Epidemiology of headache presentations to United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.08.013
{"title":"Epidemiology of headache presentations to United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Headaches are a common condition seen in the Emergency Department (ED), with numerous trials focused on improving care for these patients. However, there is limited recent large-scale, robust data available on the incidence, admission rates, evaluation, and treatment in the ED setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a cross-sectional study of ED presentations for headache from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023 using the Epic Cosmos national database. All ED visits with headache-relevant ICD-10 coding were included. Outcomes included percentage of total ED visits, admission rates, computed tomography (CT) brain imaging, lumbar puncture (LP) performance, and medication administration. Medications were analyzed by class (NSAIDs, acetaminophen, dopamine antagonists, diphenhydramine, opioids, intravenous fluids, caffeine, and magnesium sulfate). Subgroup analyses were performed by specific types of dopamine antagonists.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 188,482,644 ED encounters, 6,007,090 (3.2%) were due to headache. Of these, 246,082 (4.1%) were admitted. Nearly half (46.6%) of patients received at least one CT. Rates of CT head without contrast increased from 38.2% to 47.9% over time, while rates of CT angiography rose from 2.8% to 10.2%. 1.4% of all patients received an LP, with rates decreasing from 1.8% to 1.1% over time. The most common medication was NSAIDs (45.3%), followed by dopamine antagonists (44.8%), diphenhydramine (38.1%), acetaminophen (24.8%), opioids (16.3%), magnesium sulfate (0.2%), and caffeine (0.1%). 50.8% of patients received intravenous fluids. Rates of opioids declined over time, while dopamine antagonists, acetaminophen, and intravenous fluid administration increased.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Headaches represent a common reason for ED presentation, with approximately 4% of patients being admitted. Imaging is frequently performed, with rises in CT without contrast and CT angiography rates over time, while LP rates have been declining. NSAIDs remain the most common medication given, with opioids declining over time while non-opioid agents such as dopamine antagonists have increased. These findings can help inform health policy initiatives, such as those focused on radiologic imaging and evidence-based medication administration.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724004005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Headaches are a common condition seen in the Emergency Department (ED), with numerous trials focused on improving care for these patients. However, there is limited recent large-scale, robust data available on the incidence, admission rates, evaluation, and treatment in the ED setting.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study of ED presentations for headache from 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2023 using the Epic Cosmos national database. All ED visits with headache-relevant ICD-10 coding were included. Outcomes included percentage of total ED visits, admission rates, computed tomography (CT) brain imaging, lumbar puncture (LP) performance, and medication administration. Medications were analyzed by class (NSAIDs, acetaminophen, dopamine antagonists, diphenhydramine, opioids, intravenous fluids, caffeine, and magnesium sulfate). Subgroup analyses were performed by specific types of dopamine antagonists.

Results

Of 188,482,644 ED encounters, 6,007,090 (3.2%) were due to headache. Of these, 246,082 (4.1%) were admitted. Nearly half (46.6%) of patients received at least one CT. Rates of CT head without contrast increased from 38.2% to 47.9% over time, while rates of CT angiography rose from 2.8% to 10.2%. 1.4% of all patients received an LP, with rates decreasing from 1.8% to 1.1% over time. The most common medication was NSAIDs (45.3%), followed by dopamine antagonists (44.8%), diphenhydramine (38.1%), acetaminophen (24.8%), opioids (16.3%), magnesium sulfate (0.2%), and caffeine (0.1%). 50.8% of patients received intravenous fluids. Rates of opioids declined over time, while dopamine antagonists, acetaminophen, and intravenous fluid administration increased.

Conclusion

Headaches represent a common reason for ED presentation, with approximately 4% of patients being admitted. Imaging is frequently performed, with rises in CT without contrast and CT angiography rates over time, while LP rates have been declining. NSAIDs remain the most common medication given, with opioids declining over time while non-opioid agents such as dopamine antagonists have increased. These findings can help inform health policy initiatives, such as those focused on radiologic imaging and evidence-based medication administration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2016 年至 2023 年美国急诊科头痛就诊流行病学
简介:头痛是急诊科(ED)的常见病,许多试验都致力于改善对这些患者的护理。然而,近期关于急诊科的发病率、入院率、评估和治疗的大规模可靠数据却很有限。方法这是一项横断面研究,使用 Epic Cosmos 国家数据库对 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 12 月 31 日的急诊科头痛就诊情况进行研究。研究纳入了所有与头痛相关的 ICD-10 编码急诊就诊。结果包括急诊室就诊总人数的百分比、入院率、计算机断层扫描(CT)脑成像、腰椎穿刺(LP)结果和用药情况。药物按类别(非甾体抗炎药、对乙酰氨基酚、多巴胺拮抗剂、苯海拉明、阿片类药物、静脉注射液、咖啡因和硫酸镁)进行分析。结果 在188,482,644次急诊就诊中,有6,007,090次(3.2%)因头痛就诊。其中 246,082 人(4.1%)入院治疗。近一半(46.6%)的患者至少接受了一次 CT 检查。无对比剂头部 CT 的比例从 38.2% 增加到 47.9%,而血管造影 CT 的比例从 2.8% 增加到 10.2%。所有患者中有 1.4% 接受了 LP 检查,随着时间的推移,这一比例从 1.8% 降至 1.1%。最常见的药物是非甾体抗炎药(45.3%),其次是多巴胺拮抗剂(44.8%)、苯海拉明(38.1%)、对乙酰氨基酚(24.8%)、阿片类药物(16.3%)、硫酸镁(0.2%)和咖啡因(0.1%)。50.8%的患者接受了静脉输液。随着时间的推移,阿片类药物的使用率有所下降,而多巴胺拮抗剂、对乙酰氨基酚和静脉输液的使用率则有所上升。影像学检查很常见,无对比剂 CT 和 CT 血管造影检查的比例随时间推移有所上升,而 LP 检查的比例却在下降。非甾体抗炎药仍然是最常用的药物,阿片类药物随时间推移有所减少,而多巴胺拮抗剂等非阿片类药物则有所增加。这些研究结果有助于为卫生政策措施提供信息,例如以放射成像和循证用药为重点的政策措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Gabapentinoid prescribing patterns and predictors utilizing neural networks:Comment. Why is oral diltiazem protocol more effective than intravenous protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department? Epidemiology of heart failure presentations to United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023. Characterizing emergency department surgical airway placement in the setting of trauma - A reply with a data-in-brief analysis of the pediatric cricothyrotomy. An update of the severe trauma scoring system using the Korean National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1