Comparison of dairy manure versus compost effects on short-term nitrogen mineralization and microbial biomass in organic annual forage production system

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1002/agg2.20555
Tunsisa T. Hurisso, Jessica G. Davis, Frank H. Stonaker, Daniel A. Goldhamer, Joe E. Brummer
{"title":"Comparison of dairy manure versus compost effects on short-term nitrogen mineralization and microbial biomass in organic annual forage production system","authors":"Tunsisa T. Hurisso,&nbsp;Jessica G. Davis,&nbsp;Frank H. Stonaker,&nbsp;Daniel A. Goldhamer,&nbsp;Joe E. Brummer","doi":"10.1002/agg2.20555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since the adoption of national rules for organic agriculture in the United States, there has been a continued interest in meeting crop nitrogen (N) needs using animal manure. However, a lack of consistent information on the N supplying potential of manure creates uncertainty for farmers and often leads to overapplication, which can negatively impact both crop productivity and environmental sustainability. We investigated short-term N mineralization and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) following dairy manure (DM) and its compost (DMC) application to organic annual forage production system. N mineralization was determined based on the change in mineral N during a ≤75-day in-field soil core-resin bag incubation. DM and DMC application rates were targeted to supply 123 and 56 kg potentially plant-available nitrogen (PAN) ha<sup>−1</sup> in the first and second year of application, respectively. Net N mineralization exhibited a range of 42–277 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in Year 1 and 31–54 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in Year 2 across amendment treatments and increased over the course of incubation duration in both years. The proportion of total N added that was mineralized in Year 1 was greater from DM than DMC (≤35% vs. ≤7%, respectively), suggesting the inability of DMC to supply optimal levels of N to annual forages in the first crop season. In Year 2, net N mineralization did not differ between DM and DMC, but was significantly less in the unamended control than both amendments. MBC and MBN were more influenced by seasonality and soil sampling depth than by organic amendments.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20555","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the adoption of national rules for organic agriculture in the United States, there has been a continued interest in meeting crop nitrogen (N) needs using animal manure. However, a lack of consistent information on the N supplying potential of manure creates uncertainty for farmers and often leads to overapplication, which can negatively impact both crop productivity and environmental sustainability. We investigated short-term N mineralization and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) following dairy manure (DM) and its compost (DMC) application to organic annual forage production system. N mineralization was determined based on the change in mineral N during a ≤75-day in-field soil core-resin bag incubation. DM and DMC application rates were targeted to supply 123 and 56 kg potentially plant-available nitrogen (PAN) ha−1 in the first and second year of application, respectively. Net N mineralization exhibited a range of 42–277 kg N ha−1 in Year 1 and 31–54 kg N ha−1 in Year 2 across amendment treatments and increased over the course of incubation duration in both years. The proportion of total N added that was mineralized in Year 1 was greater from DM than DMC (≤35% vs. ≤7%, respectively), suggesting the inability of DMC to supply optimal levels of N to annual forages in the first crop season. In Year 2, net N mineralization did not differ between DM and DMC, but was significantly less in the unamended control than both amendments. MBC and MBN were more influenced by seasonality and soil sampling depth than by organic amendments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较奶牛粪便和堆肥对有机年度饲草生产系统中短期氮矿化和微生物生物量的影响
自美国通过有机农业国家规则以来,人们对利用动物粪便满足作物氮(N)需求的兴趣一直不减。然而,由于缺乏有关粪肥供氮潜力的一致信息,给农民带来了不确定性,往往导致过量施用,从而对作物产量和环境可持续性造成负面影响。我们研究了有机一年生牧草生产系统施用奶牛粪便(DM)及其堆肥(DMC)后的短期氮矿化度以及微生物生物量碳(MBC)和氮(MBN)。氮矿化度是根据≤75 天的田间土壤核心-树脂袋培养过程中矿物氮的变化确定的。DM 和 DMC 施用量的目标是在施用的第一年和第二年分别提供每公顷 123 千克和 56 千克潜在植物可利用氮(PAN)。在不同的改良处理中,第一年的净氮矿化度范围为每公顷 42-277 千克氮,第二年为每公顷 31-54 千克氮,并且这两年的净氮矿化度都随着培养时间的延长而增加。第 1 年,添加的总氮矿化比例中,DM 的比例高于 DMC(分别为 ≤35% 和 ≤7%),这表明 DMC 无法在第一个作物季节为一年生牧草提供最佳水平的氮。在第二年,DM 和 DMC 的净氮矿化度没有差别,但未加改良剂的对照组的净氮矿化度明显低于两种改良剂。与有机添加剂相比,MBC 和 MBN 受季节性和土壤取样深度的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploration of barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) accessions for yield and yield components from diverse agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia Genotypic variation in nitrogen fixation characteristics in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under contrasting phosphorus fertilizer regimes Limestone reaction in sandy soil: Rate effects, limestone type, moisture regime, and time Irrigation frequency effects on Prizm zoysiagrass establishment from sprigs Evaluating corn, tall fescue and canola growth on sediments dredged from the Lorain Harbor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1