Are Medical Students and Primary Health-care Professionals Aware of Neonatal Cholestasis and Acholic Stool.

IF 1.3 Q3 PEDIATRICS Turkish archives of pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23316
Neslihan Gürcan Kaya, Sinan Sarı, Buket Dalgıç
{"title":"Are Medical Students and Primary Health-care Professionals Aware of Neonatal Cholestasis and Acholic Stool.","authors":"Neslihan Gürcan Kaya, Sinan Sarı, Buket Dalgıç","doi":"10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA) and the timing of Kasai hepatic portoenterostomy are associated with improved survival rates of the native liver. Acholic stool is a major and earliest sign of BA. We evaluated the awareness and recognition of medical students and primary health care professionals (PHCPs) about neonatal cholestasis and acholic stool as a marker of BA. The knowledge of students and PHCP about prolonged jaundice and acholic stool was evaluated through a questionnaire. In the first step, 5 questions evaluating the knowledge of prolonged jaundice were asked. The sixth question was \"Have you ever seen acholic stool before?\" Following this question, stool color cards with 9 colors were shown, and participants were asked \"Which of the following stool pictures would you define as acholic?\" A total 724 students and 88 PHCPs were included in the study. In both groups, about half of the participants could not answer the first 4questions related to prolonged jaundice and cholestasis correctly. Twenty-four percent of the students and 11.4% of PHCP answered correctly to all of the stool colors. The rate of correct answers to acholic stool colors were approximately 43.9%-87.6% and 23.9%-86.4% for students and PHCP, respectively. Whitish acholic stool colors were better known than mild yellowish pale stool colors. The percentages of recognition were less than about 50% for these stool colors. This study showed that recognition and awareness of prolonged jaundice are low, and acholic stool is not well known. This may lead to delay in diagnosis. Considering the international success of stool color cards, using stool color cards will improve the outcomes of biliary atresia in our country as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":75267,"journal":{"name":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11181215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish archives of pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2024.23316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA) and the timing of Kasai hepatic portoenterostomy are associated with improved survival rates of the native liver. Acholic stool is a major and earliest sign of BA. We evaluated the awareness and recognition of medical students and primary health care professionals (PHCPs) about neonatal cholestasis and acholic stool as a marker of BA. The knowledge of students and PHCP about prolonged jaundice and acholic stool was evaluated through a questionnaire. In the first step, 5 questions evaluating the knowledge of prolonged jaundice were asked. The sixth question was "Have you ever seen acholic stool before?" Following this question, stool color cards with 9 colors were shown, and participants were asked "Which of the following stool pictures would you define as acholic?" A total 724 students and 88 PHCPs were included in the study. In both groups, about half of the participants could not answer the first 4questions related to prolonged jaundice and cholestasis correctly. Twenty-four percent of the students and 11.4% of PHCP answered correctly to all of the stool colors. The rate of correct answers to acholic stool colors were approximately 43.9%-87.6% and 23.9%-86.4% for students and PHCP, respectively. Whitish acholic stool colors were better known than mild yellowish pale stool colors. The percentages of recognition were less than about 50% for these stool colors. This study showed that recognition and awareness of prolonged jaundice are low, and acholic stool is not well known. This may lead to delay in diagnosis. Considering the international success of stool color cards, using stool color cards will improve the outcomes of biliary atresia in our country as well.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生和初级卫生保健专业人员是否了解新生儿胆汁淤积症和胆汁性粪便。
胆道闭锁(BA)的早期诊断和卡萨伊肝造口术的时机与提高原肝存活率有关。胆汁性粪便是胆道闭锁的主要和最早征兆。我们评估了医科学生和初级卫生保健专业人员(PHCPs)对新生儿胆汁淤积症和胆汁淤积症标志物--胆汁淤积症无胆便的认识和认可度。我们通过问卷调查评估了学生和初级卫生保健人员对黄疸持续时间和无痛性粪便的了解程度。首先,提出了 5 个问题来评估对黄疸持续时间的了解程度。第六个问题是 "您以前见过赭石样大便吗?在这个问题之后,展示了包含 9 种颜色的粪便颜色卡,并询问参与者 "您认为以下哪种粪便图片属于赭石色?共有 724 名学生和 88 名初级保健医生参与了研究。在两组参与者中,约有一半的人无法正确回答与黄疸持续时间和胆汁淤积症有关的前 4 个问题。24%的学生和11.4%的初级保健医生正确回答了所有粪便颜色的问题。学生和初级保健医生对隐痛粪便颜色的正确回答率分别约为 43.9%-87.6% 和 23.9%-86.4% 。偏白的赭色大便比偏黄的淡色大便更好辨认。这些粪便颜色的识别率均低于 50%。这项研究表明,人们对黄疸持续时间较长的识别率和认知度较低,对赭石色大便的认知度也不高。这可能会导致诊断延误。考虑到大便颜色卡在国际上取得的成功,在我国使用大便颜色卡也将改善胆道闭锁的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Alarming Sign of Nebulized Ipratropium Bromide in a Case Series: Anisocoria. Clinical and Prognostic Characteristics in Childhood Osteosarcoma: A Single-Center Experience in Türkiye. Clinical Outcomes of Oral Antibiotic Switch in Children with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Cholestatic Infants with Biliary Atresia. Evaluation of Children with Aortic Coarctation: A Single-Center Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1