the United Kingdom: A population-based descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1