Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in retinal artery occlusion: a meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s00417-024-06594-8
Shu-Han Chuang, Cheng-Hsien Chang
{"title":"Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in retinal artery occlusion: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Shu-Han Chuang, Cheng-Hsien Chang","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06594-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The goal of this meta-analysis is to examine the association between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in patients with Retinal Artery Occlusion (RAO). The analysis aims to provide insight into the potential of NLR and PLR as inflammatory biomarkers for RAO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified eight eligible studies. The analysis assessed serum NLR and PLR levels in RAO and non-RAO groups by employing standardized mean differences (SMDs). Sensitivity analyses and publication bias were examined. The diagnostic performance of these markers was evaluated with a quantitative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis, involving 1,444 participants, demonstrated significantly elevated NLR (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.49-1.28, P < 0.001) and PLR (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, P < 0.001) levels in individuals with RAO. Significant heterogeneity was noted. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness and no significant publication bias was found. Summary results of diagnostic performance revealed promising discriminatory power for NLR and PLR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results support a possible connection between systemic inflammation, as indicated by NLR and PLR, and the occurrence of RAO. Although there was heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses showed the findings to be robust. While immediate diagnostic applications are limited, understanding the role of NLR and PLR in the pathological process of RAO provides valuable insights for developing future predictive models, risk management approaches, and treatment strategies. Further research exploring mechanistic insights and conducting prospective studies is warranted to validate their clinical utility.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>What is known Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a serious condition with potential links to systemic inflammation and thrombosis. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are emerging inflammatory markers. What is new This is the first meta-analysis examining the association between NLR, PLR and RAO. Elevated NLR and PLR levels were observed in patients with RAO compared to controls. NLR and PLR show potential as indicators of systemic inflammation in RAO pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"47-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06594-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this meta-analysis is to examine the association between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in patients with Retinal Artery Occlusion (RAO). The analysis aims to provide insight into the potential of NLR and PLR as inflammatory biomarkers for RAO.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus identified eight eligible studies. The analysis assessed serum NLR and PLR levels in RAO and non-RAO groups by employing standardized mean differences (SMDs). Sensitivity analyses and publication bias were examined. The diagnostic performance of these markers was evaluated with a quantitative synthesis.

Results: The meta-analysis, involving 1,444 participants, demonstrated significantly elevated NLR (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.49-1.28, P < 0.001) and PLR (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.16-0.73, P < 0.001) levels in individuals with RAO. Significant heterogeneity was noted. Sensitivity analysis showed robustness and no significant publication bias was found. Summary results of diagnostic performance revealed promising discriminatory power for NLR and PLR.

Conclusions: The results support a possible connection between systemic inflammation, as indicated by NLR and PLR, and the occurrence of RAO. Although there was heterogeneity, sensitivity analyses showed the findings to be robust. While immediate diagnostic applications are limited, understanding the role of NLR and PLR in the pathological process of RAO provides valuable insights for developing future predictive models, risk management approaches, and treatment strategies. Further research exploring mechanistic insights and conducting prospective studies is warranted to validate their clinical utility.

Key messages: What is known Retinal artery occlusion (RAO) is a serious condition with potential links to systemic inflammation and thrombosis. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are emerging inflammatory markers. What is new This is the first meta-analysis examining the association between NLR, PLR and RAO. Elevated NLR and PLR levels were observed in patients with RAO compared to controls. NLR and PLR show potential as indicators of systemic inflammation in RAO pathogenesis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视网膜动脉闭塞中的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率和血小板与淋巴细胞比率:一项荟萃分析。
目的:本荟萃分析旨在研究视网膜动脉闭塞(RAO)患者的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)之间的关联。分析旨在深入了解 NLR 和 PLR 作为 RAO 炎症生物标志物的潜力:方法:根据 PRISMA 指南,在 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 中进行了系统检索,确定了 8 项符合条件的研究。分析采用标准化均值差异(SMDs)评估了RAO组和非RAO组的血清NLR和PLR水平。对敏感性分析和发表偏倚进行了研究。结果:荟萃分析涉及 1,444 名参与者,结果显示 NLR 显著升高(SMD = 0.88,95% CI:0.49-1.28,P 结论:荟萃分析的结果支持了系统性红斑狼疮与全身性红斑狼疮之间可能存在的联系:研究结果支持 NLR 和 PLR 所显示的全身炎症与 RAO 发生之间可能存在联系。虽然存在异质性,但敏感性分析表明研究结果是可靠的。虽然直接诊断应用有限,但了解 NLR 和 PLR 在 RAO 病理过程中的作用为开发未来的预测模型、风险管理方法和治疗策略提供了宝贵的见解。为验证其临床实用性,有必要开展进一步研究,探索其机理并进行前瞻性研究:已知信息 视网膜动脉闭塞(RAO)是一种与全身炎症和血栓形成有潜在联系的严重疾病。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)是新出现的炎症标志物。新内容 这是第一项研究 NLR、PLR 与 RAO 之间关系的荟萃分析。与对照组相比,观察到 RAO 患者的 NLR 和 PLR 水平升高。NLR和PLR显示出作为RAO发病机制中全身炎症指标的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
期刊最新文献
Reexamine the link between retinal layer thickness and cognitive function after correction of axial length: the Beijing Eye Study 2011. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after manual capsulorhexis on one eye and precision pulse capsulotomy on the other eye. Reply on comments on the paper "Descemet's membrane transplantation for the treatment of recurrent high myopic macular hole associated with retinal detachment". The rAAV2-ND1 gene therapy for Leber hereditary optic neuropathy. Adverse Events Associated with Devices for Incisional Glaucoma Surgery Performed with Implants as Reported to the FDA MAUDE Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1